2015 年 CNBC Precision Castparts 收购访谈
时间今天,8 月 10 日,星期一
WHENTODAY, MONDAY, AUGUST 10
地点CNBC《财经论谈》节目。以下为 CNBC《财经论谈》今日对伯克希尔·哈撒韦首席执行官沃伦·巴菲特的非官方采访实录。采访视频可在 CNBC.com 观看。所有引用须注明来自 CNBC。
WHERECNBC'S "SQUAWK BOX" Following is the unofficial transcript of a CNBC interview with Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett today on CNBC's "Squawk Box." Video of the interview is available on CNBC.com. All references must be sourced to CNBC.
贝基·奎克我们再来看看这起交易的数据。伯克希尔·哈撒韦收购精密铸件公司,他们给这起交易的估值是 370 亿美元,这是我们从新闻稿里看到的。沃伦·巴菲特正在连线导播室——他们用现金每股支付 235 美元,这只股票上周五收盘价为 193.88 美元。我们待会再详细聊。我想现在沃伦·巴菲特已经在线了。先生,您在吗?我们看到今天出来的消息,这让很多人感到意外,不过《华尔街日报》周六确实报道过。我想知道,您是什么时候第一次听说这事的,您什么时候第一次跟这家公司谈的,这起交易是怎么发生的?
QUICKAGAIN WE ARE LOOKING THROUGH THE NUMBERS ON THIS DEAL AGAIN IT IS BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY BUYING PRECISION CASTPARTS THIS IS A DEAL THAT THEY ARE VALUING AT 37 BILLION DOLLARS JUST LOOKING AT THE PRESS RELEASE. WARREN BUFFETT IS CALLING INTO THE CONTROL ROOM IS JUST A MINUTE THEY ARE PAYING $235 PER SHARE IN CASH THIS IS A STOCK THAT CLOSED AT $193.88 ON FRIDAY SO WE WILL BE TALKING MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS. I THINK RIGHT NOW WE DO HAVE WARREN BUFFETT ON THE LINE. SIR ARE YOU THERE? SO WE SEE THE NEWS THAT IS OUT TODAY THIS COMES AS A SURPRISE TO A LOT OF PEOPLE BUT THE WALL STREET JOURNAL DID REPORT THIS ON SATURDAY I WONDER WHEN DID YOU FIRST HEAR ABOUT THIS, WHEN DID YOU FIRST TALK TO THIS COMPANY AND HOW DID THIS DEAL HAPPEN?
巴菲特大概是 5 周前吧。这笔交易要归功于托德·库姆斯,我们大约 5 年前聘用他来管理资金,他现在管理着约 90 亿美元。大约 3 年前,他在投资组合里加入了这家公司,我之前从没听说过这家公司,托德给我讲了很多。过去几年,我逐渐熟悉了它。大概 5 周前,首席执行官马克·多尼根和首席财务官、投资者关系人员一起到伯克希尔拜访了股东,他们和托德见了面,我后来在最后 15 分钟左右也加了进来。马克给我留下了极深的印象,当然这家公司本身也让我印象深刻。之后不久,我就给他们打了个电话,问问如果我们出价,他们会不会反感。他们没有表现得多热心,但也没拒绝,表示会听听看,于是我后来就出了价。我在太阳谷见了马克,他大部分时间都在天上飞,所以专程过来,因为我正好在那儿参加艾伦公司会议。我给他出了一个价,他带回了董事会,没过多久我们就达成了协议。
BUFFETTI WOULD SAY IS WAS ABOUT 5 WEEKS AGO. YOU HAVE TO GIVE CREDIT TO TODD COMBS FOR THE DEAL WE HIRED TODD ABOUT 5 YEARS AGO TO MANAGE MONEY AND HE MANAGES ABOUT 9 BILLION NOW AND MAYBE THREE OR SO YEARS AGO HE ADDED PRECISION TO HIS PORTFOLIO AND I REALLY NEVER HEARD ABOUT THE COMPANY BEFORE THAT AND TODD TOLD ME A LOT ABOUT IT AND OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS I HAVE BECOME FAMILIAR WITH IT AND ABOUT 5 OR SO WEEKS AGO THE CEO MARK DONEGAN ALONG WITH HIS CFO AND IR PERSON CAME BY BERKSHIRE THEY WERE SEEING BERKSHIRE HOLDERS AND THEY MET WITH TODD AND THEN I DROPPED IN ON THE VISIT AND IN THE LAST 15 MINUTES OR SO AND I WAS VERY IMPRESSED BY MARK AND OF COURSE I HAD BEEN IMPRESSED BY THE COMPANY SO SHORTLY THEREAFTER I STOPPED AND GIVE THEM A CALL TO SEE IF THEY WOULD BE OFFENDED IF WE MADE A BID AND THEY DIDN'T INDICATE THEY WERE PARTICULARLY RECEPTIVE BUT THEY ALSO INDICATED THEY WOULD LISTEN SO I SUBSEQUENTLY MADE A BID. I MET MARK OUT AT SUN VALLEY, HE WAS ACTUALLY IN THE AIR MOST OF THE TIME AND SO HE CAME BY BECAUSE I WAS THERE FOR THE ALLEN COMPANY CONFERENCE AND I MADE HIM A BID AND HE TOOK IT TO THE BOARD AND BEFORE LONG WE HAD A DEAL.
安德鲁·罗斯·索金沃伦,我得跟你说,太阳谷峰会结束后那周我见到贝基,我说,沃伦在谈一笔交易。我在太阳谷看到你,你手里拿着那个电话,神情那么专注,肯定有事在发生。我当时还以为——没想到你就是在忙这个。
SORKINWARREN I HAVE GOT TO TELL YOU I SAW BECKY THE WEEK AFTER SUN VALLEY AND I SAID BUT WARREN IS DOING A DEAL I HAD SEEN YOU AT SUN VALLEY. YOU HAD THAT PHONE WITH YOU SO INTENSE THERE WAS SOMETHING GOING ON AND I THOUGHT I DIDN'T REALIZE THIS IS WHAT YOU WERE DOING.
巴菲特安德鲁,你要是能这样读懂我的表情,我在你身边就得小心点了。
BUFFETTI WILL HAVE TO BE CAREFUL WHEN I AM AROUND YOU ANDREW IF YOU CAN READ MY FACE LIKE THAT.
索金从价格角度看,我们收到的一个问题是基于 300 亿美元计算的 EBITA,我当时觉得这大概是 20 倍 EBITA,所以我说这不是市场上最划算的交易。但它的确让你能迅速花掉一大笔钱。不过就估值而言,你怎么看?而且当你谈到花这种量级的钱时,是不是像我们之前讨论的那样,实际上要捡到便宜交易越来越难了?
SORKINFROM A PRICE PERSPECTIVE ONE OF THE QUESTIONS WE HAD FROM AN EBITA I WAS DOING IT OFF OF THE $30 BILLION AND THINKING THIS WAS ABOUT 20 TIMES EBITA WHICH I WAS SAYING NOT THE CHEAPEST DEAL IN TOWN. IT DOES ALLOW YOU TO SPEND A LOT OF MONEY QUICKLY. IN TERMS OF THE VALUATION THOUGH HOW DO YOU THINK ABOUT IT AND WHEN YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT SPENDING THIS KIND OF MONEY IS IT HARDER AND HARDER AS WE WERE TALKING ABOUT EARLIER TO ACTUALLY GET A REALLY CHEAP DEAL?
巴菲特不是 20 倍的 EBITA,安德鲁。我不确定你看的是什么数字,但在我看来,所有的交易都显得贵,不过这一笔,我们确实为一家非凡的公司付了一个非常好的价格。这家公司的经营者,在我看来,在他所做的事情上是全球最棒的。
BUFFETTIT IS NOT 20 TIMES EBITA THOUGH ANDREW. I AM NOT SURE WHAT FIGURES YOU ARE LOOKING AT THERE BUT ALL DEALS SEEM EXPENSIVE TO ME BUT THIS ONE WE ARE CERTAINLY PAYING A VERY GOOD PRICE FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY COMPANY RUN BY A PERSON THAN AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED HE IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD AT WHAT HE DOES.
