2005 年 Kansas 商学院学生伯克希尔总部问答

2005-12-02 · 投资、职业、黄金与人生建议 · 原文约 2946 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

2005 年 12 月 2 日

December 2, 2005

堪萨斯大学商学院学生——与沃伦·巴菲特在伯克希尔总部的问答

University of Kansas Business School Students - Q&A with Warren Buffett at Berkshire Headquarters

我不认识这些笔记的作者。2013 年 2 月 28 日,我在办公室的一份旧打印件里找到了它们。

I am not familiar with author of these notes. I found them in an old printout in my office on February 28, 2013

不允许带笔记本电脑进场,所以这些笔记是我手速和记忆力的产物(天哪!)。它们已经和别的同学交叉核对过,所以原话可能不够精确,但我相信我们抓住了巴菲特回答每个问题时的精髓。巴菲特在开场时表示,他来这里是为了谈论学生们关心的事。唯一不能提的是最近堪萨斯大学对内布拉斯加大学的橄榄球赛(捷鹰队以 40 比 15 击败玉米收割机队,终结了对手的 36 连胜纪录)。

Laptops were not allowed, so these notes are a product of the speed of my writing and my memory (egads!). They have been crossed checked with other students, so while the quotes will not be exact, I believe we’ve captured the essence of how Buffett responded to each question. Buffett began the session by stating that he was here to talk about what was on the students’ minds. The only thing off limits was the recent Kansas/Nebraska football game (the Jayhawks beat the Cornhuskers 40-15 snapping a 36 game

连胜纪录!)。

losing streak!).

问:您年纪越来越大,怎么还能一直有动力去获取超额回报?

Q: As you get older, how do you continue to find motivation to earn outsized returns?

沃伦·巴菲特我衡量成功并不是看赚了多少钱,或者某个复利回报率。在你的净资产后面多加几个零,并不会让你更幸福。我做的事情没有终点,这是一场没有目的地的旅程。我很幸运,一路走来都乐在其中。

WEBI don’t measure success by money earned or some compound rate of return. Adding more zeros to your net worth won’t make you happy. In what I do, there is no endpoint; it’s a journey without a destination. I’ve been lucky that I’ve had fun throughout my journey.

金融领域没有四分钟一英里这回事。如果我的目标是跑进四分钟一英里,而且我实现了这个目标,那之后就没别的事可做了。做企业不一样,总会有新问题冒出来让事情保持有趣,但这些问题与过去足够相似,我可以用过去积累的知识来应对。

There’s no four minute mile in finance. If my goal was to run a four minute mile, and I accomplished that goal, I’d have nothing else to work towards. With business, there will be new problems to keep things interesting, but those problems will be similar enough to the past that I can apply knowledge gained in the past.

我打算一直干到老糊涂的那一天。问题在于,你压根不知道什么时候算老糊涂了——得别人来告诉你。我跟孩子们说过,必须三