安德鲁·罗斯·索金过去几年他做了不少交易,价值大约 80 亿美元。展望未来几年,你会不会计划用大量伯克希尔的现金进行更多收购,把这个公司当成一个整合平台?
SORKINHE'S MADE A NUMBER OF DEALS OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS ABOUT 8 BILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF TRANSACTIONS WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS COMPANY OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS DO YOU IMAGINE USING A LOT OF BERKSHIRE CASH TO MAKE ADDITIONAL ACQUISITIONS TO USE IT AS A ROLL UP VEHICLE IF YOU WILL?
巴菲特嗯,这家公司一直都在收购,我也不知道他们这些年到底收购了多少家,但数量确实不少。因为航空航天领域的零部件种类繁多,他们多年来一个接一个地收购。实际上,我相信他们在第一个财季已经完成了几笔小交易,可能还有一笔正在进行中。现在他们利润相当可观,所以很可能用内部产生的资金就能完成这些收购,或者说大部分收购。但如果他们需要伯克希尔出钱,打个电话就行。
BUFFETTWELL ITS ALWAYS ACQUIRED COMPANIES I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY ACQUISITIONS THEY MADE OVER THE YEARS BUT IT IS A LOT. BECAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS THAT GO INTO AEROSPACE IN THE WAY OF PARTS AND THEY'VE GONE AFTER ONE ITEM AFTER ANOTHER OVER THE YEARS. IN FACT THEY'VE MADE A COUPLE SMALL DEALS I BELIEVE IN THE FIRST FISCAL QUARTER AND I THINK THEY'VE GOT MAYBE ONE PENDING OR SO. NOW THEY MAKE A GOOD BIT OF MONEY SO THEY WILL PROBABLY BE ABLE TO DO THE ACQUISITIONS OR MANY OF THE ACQUISITIONS INTERNALLY GENERATED FUNDS BUT IF THEY NEED ANY MONEY FROM BERKSHIRE ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS CALL.
贝基·奎克沃伦,这是一笔代价高昂的交易。这是史上最贵的一笔吗?与伯灵顿北方铁路相比如何?
QUICKLYWARREN THIS IS AN EXPENSIVE DEAL IS THIS THE MOST EXPENSIVE DEAL EVER? HOW DOES IT MATCH UP TO BURLINGTON NORTHERN?
巴菲特其实最糟糕的交易,就是那些没成的。你刚才提到了 Dexter 鞋业。但要论买入时的市盈率,这笔交易绝对排得上号——我们买伯灵顿的时候,市盈率也很高,但那是在 2009 年秋天,当时盈利处于低谷,所以市盈率高是因为基数低。而精密铸件的盈利,因为油气行业和航空航天领域的一些变化,已经有所下滑。所以,对我们来说,这个市盈率确实非常高。
BUFFETTWELL THE MOST DEALS ARE THE ONES THAT DON'T WORK OUT. YOU MENTIONED DEXTER SHOE A LITTLE WHILE AGO. BUT IN TERMS OF PRICE EARNINGS MULTIPLES GOING IN THIS IS RIGHT UP THERE AT THE TOP NOW WHEN WE BOUGHT BURLINGTON THAT WAS A HIGH PE BUT IT WAS OFF A VERY DEPRESSED FIGURE BECAUSE WE BOUGHT THAT IN THE FALL OF 2009 WHEN EARNINGS WERE AT A TROUGH. AND PRECISIONS EARNINGS HAVE FALLEN OFF MODERATELY BECAUSE OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE OIL AND GAS FIELD WHERE THEY DO SOME BUSINESS AS WELL AS IN AEROSPACE SO BUT THIS IS A VERY HIGH MULTIPLE FOR US.
苏利文石油天然气这块您可说中了我的心思。请问,您这笔投资——如果有的话——有多大成分是押注美国油气行业至少从价格角度看可能正在触底?
SULLIVANYOU READ MY MIND ON OIL AND GAS HOW MUCH OF THIS IF AT ALL IS A BET THAT THE U.S. OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY MAY BE BOTTOMING OUT AT LEAST FROM A PRICE PERSPECTIVE?
沃伦·巴菲特嗯,我们打算在这个行业干上 100 年,所以油气行业未来一年怎么样,对我们买这桩生意来说根本无所谓。就算有人笃定地告诉我,油气行业接下来要低迷个 3 年,我照样会做这笔买卖。这不是什么预测,我只是想说,当我们有机会买下一家很棒的公司时,油气低迷持续多久对我们不重要——通常你得到这种机会,背后总有个原因,这一次或许就是油气行业的低迷帮了我们。但未来总有一天,航空航天也会出现低迷,那对这样的公司来说会严重得多。可是,如果你看几十年的话,油气和航空航天都会是好生意,而这些家伙是关键——尤其在航空航天业,这个行业需要他们。他们被普遍视为最可靠、最具创新精神、最可信赖的供应商,提供各种飞机上极其关键的零部件。
BUFFETTWELL WE ARE GOING TO BE IN THIS BUSINESS FOR A 100 YEARS SO IT DOESN'T REALLY MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE WHAT OIL AND GAS DOES IN THE NEXT YEAR IN TERMS OF US BUYING IT. IF SOMEONE TOLD ME FOR SURE THE OIL AND GAS BUSINESS WAS GOING TO BE IN THE DULDRUMS WE'LL SAY FOR 3 YEARS I STILL WOULD HAVE MADE THE DEAL. THAT'S NOT A PREDICTION I AM JUST SAYING IT IS NOT IMPORTANT TO US HOW LONG THE OIL AND GAS SLUMP LASTS WHEN YOU GET A CHANCE TO BUY A WONDERFUL COMPANY YOU KNOW THERE IS USUALLY SOME REASON WHY YOU ARE GETTING THAT CHANCE AND PERHAPS THE SLUMP IN OIL AND GAS HELPS US IN THIS CASE. BUT THERE WILL BE SOMEDAY THERE WILL BE A SLUMP IN AEROSPACE AND THAT WILL BE MUCH MORE SEVERE FOR A COMPANY LIKE THIS BUT IF YOU LOOK OVER THE DECADES BOTH OIL AND GAS AND AEROSPACE WILL BE GOOD BUSINESS AND THESE FELLOWS ARE THEIR KEY PARTICULARLY IN THE AEROSPACE BUSINESS THE INDUSTRY NEEDS THEM THEY'RE UNIVERSALLY REGARDED AS THE MOST RELIABLE INNOVATIVE DEPENDABLE SUPPLIER OF VERY KEY PARTS THAT GO INTO ALL KINDS OF AIRCRAFTS.
索金沃伦,谈谈你常说的防御模式——当你评估一家公司时,如何看待它的市场份额,以及它维持(即使不能扩大)市场份额的能力。
SORKINWARREN SPEAK TO THE DEFENSIVE MODE THAT YOU OFTEN TALK ABOUT WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT PARTICULAR COMPANY IN TERMS OF ITS MARKETSHARE AND ITS ABILITY TO MAINTAIN IF NOT GROW THAT MARKETSHARE
巴菲特嗯,你需要的是有硬件设施的人,但这只是很小的一部分。他们确实拥有极好的硬件设施,但真正需要的是脑力,尤其在最顶层,你需要一个对事业充满全部热情的人。我跟马克见过四五次面,每次他都在飞机上——他一年要在天上飞将近一千个小时。这家伙热爱这个行业,就像我热爱伯克希尔一样,而且他在这方面比我强得多。你找不到这样的人,你肯定雇不到这样的人。我能向马克保证的一件事就是,公司由他全权掌管。像他这样的人非常非常罕见,从他一手打造的事业就能看出来,从他对自己所做的事怀有的那股热情也能看出来。他永远不满足——无论是争取更多机身和发动机的业务,还是把成本压到该有的水平,他都永不知足。他就是对这个行业充满热情。
BUFFETTWELL WHAT YOU NEED IS YOU NEED PEOPLE THAT HAVE PHYSICAL FACILITIES BUT THAT IS A SMALL PART OF IT. THEY DO HAVE MARVELOUS PHYSICAL FACILITIES BUT WHAT YOU REALLY NEED IS BRAIN POWER AND YOU NEED PARTICULARLY AT THE TOP YOU NEED SOMEBODY WITH A TOTAL PASSION FOR THE BUSINESS AND I'VE MET MARK FOUR OR FIVE TIMES AND EACH TIME HE'S BEEN IN THE AIR AND HE'S IN THE AIR ALMOST A THOUSAND HOURS A YEAR THIS FELLOW LOVES THIS BUSINESS LIKE I LOVE BERKSHIRE AND HE'S A LOT BETTER AT IT THAN I AM AT BERKSHIRE. YOU CAN'T FIND PEOPLE LIKE THIS. YOU CERTAINLY CAN'T HIRE THEM. THE ONE THING I GUARANTEE MARK IS THAT HE'S RUNNING THE COMPANY. PEOPLE LIKE THIS ARE VERY VERY RARE. YOU CAN SEE IT IN WHAT HE HAS BUILT AND YOU CAN SEE IT IN THE PASSION HE'S GOT FOR WHAT HE IS DOING NOW. HE'S NEVER SATISFIED IN TERMS OF GETTING MORE BUSINESS IN THE AIRFRAME AND THE ENGINES. HE'S NEVER SATISFIED IN TERMS OF GETTING HIS COST TO WHERE THEY SHOULD BE. HE JUST HAS A PASSION FOR THE BUSINESS.
贝基·奎克沃伦,这对你动用的现金意味着什么?我知道你喜欢在手头保留大约 200 亿美元现金。你还在市场上看其他潜在交易吗?还是说这笔交易会让你暂时退出市场?
QUICKWARREN WHAT DOES THIS MEAN IN TERMS OF THE CASH THAT YOU ARE USING FOR THIS? I KNOW YOU LIKE TO KEEP ABOUT 20 BILLION DOLLARS IN CASH ON HAND. ARE YOU STILL IN THE MARKET FOR OTHER POTENTIAL DEALS? OR DOES THIS TAKE YOU OUT OF THE MARKET FOR AWHILE?
巴菲特这笔交易让我们退出了大象级别收购的市场,但未来六个月我们或许会买几样小东西。我们正在谈几个项目,但就同等规模的交易而言,这笔交易基本让我们退出了。这笔交易我们大概会借 100 亿美元,再动用自有现金约 230 亿美元,差不多这个量级。全部完成后,我们手里大概还会剩下超过 400 亿美元现金。但我一直希望手里时刻留有大量现金,所以这意味着未来 12 个月左右我们需要重新补充弹药,但这不妨碍我们做小规模交易——我们可能还会做几笔。
BUFFETTTHIS TAKES US OUT OF THE MARKET FOR AN ELEPHANT BUT WE WILL PROBABLY BE BUYING A FEW SMALL THINGS IN THE NEXT 6 MONTHS. WE ARE IN NEGOTIATIONS ON A COUPLE BUT IN TERMS OF A DEAL OF SIMILAR SIZE IT PRETTY MUCH TAKES US OUT. WHAT WE WILL PROBABLY DO ON THIS ONE WE WILL PROBABLY BORROW ABOUT 10 BILLION AND USE ABOUT 23 BILLION OF OUR OWN CASH ON THAT ORDER. WE'LL BE LEFT WITH OVER 40 BILLION PROBABLY IN CASH WHEN WE GET ALL THROUGH. BUT I LIKE TO HAVE A LOT OF CASH AT ALL TIMES SO THIS MEANS WE HAVE TO RELOAD OVER THE NEXT 12 MONTHS OR SO BUT IT DOESN'T PRECLUDE DOING SMALLER DEALS BUT WE WILL BE DOING A FEW PROBABLY.
安德鲁·罗斯·索金沃伦,另一个问题。你总是谈到人才和特别的人,以及伯克希尔里那些特别的人,而他们确实很难找。当你想到马克·戴尔的时候,我想问的是,我们是不是应该开始把他列入潜在人选名单——这个人可能现在只管理这一家公司,但将来或许会被纳入伯克希尔体系,在接班人问题上发挥作用?
SORKINAND WARREN ONE OF THE OTHER QUESTIONS YOU ALWAYS TALK ABOUT TALENT AND SPECIAL PEOPLE AND SPECIAL BERKSHIRE PEOPLE AND IT IS HARD TO FIND THEM. WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT MARK DARE I ASK THE QUESTION SHOULD WE START TO ADD HIM TO THE LIST OF POTENTIAL PEOPLE THAT MAY ONLY RUN THIS PARTICULAR COMPANY NOW BUT MAYBE PUT INTO THE BERKSHIRE FOLD WHEN IT SOMES TO SUCCESSION?
巴菲特如果我没看错马克的心思——这一点我相当有把握——他只想经营精密铸件,把它推向越来越高的高度。他不想管理伯克希尔。我们旗下大多数经理人都是这样,他们热爱自己正在做的事,这正是美妙之处。我买一家公司时,确实必须做出判断:这世上我根本没法经营精密铸件,我们运营团队里其实任何人都做不到。所以,我的第一个问题就是问马克,他 58 岁——我问他,有没有想过 65 岁时就去佛罗里达打沙狐球之类的事情。只要我们善待他——我们现在就得善待员工,我们对他好——他就会继续经营这家公司,几十年又几十年。这正是他想做的事,就像我喜欢经营伯克希尔一样。
BUFFETTIF I READ MARK CORRECTLY AND IN THIS RESPECT I AM SURE I DO ALL HE WANTS TO DO IS RUN PRECISION AND TO TAKE IT TO GREATER AND GREATER HEIGHTS HE DOES NOT WANT TO RUN BERKSHIRE AND TRUE OF MOST OF OUR MANAGERS THEY LOVE WHAT THEY ARE DOING THAT'S THE BEAUTY OF IT. I HAVE TO DECIDE REALLY WHEN I BUY A COMPANY THERE IS NO WAY IN THE WORLD THAT I COULD RUN PRECISION OR REALLY ANYBODY IN OUR OPERATION COULD SO THE FIRST I ASK AND MARK'S 58 I ASK IF HE HAS ANY IDEAS AT 65 THAT HE'S GO AND PLAY SHUFFLE BOARD IN FLORIDA OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AS LONG AS WE TREAT HIM RIGHT NOW WE'VE GOT TO TREAT PEOPLE RIGHT WE TREAT HIM RIGHT HE WILL BE RUNNING THIS FOR DECADES AND DECADES. AND THAT'S WHAT HE WANTS TO DO JUST LIKE I LIKE RUNNING BERKSHIRE.
贝基·奎克沃伦,你提到这笔交易会让你在 12 个月左右的时间里无法继续猎捕“大象”,因为公司需要靠持续流入的现金来重新补充弹药。就在上周,比尔·阿克曼公开披露了他持有亿滋国际的大量股份,他考虑的设想之一是亿滋国际有可能并入卡夫亨氏。这是否意味着这条路走不通了?你怎么看比尔的这个提议?
QUICKWARREN YOU MENTIONED THAT THIS WILL TAKE YOU OUT OF THE HUNT FOR A BIG ELEPHANT FOR 12 MONTHS OR SO WHILE THE COMPANY RELOADS WITH THE CASH CONTINUALLY COMING IN. JUST LAST WEEK BILL ACKMAN MADE IT PUBLIC THAT HE HAS A LARGE STAKE IN MONDELEZ ONE OF THE THINGS HE THOUGHT ABOUT IS POTENTIALLY MONDELZ GETTING LUMPED IN WITH KRAFT HEINZ. DOES THAT MEAN IT IS NOT AN OPTION AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF BILL'S PROPOSAL?
巴菲特嗯,3G 的朋友们想做什么我都会听,但在卡夫亨氏这件事上,我们未来几年有的忙了。我觉得相当不可能——你永远不会想把话说死,说任何事都绝无可能——但我认为卡夫亨氏在未来几年内进行大规模收购的可能性相当低。再过些年,要是他们动手了,我也不会惊讶。不过,收购也得在财务上说得通,坦白讲,多数食品公司的售价都到了那种地步,就算我们把卡夫亨氏该做的功课全做完了,也很难做成交易。很多食品公司的售价,一定程度上反映了市场对它们自身改善的预期——人们多少看到了卡夫亨氏正在发生的变化——但相信我,这并不容易。
BUFFETTWELL I WILL LISTEN TO ANYTHING MY FRIENDS AT 3G WANT TO DO BUT WITH KRAFT HEINZ WE HAVE OUR WORK CUT OUT FOR US FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS. I THINK IT IS QUITE UNLIKELY YOU NEVER WANT TO SAY ANYTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE BUT I THINK IT IS QUITE UNLIKELY THAT KRAFT HEINZ WOULD BE DOING A BIG ACQUISITION IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS SOMEWHERE DOWN THE ROAD I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED. BUT IT ALSO WOULD HAVE TO MAKE SENSE FINANCIALLY AND FRANKLY MOST OF THE FOOD COMPANIES SELL AT PRICES THAT IT WOULD BE VERY HARD FOR US TO MAKE A DEAL EVEN IF WE HAD DONE ALL OF THE WORK NEEDED AT KRAFT HEINZ. A LOT OF THE COMPANIES ARE SELLING AT PRICES THAT SORT OF REFLECT IMPROVEMENTS IN THEM THAT PEOPLE SORT OF WHAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING AT KRAFT HEINZ AND BELIEVE ME THIS IS NOT EASY.
贝基·奎克意思是,按现在的价格,你觉得亿滋国际不合适?
QUICKMEANING THAT MONDELEZ AT THESE PRICES YOU WOULDN'T LIKE?
巴菲特嗯,我们很难做成一笔合算的交易,对。但谁知道未来会发生什么呢。如果你看看家乐氏、金宝汤,或者亿滋,它们的股价在某种程度上已经被市场定价了,那些价格反映了一种预期——即达到卡夫亨氏式利润率是可能的。情况也许确实如此,但我在其他地方还没看到过。
BUFFETTWELL IT WOULD BE HARD FOR US TO MAKE A DEAL THAT MAKES SENSE YEAH. BUT WHO KNOWS WHAT HAPPENS DOWN THE LINE BUT IF YOU LOOK AT KELLOGG OR CAMPBELL'S SOUP OR MONDELEZ THEY'RE PRICES TO SOME EXTENT THE MARKET HAS PUT INTO THOSE COMPANIES PRICES THAT REFLECT AN EXPECTATION KRAFT HEINZ TYPE MARGINS ARE POSSIBLE AND THAT MAY BE THE CASE BUT I HAVE NOT SEEN IT ELSEWHERE.
苏利文巴菲特先生,2009 年很多银行来找您帮忙。过去几个月里,有没有石油或天然气公司来找您,寻求您的帮助,寻求您的投资?
SULLIVANMR BUFFETT IN 2009 MANY OF THE BANKS CAME TO YOU FOR HELP. HAVE YOU HAD ANY OIL OR GAS COMPANIES COME TO YOU IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS LOOKING FOR YOUR HELP, LOOKING FOR YOUR INVESTMENT?
巴菲特还没有,但要是油价一直这么低。如果油价一直这么低——到目前为止我得说,油气行业里大多数人,也许直到最近,都觉得油价会反弹。他们可能没觉得天然气价格会多大反弹,但认为油价会反弹。石油生产公司卖油时,并非按 WTI 每桶 45 美元来定价,他们假定的是更高价格,当然远期曲线也反映了更高价格。我认为直到现在,跟油气公司做切实可行的交易都不太容易,但未来如何我们走着瞧。具体说,还没有人来找过我。
BUFFETTNOT YET BUT PRICES STAY DOWN HERE. IF PRICES STAY DOWN HERE SO FAR I WOULD SAY THAT MOST OF THE PEOPLE IN THE OIL AND GAS BUSINESS UP MAYBE UNTIL VERY RECENTLY THEY FELT THAT OIL PRICES WOULD BOUNCE BACK. THEY MAY NOT HAVE FELT GAS PRICES WOULD BOUNCE MUCH BUT THEY FELT OIL PRICES WOULD BOUNCE BACK. THE OIL PRODUCTION COMPANIES HAVE BEEN SELLING ON A BASIS NOT OF $45 WTI THEY HAVE ASSUMED HIGHER PRICES AND OF COURSE THE FORWARD CURVE HAVE REFLECTED HIGHER PRICES. I THINK IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HARD TO MAKE REALISTIC DEALS WITH OIL AND GAS UP UNTIL NOW BUT WE WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS IN THE FUTURE. TO BE SPECIFIC NOBODY HAS COME TO ME.
贝基·奎克这是否意味着,你在油气行业没有进行任何其他买入?
QUICKDOES THAT MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NOT MADE ANY OTHER PURCHASES IN THE OIL AND GAS BUSINESS?
巴菲特没错。
BUFFETTTHAT'S CORRECT
贝基·奎克那么,除了今天这笔交易,您没看到任何您觉得是机会、愿意买入的标的?
QUICKSO THERE IS NOTHING THAT YOU'VE SEEN ASIDE FROM THIS DEAL TODAY THAT YOU THINK HAS BEEN AN OPPORTUNITY YOU WOULD BUY INTO?
巴菲特没有。当然,这块业务算是次要的,我估计精密铸件大概有 15% 的业务跟油气相关,过去几个季度他们受了不小的冲击,因为石油行业一放缓,就算他们手里有各种设备,客户也会突然之间暂缓订货,哪怕生产还在继续。所以,没有,我们在油气领域没有任何投入。
BUFFETTNO OF COURSE THIS IS KIND OF SECENDARY I WOULDN'T SAY MAYBE 15% OF PRECISION'S BUSINESS HAD BEEN IN THERE AND THEY GOT HURT IN THE LAST COUPLE OF QUARTERS SIGNIFICANTLY BECAUSE WHEN OIL SLOWS DOWN IF THEY'VE GOT VARIOUS BUILDING EQUIPMENT ON HAND ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY DON'T NEED TO ORDER ANY FOR AWHILE EVEN THOUGH CONTINUE TO PRODUCE. SO NO WE HAVE NOT MADE ANY COMMITMENTS IN OIL AND GAS.
安德鲁·罗斯·索金嘿,沃伦,每次见到你,我总会问同一个问题——IBM,IBM 最近怎么样?现在股价我想大概在 155 美元左右,你感觉如何?
SORKINHEY WARREN EVERY TIME I SEE YOU I ALWAYS ASK THE QUESTION IBM, IBM UPDATE THE STOCK IS TRADING I THINK ABOUT 155 DOLLARS RIGHT ABOUT NOW HOW ARE YOU FEELING ABOUT IT
巴菲特我感觉挺好。
BUFFETTI FEEL FINE.
安德鲁·罗斯·索金你持有那家公司股票的成本价现在是多少?
SORKINWHAT'S YOUR BASIS IN THAT COMPANY AT THIS POINT?
巴菲特我们买这只股票花了多少钱?
BUFFETTWHAT'S OUR STOCK COST US?
安德鲁·罗斯·索金对。
SORKINYEH
巴菲特我的回答是,大约 170 左右。
BUFFETTI WOULD SAY AROUND 170
安德鲁·罗斯·索金按我的算法,现在大概在 170 美元左右,这笔交易实际还是赚了钱的,我觉得一部分是股息的功劳,但你完全不担心股价的事?
SORKINAROUND 17O NOW BY MY MATH YOU HAVE ACTUALLY MADE THE MONEY STILL ON THIS DEAL ON PART I THINK THE FUNCTION OF THE DIVIDENDS BUT YOU ARE NOT CONCERNED AT ALL IN TERMS OF THE STOCK
巴菲特股价下跌我太喜欢了——这意味着公司能以更便宜的价格回购股票,也意味着如果我想加仓,过几天看看我们的 13F 文件就知道了,我能用更低的价格买到。
BUFFETTI LOVE IT WHEN IT GOES DOWN IT MEANS THE COMPANY BUYS STOCK CHEAPER AND MEANS IF I WANT TO BUY MORE STOCK YOU CAN LOOK AT OUR 13F IN A FEW DAYS IT MEANS I GET TO BUY IT CHEAPER
贝基·奎克那意思是说你一直在买那个股票?
QUICKDOES THAT MEAN YOU'VE BEEN BUYING IT?
巴菲特我不是在卖股票。人们以为我们买某只股票时,是想让它涨。我们当然不希望它涨——也许过个五年十年,它最终得涨——但我们非常乐于看到公司用更便宜的价格回购自己的股票。我是说,这事在美国运通身上就发生过。美国运通是长期回购自家股票的公司,我们持有其 15% 的股份,股价越低,我们的持股比例上升得就越快,比股价上涨时快得多。
BUFFETTI AM NOT A SELLER OF STOCK. PEOPLE ASSUME WHEN WE BUY SOME STOCK WE WANT IT TO GO UP. WE DON'T WANT IT TO GO UP MAYBE OBVIOUSLY EVENTUALLY MAYBE FIVE OR TEN YEARS FROM NOW BUT WE LOVE THE IDEA OF A COMPANY BUYING ITS STOCK CHEAPER. I MEAN THAT'S HAPPENED AT AMERICAN EXPRESS FOR INSTANCE AMERICAN EXPRESS IS A REGULAR REPURCHASER OF SHARES AND WE OWN 15% OF IT AND OWNERSHIP GOES UP FASTER IF THE STOCK IS DOWN THAN IF THE STOCK IS UP.
苏利文上周五,价值行动资本(ValueAct Capital)的杰弗里·乌本对美国运通进行了 10 亿美元的积极主义投资。巴菲特先生,当您持有一家像美国运通这样的公司时,您乐意见到积极主义投资者介入吗?您欢迎这种做法吗?
SULLIVANWE HAD ON FRIDAY A BILLION DOLLAR ACTIVIST INVESTMENT IN AMERICAN EXPRESS MR BUFFETT JEFFREY UBEN OF VALUEACT CAPITAL. WHEN YOU OWN A STOCK LIKE AN AMERICAN EXPRESS ARE YOU HAPPY TO SEE AN ACTIVIST COME IN DO YOU WELCOME IT.
巴菲特不,说不上欢迎,但他们的钱怎么用,是他们的事。实际上,这事让股价上涨了四五个点,所以在美国运通进行回购的背景下,我们是不能买入美国运通的股票的,因为它是一家银行控股公司,而我们持股已超过 10%。但股价越便宜,用同样金额的资金,美国运通就能回购更多的股份,总的来说这对我们有利。我们是在买入——你知道,这不存在任何道德问题,因为交易发生在市场上——但我们的合伙人能用更便宜的价格买到。
<<<END P 10>>>
BUFFETTNO NOT PARTICULARLY BUT IT IS UP TO THEM WHAT THEY DO WITH THEIR MONEY. ACTUALLY IT SENDS UP FOUR OR FIVE POINTS SO THE EXTENT THAT AMERICAN EXPRESS IS REPURCHASING SHARES WE CAN'T BUY STOCKS IN AMERICAN EXPRESS BECAUSE IT IS A BANKHOLDING COMPANY AND WE OWN OVER 10% BUT THE CHEAPER THE STOCK IS THE MORE SHARES AMERICAN EXPRESS WILL BE ABLE TO REPURCHASE FOR A GIVEN AMOUNT OF MONEY AND ON BALANCE THAT HELPS US WE'RE BUYING YOU KNOW THERE IS NO MORAL PROBLEM ATTACHED TO IT BECAUSE IT TAKES PLACE IN THE MARKET BUT WE'RE ON OUR PARTNERS CHEAPER.
贝基·奎克我们换个话题,这也是比一周前便宜很多的东西。你看看传媒类股票,鲍勃·伊格尔说对 ESPN 有些担忧,从他角度看是很短暂的担忧,但市场把这当成了一个巨大的利空信号,不光是迪士尼,所有传媒相关股票都跟着跌。你觉得传媒行业里有什么股票,在这个价位上是你喜欢的吗?
QUICKLET'S TALK ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE THAT IS ALSO A LOT CHEAPER THAN IT WAS A WEEK AGO YOU LOOKS AT THE MEDIA STOCKS DISNEY KICKED IT OFF WHEN BOB IGER SAID THERE ARE CONCERNS ABOUT ESPN, VERY BRIEF CONCERNS FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE THE MARKET TOOK THAT AS A HUGE SELLING POINT NOT ONLY FOR DISNEY BUT ALL OF THE MEDIA RELATED STOCKS DO YOU SEE ANYTHING IN THE MEDIA INDUSTRY YOU LIKE AT THESE PRICES?
巴菲特不,我想说我认为鲍勃·艾格——我跟他很熟,20 多年前就跟他打过交道——是美国最出色的管理者之一,而且还是个好人。不过,我对媒体行业的现状只是个观察者。托德和特德持有一些媒体股票,但我不在其中,这轮抛售并没有让我动心。
BUFFETTNO I WOULD SAY THAT I CONSIDER BOB IGER AND I KNOW HIM WELL AND HAD EXPERIENCE WITH HIM MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGO I THINK HE IS ONE OF THE GREAT MANAGERS IN AMERICA AND A GOOD GUY BEYOND THAT BUT I'M AN OBSERVER OF THE MEDIA PICTURE TODD AND TEDD OWN SOME SHARES IN CERTAIN MEDIA STOCKS BUT I AM NO VICTIM OF THIS MYSELF AND THE SELL OFF DID NOT ENTICE ME.
安德鲁·罗斯·索金嘿,沃伦,说到回购,有个问题——我想自从你发出那封信、我们请上你做节目之后,我们还没聊过这个——但贝莱德的拉里·芬克几个月前给全国各地的 CEO 们发了一封信,说,“行了,别再回购了,别再派息了,我们希望你们投资未来。”而且,我认为那封信在某种程度上似乎启发了希拉里·克林顿,让她提出了她正在谈论的那种“季度资本主义”做法和方案,也就是围绕投资的税收结构和资本利得结构进行改革。你对希拉里·克林顿的说法怎么看?对拉里·芬克的说法又怎么看?
SORKINHEY WARREN SPEAKING OF BUYBACKS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS AND I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THIS SINCE YOU SENT YOUR LETTER AND WE HAD YOU ON THE SHOW BUT LARRY FINK FROM BLACKROCK SENT A LETTER A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO TO CEOS AROUND THE COUNTRY AND SAID LOOK STOP WITH THE BUYBACKS, STOP WITH THE DIVIDENDS WE WANT YOU INVESTING IN THE FUTURE AND IN PART I WOULD ARGUE THAT LETTER SEEMED TO INSPIRE HILLARY CLINTON WITH HER LATEST QUARTERLY CAPITALISM APPROACH AND PROGRAM THAT SHE'S TALK ABOUT IN TERMS OF CHANGING THE TAX STRUCTURE CAPITAL GAINS STRUCTURE AROUND INVESTMENTS. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF WHAT HILLARY CLINTON HAD TO SAY AND WHAT DO YOU THINK OF WHAT LARRY FINK HAD TO SAY?
沃伦·巴菲特很多人把回购搞得很复杂。回购的逻辑很简单:当你用低于内在价值的价格买回自家股票,而且这笔钱不是企业运营所必需的时候,回购就有意义。如果出价高于内在价值,那就毫无意义,这是个非常简单的道理,但长期以来很多管理层都视而不见。看看回购的历史你就会发现,从总体规模上看,人们在股市上涨时回购的股票远比下跌时多得多,这么做其实跟普通散户没什么两样。有些精彩的投资故事,就是靠聪明地回购股票写出来的——所谓聪明,就是在低于内在价值时买入。如果我们的股票卖得远低于内在价值,我们会成筐成筐地买回来。前提必须是远低于内在价值,如果我们觉得是在按内在价值或更高的价格买,一股都不会碰。这个等式一点也不复杂,但管理层在宣布要搞一个 50 亿美元的回购计划时,他们应该说:如果我们能以 X 价格或更低的价格买到,我们就搞这个 50 亿美元的回购。可现实根本不是这么操作的。
BUFFETTWELL PEOPLE MAKE BUYBACKS VERY COMPLICATED. BUYBACKS MAKE SENSE WHEN YOU ARE BUYING YOUR STOCK BACK BELOW ITS INTRINSIC VALUE AND WHEN YOU DON'T NEED THAT MONEY FOR THE NEEDS OF THE BUSINESS. IT MAKES NO SENSE WHEN YOU PAY ABOVE INTRINSIC VALUE AND THAT'S A VERY SIMPLE PRINCIPAL BUT IT HAS BEEN IGNORED BY MANY MANAGEMENTS OVER TIME. IF YOU LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF BUYBACKS PEOPLE BUYBACK A LOT IN TERMS OF AGRIGATE BUYBACKS PEOPLE BUY A LOT MORE STOCK BACK WHEN STOCKS ARE UP THAN WHEN THEY ARE DOWN BUT IN THAT WAY THEY ARE SORT OF BEHAVING LIKE JOE PUBLIC YOU KNOW. THERE HAVE BEEN SOME GREAT INVESTMENT STORIES BASED ON PEOPLE WHO BOUGHT BACK STOCK INTELLIGENTLY WHICH MEANS BUYING IT AT A DISCOUNT FROM ITS INTRINSIC VALUE. WE WOULD BUY BACK STOCK BY THE BUSHELL BASKETS IF IT SOLD WELL BELOW INTRINSIC VALUE IT WOULD HAVE TO BE WELL BELOW INTRINSIC VALUE AND WE WON'T BUY A SHARE IF WE THINK WE ARE PAYING INTRINSIC VALUE OR MORE. IT IS NOT A COMPLICATED EQUATION BUT MANAGEMENTS WHEN SOMEBODY SAYS THEY ARE GOING TO HAVEA 5 BILLION DOLLAR BUYBACK THEY OUGHT TO SAY WE ARE HAVING A 5 BILLION DOLLAR BUYBACK IF WE CAN BUY IT AT X OR BELOW BUT THAT'S JUST NOT THE WAY IT OPERATES.
沙利文这是资本的高效运用吗
SULLIVANHAS IT BEEN AN EFFICIENT USE OF CAPITAL
巴菲特回购对有些公司来说是一种极其高效的资本运用,对另一些公司来说则是一种极其愚蠢的资本运用。我认为,不幸的是,我们的回购规模一直很小,但仅有的那几次回购都非常合算。不过我们没法大规模进行回购。
BUFFETTIT HAS BEEN A TERRIFICLY EFFICIENT USE OF CAPITAL FOR SOME COMPANIES AND BEEN A VERY STUPID USE OF CAPITAL FOR OTHER COMPANIES. I WOULD ARGUE THAT OUR BUYBACKS HAVE BEEN PEANUTS UNFORTUNATELY BUT OUR COUPLE OF BUYBACKS MADE GREAT SENSE. BUT WE COULDN'T DO IT ON SCALE.
安德鲁·罗斯·索金你怎么看希拉里·克林顿关于资本利得的提案?她还说,我相信她希望人们自己研究回购应如何监管。伊丽莎白·沃伦等人则认为,回购实质上就是内幕交易,因为公司对此知情。
SORKINAND WHAT DID YOU MAKE OF HILLARY CLINTONS PROPOSAL ON CAPITAL GAINS BUT SHE ALSO SAID I BELIEVE THAT SHE WANTS PEOPLE TO LOOK INTO BUYBACKS THEMSELVES IN TERMS OF HOW THEY SHOULD BE REGULATED. ELIZABETH WARREN AND OTHERS HAVE SUGGESTED THEY ARE EFFECTIVELY INSIDER TRADING BECAUSE THE COMPANIES KNOW ABOUT IT.
巴菲特嗯,我很乐意以后找个时间就此写篇文章。过去这些年我写过差不多 20 次,总体上我非常认同希拉里在完善我们即将在竞选过程中讨论的各个要点方面的取向。但回购既不是极乐净土,也不是什么邪恶之事,问题只在于它有没有道理。如果我们的股票远低于内在价值,而我们手里又有企业用不上的钱,那我们就会尽可能快地回购——不巧的是,每当我这么说,这事就偏偏成不了。
BUFFETTWELL I WILL BE GLAD TO WRITE A PAPER ON IT SOMETIME. I HAVE WRITTEN ON IT ABOUT 20 TIMES OVER THE YEARS AND IN GENERAL VERY MUCH APPROVE OF WHERE HILLARY IS GOING IN TERMS OF FINE TUNING ALL THE POINTS WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT AS THE CAMPAIGN PROGRESSES. BUT BUYBACKS ARE NOT NIRVANA AND THEY ARE NOT EVIL IT IS JUST A QUESTION OR WHETHER THEY MAKE SENSE AND IF OUR STOCK SELLS WELL BELOW INTRINSIC VALUE AND WE HAVE MONEY WE DON'T NEED FOR THE BUSINESS WE WILL BUY IT BACK JUST AS FAST AS WE CAN NOW UNFORTUNATELY WHENEVER I SAY THAT IT KEEPS IT FROM HAPPENING.
贝基·奎克沃伦,我们知道你是希拉里·克林顿的支持者,但你上周看了共和党全国辩论吗?
QUICKWARREN WE KNOW THAT YOU ARE A SUPPORTER OF HILLARY CLINTON BUT DID YOU WATCH THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL DEBATES THAT TOOK PLACE LAST WEEK?
巴菲特我可不想错过这事。
BUFFETTI WOULDN'T HAVE MISSED IT
贝基·奎克那你当时怎么想的?
QUICKAND WHAT DID YOU THINK?
巴菲特我觉得那真是绝妙的电视节目,而且我认为,在大量初选中按比例分配代表、再加上超级政治行动委员会能让候选人持续获得资金(否则那些表现不佳的人会因缺钱而退出),这种情况下,确实有小概率出现这样的局面:当他们去参加共和党全国代表大会时,没有一个人能获得多数票。但我认为那会非常、非常有意思。唐纳德·特朗普会拿到一定比例的代表,其他一大群人也会各拿一些。过去,除非你排在前两三名,否则你的资金会枯竭,你只能撑过几个州就出局了。但如今有超级政治行动委员会在背后撑着,相当多的候选人可以坚持相当长的时间,蛋糕可能会被分割到没人能拿到多数票。这将非常有趣。这是一场绝佳的观赏性运动。
BUFFETTI THOUGHT THAT IT WAS TERRIFIC TELEVISION AND I THINK THERE'S A SMALL CHANCE WITH PROPORTIONAL AWARDING DELEGATES IN A GREAT MANY OF THE PRIMARIES AND WITH SUPER PACKS ENABLING PEOPLE TO KEEP GETTING FINANCE WHERE AS OTHERWISE THEY WOULD DROP OUT FOR LACK OF MONEY IF THEY WEREN'T DOING THAT WELL. I THINK THERE IS ACTUALLY SOME CHANCE THAT WHEN THEY GO TO THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION NO ONE WILL HAVE A MAJORITY GOING IN BUT I THINK IT WILL BE VERY VERY INTERESTING. DONALD TRUMP IS GOING TO HAVE A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF DELEGATES AND SO WILL A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHERS AND IN THE PAST UNLESS YOU WERE IN THE TOP 2 OR 3 YOUR FUNDING DRIES UP AND YOU GET TO A COUPLE OF STATES AND THAT WAS WITH BUT WITH SUPER PACKS AROUND YOU CAN HAVE QUITE A FEW CANDIDATES IN IT FOR QUITE A BIT OF TIME AND THE PIE COULD GET DIVIDED IN SUCH A WAY THAT NOBODY HAS A MAJORITY. IT IS GOING TO BE VERY INTERESTING. IT IS A GREAT SPECTATOR SPORT.
贝基·奎克我们确实做了一项隔夜民调,是 NBC 新闻在周五到周六进行的,结果显示唐纳德·特朗普仍然领跑,这可能会让一些此前因他那个表现而基本把他排除在外的专家感到意外。
QUICKWE DID HAVE AN OVERNIGHT POLL AN NBC NEWS POLL THAT WAS CONDUCTED FROM FRIDAY INTO SATURDAY IT SHOWED THAT DONALD TRUMP IS STILL LEADING THE PACK WHICH MIGHT COME AS A SURPRISE TO SOME PUNDITS WHO HAD KIND OF WRITTEN HIM OFF AFTER THAT PERFORMANCE.
巴菲特没错,你要是能忽略约翰·麦凯恩不算英雄之类的事,并且支持率不掉,那你就有一个很扎实的基本盘。而且,就算他长期保持一个相当稳固的基本盘,我也不会觉得意外。那就意味着,在按比例分配代表名额的州,他能拿到相当数量的代表。而且他也不会缺钱,所以看下去会很有意思,尤其是如果你是个民主党人的话。
BUFFETTYEH NO HE IF YOU CAN GET BY THE JOHN MCCAIN IS NOT A HERO AND A FEW THINGS AND NOT HAVE YOUR NUMBERS GO DOWN YOU HAVE A VERY SOLID BASE AND YOU KNOW I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF HE MAINTAINS QUITE A SOLID BASE FOR A LONG TIME. AND THAT MEANS HE IS GOING TO GET A FAIR NUMBER OF DELEGATES IF YOU GET IT IN PROPORTIONAL STATES. AND HE IS NOT GOING TO RUN OUT OF MONEY SO IT IS GOING TO BE A LOT OF FUN TO WATCH PARTICULARLY IF YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT.
贝基·奎克我本来想说,作为一个民主党人,你一定很享受现在这个局面。你最希望看到你的候选人跟谁对决?
QUICKI WAS GOING TO SAY AS A DEMOCRAT YOU MUST ENJOY HOW THIS PLAYS OUT. WHO WOULD YOU MOST LIKE TO SEE YOUR CANDIDATE RUN AGAINST?
巴菲特嗯,我觉得我要是做出那种预测,那简直就是给那位候选人判了死刑。我想看看她跟所有对手同台竞技。
BUFFETTWELL I THINK IF I GAVE THAT PREDICTION IT WOULD BE SORT OF THE KISS OF DEATH ON THAT CANDIDATE. I WANT TO SEE HER RUN AGAINST THE WHOLE FIELD.
贝基·奎克沃伦,我们知道还有很多话题想跟你聊。周五我们看到就业数据出炉了,新增 21.5 万个就业岗位,跟预期一致。很多人猜测美联储会在九月份加息。你对自己看到的数字和你所掌控的企业脉搏非常了解,对经济动向有很好的判断。你觉得当下经济形势怎么样?你认为美联储九月份应该怎么做?
QUICKYOU KNOW WARREN WE HAVE A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER THINGS WE WOULD LOVE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT WE SAW THE JOBS NUMBER THAT CAME IN. THE JOBS REPORT WAS JUST AS EXPECTED ON FRIDAY 215,000 A LOT OF PEOPLE SPECULATING THAT THE FED WILL RAISE INTEREST RATES COME SEPTEMBER. YOU HAVE A VERY GOOD IDEA OF WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE ECONOMY JUST BASED ON THE NUMBERS THAT YOU SEE AND THE BUSINESSES THAT YOU HAVE YOUR FINGER ON THE PULSE. WHAT DO YOU THINK IS HAPPENING IN THE ECONOMY. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FED SHOULD DO IN SPETEMBER?
巴菲特我认为当前经济的情况,跟过去五年一直发生的事一模一样——它正以大约 2% 的速率缓慢前行。某些行业偶尔会有一波冲刺,比如汽车行业现在就很强劲,但整体来看这是一次非常平稳的增长。人们一直在谈论二次探底,谈论加速复苏,每次他们说经济会朝某个方向猛冲时,它偏偏不那样做。经济已经恢复过来了,考虑到五六年前我们遭遇的那种冲击,它的恢复已经相当不错了。但我没有看到它特别加速,也没有看到它减速。我以前说过,当欧洲需要维持低利率、而且全球都是这个局面时,美国想推高利率非常难。我不断听到各位央行行长说加息很快就会来,但我认为这不是一个轻松的决定——欧洲的利率比我们低得多,如果你在美国把利率推到大幅高于欧洲的水平,进出口都可能受到非常显著的影响。
BUFFETTI THINK WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE ECONOMY IS EXACTLY WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING NOW FOR FIVE YEARS IS THAT IT IS MOVING AHEAD ROUGHLY AT 2% RATE AND IN CERTAIN INDUSTRIES A SPURT OCCASSIONALLY AUTOS ARE STRONG RIGHT NOW BUT IT HAS BEEN A VERY STEADY INCREASE AND PEOPLE HAVE TALKED ABOUT DOUBLE DIPS AND THEY'VE TALKED ABOUT ACCELERATION AND EVERY TIME THEY TALK ABOUT IT MOVING SHARPLY IN ONE DIRECTION IT DOESN'T DO IT. THE ECONOMY HAS COME BACK AND IT HAS COME BACK VERY WELL CONSIDERING THE KIND OF SHOCK THAT WE HAD 5 OR 6 YEARS AGO BUT I DON'T SEE IT PARTICULARLY ACCELERATING AND I DON'T SEE IT DECELERATING EITHER. I HAVE SAID BEFORE I THINK IT IS VERY TOUGH TO PUSH RATES HIGHER IN THE U.S. WHEN EUROPE NEEDS TO KEEP THEM ALL AND YOU'VE GOT THE SITUATION EXISTING AROUND THE WORLD BUT I KEEP HEARING THE VARIOUS GOVERNORS SAY IT IS GOING TO HAPPEN SOON SO BUT I DON'T THINK IT IS AN EASY DECISION WHEN RATES ARE CONSIDERABLY LOWER IN EUROPE AND YOU MAY BE AFFECTING EXPORTS AND IMPORTS VERY SIGNIFICANTLY IF YOU PUSH RATES HERE TO BE CONSIDERABLY HIGHER THAN THEY EXIST IN EUROPE.
贝基·奎克最近很多人都在担心市场,你要是看了财报季里那些公司的股价波动,有些动静大得离谱——营收或利润上差一点点,股价就暴跌两位数。媒体股也是整体走低,整个板块往下掉,这让不少人觉得市场疲态尽显,调整恐怕在所难免。不过我猜你肯定不这么想,要是你愿意做这样的大交易,那你平时会考虑市场的日常起落吗?
QUICKTHERE HAVE BEEN A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN CONCERNED ABOUT THE MARKET LATELY IF YOU HAVE WATCHED WHAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING DURING EARNINGS SEASON SOME OF THE MOVES HAVE BEEN EXTRAORDINARY TO SEE PEOPLE MISSING BY SMALL AMOUNTS ON EARNINGS OR REVENUE LINES AND THEN COMING IN WITH DOUBLE DIGIT STOCK DECLINES YOU ALSO SAW WHAT HAPPENED WITH MEDIA STOCKS OVERALL MOVE THE ENTIRE SECTOR LOWER THAT HAS SOME PEOPLE THINKING THAT THERE IS A LOT OF WEAKNESS IN THE MARKET AND THAT THERE IS SOMETHING OF A CORRECTION THAT'S DUE. I AM GUESSING THAT I WOULDN'T PUT YOU IN THAT CAMP IF YOU ARE WILLING TO DO DEALS LIKE THIS OR DO YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS?
巴菲特股票在 10 年后、20 年后会涨得更高,也许高得多——我还没聪明到能择时进出。如果你拿的是长期会涨得多的东西,那就不用折腾。假如你觉得自家房子要跌 5%,你也不会卖了房子,指望等便宜 5% 了再买回来。那不是我的玩法。我的玩法是,以合理的价格买优秀的企业,然后长期拿着,这样你就能赚大钱。但我觉得,在市场上进进出出的能力极其有限,在我这儿,这个能力为零。
BUFFETTSTOCKS ARE GOING TO BE HIGHER AND PERHAPS A LOT HIGHER 10 YEARS FROM NOW, 20 YEARS FROM NOW I AM NOT SMART ENOUGH TO PICK TIMES TO GET IN AND GET OUT IF YOU ARE IN SOMETHING THAT IS GOING TO BE A LOT HIGHER OVER TIME. IF YOU THOUGHT YOUR HOUSE WAS GOING TO GO DOWN 5% IN PRICE YOU WOULDN'T SELL YOUR HOUSE AND HOPE TO BUY IT BACK 5% CHEAPER. THAT'S NOT MY GAME. MY GAME IS TO OWN DECENT BUSINESSES AND OWN THEM AT DECENT PRICES AND YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE A LOT OF MONEY OVER TIME IF YOU DO IT BUT I THINK THE ABILITY OF PEOPLE TO DANCE IN AND OUT OF MARKETS IS QUITE LIMITED AND IN MY CASE IT IS ZERO.
贝基·奎克沃伦,今天《纽约时报》头版有条关于可口可乐的报道,可口可乐也是你作为最大股东持有的公司。报道指出,可乐与一些有影响力的科学家联手,在医学期刊上推动一个信息——真正重要的其实是你锻炼了多少,而不是你吃了什么。《纽约时报》实际上对这件事持怀疑态度,认为大公司资助这样的信息不太好。作为最大股东,你怎么看?
QUICKWARREN THERE IS A STORY ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE NEW YORK TIMES TODAY ABOUT COCA COLA WHICH IS A COMPANY THAT YOU ALSO THE LARGEST SHAREHOLDER IN IT POINTS OUT THAT COCA COLA HAS TEAMED UP WITH SOME INFLUENTIAL SCIENTISTS TO TRY AND ADVANCE A MESSAGE IN MEDICAL JOURNALS THAT IT IS REALLY MORE ABOUT HOW MUCH YOU EXERCISE NOT WHAT YOU EAT THAT MATTERS. THE TIMES ACTUALLY KIND OF PUTS THIS AS SOMETHING WHERE THEY LOOK ASKANCE THE IDEA THAT BIG COPORATION IS FUNDING A MESSAGE LIKE THIS WHAT DO YOU SAY AS THE LARGEST SHAREHOLDER?
巴菲特体重变化取决于摄入和消耗的平衡。你摄入 2700 卡路里、消耗 2700 卡路里,体重就不会变;你摄入 3500 卡路里、消耗 2500 卡路里,体重就会增加。这是个数学等式。如果你跟我一样不爱运动,那就最好别吃太多。体重管理没什么神秘可言。卡路里是明确的——蛋白质和碳水化合物每克 4 卡,脂肪每克 9 卡。如果你真想减肥,就得算清楚,让身体消耗掉你摄入的热量。
BUFFETTWHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR WEIGHT DEPENDS ON HOW MUCH YOU TAKE IN AND HOW MUCH YOU BURN UP. AND IF YOU TAKE IN 2700 CALORIES AND YOU BURN UP 2700 YOUR WEIGHT ISN'T GOING TO CHANGE AND IF YOU TAKE IN 3500 AND BURN 2500 YOU ARE GOING TO GAIN WEIGHT. IT'S A MATHEMATICAL TYPE EQUATION AND IF YOU ARE LIKE ME AND DON'T LIKE TO EXERCISE MUCH THAN YOU BETTER NOT TAKE IN TOO MUCH. THERE IS NO MYSTERY TO WEIGHT. CALORIES ARE DEFINED THERE'S 4 PER GRAM IF YOU ARE DEALING WITH PROTEIN AND CARBOHYDRATES THERE'S 9 PER GRAM WITH FAT AND YOU'VE GOT TO FIGURE IT OUT IF YOU WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT SO YOUR BODY BURNS OFF AS MANY AS YOU ARE CONSUMING.
贝基·奎克好的,沃伦,我们想感谢您今天早上来参加我们的节目。再次祝贺您达成这笔交易。关于 CNBC:CNBC 在美国、亚太、欧洲、中东和非洲、CNBC World 以及 CNBC HD 频道播出,是全球公认的商业新闻领导者,为全球约 3.71 亿家庭提供实时金融市场报道和商业信息,其中包括美国和加拿大超过 1 亿家庭。CNBC 还每天向中国 4 亿家庭提供商业更新。该网络在北美每天 15 小时的商业节目直播(工作日东部时间凌晨 4:00 至晚上 7:00)在新泽西州恩格尔伍德克利夫斯的 CNBC 全球总部制作,并包含来自全球 CNBC 新闻分社的报道。CNBC 晚间节目则融合了新真人秀节目、CNBC 专为其制作的大获成功的系列节目以及多部独特的内部纪录片。CNBC 还拥有庞大的数字产品组合,通过多种平台提供实时金融市场新闻和信息。这些产品包括全球商业在线门户 CNBC.com;提供实时全球市场数据和 CNBC 全球节目直播访问权限的高级集成桌面/移动服务 CNBC PRO;以及一套 CNBC 移动产品,包括 CNBC Real-Time iPhone 和 iPad 应用。媒体成员可以在 NBC Universal Media Village 网站 http://www.nbcumv.com/mediavillage/networks/cnbc/ 上获取有关 CNBC 及其节目的更多信息。有保密新闻线索?我们期待您的来信。注册免费新闻简报,将更多 CNBC 内容发送至您的邮箱。将此内容发送至您邮箱,并获取更多关于我们产品和服务的信息。© 2026 Versant Media, LLC。保留所有权利。Versant Media 旗下公司。数据为实时快照 *数据至少延迟 15 分钟。全球商业和金融新闻、股票报价以及市场数据和市场分析。数据亦由
QUICKWELL WARREN WE WANT TO THANK YOU FOR JOINING US THIS MORNING. AGAIN CONGRATULATIONS ON THE DEAL. About CNBC: With CNBC in the U.S., CNBC in Asia Pacific, CNBC in Europe, Middle East and Africa, CNBC World and CNBC HD , CNBC is the recognized world leader in business news and provides real-time financial market coverage and business information to approximately 371 million homes worldwide, including more than 100 million households in the United States and Canada. CNBC also provides daily business updates to 400 million households across China. The network's 15 live hours a day of business programming in North America (weekdays from 4:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. ET) is produced at CNBC's global headquarters in Englewood Cliffs, N.J., and includes reports from CNBC News bureaus worldwide. CNBC at night features a mix of new reality programming, CNBC's highly successful series produced exclusively for CNBC and a number of distinctive in-house documentaries. CNBC also has a vast portfolio of digital products which deliver real-time financial market news and information across a variety of platforms. These include CNBC.com, the online destination for global business; CNBC PRO, the premium, integrated desktop/mobile service that provides real-time global market data and live access to CNBC global programming; and a suite of CNBC Mobile products including the CNBC Real-Time iPhone and iPad Apps. Members of the media can receive more information about CNBC and its programming on the NBC Universal Media Village Web site at http://www.nbcumv.com/mediavillage/networks/cnbc/. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you. Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inbox Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. © 2026 Versant Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. A Versant Media Company. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes.
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by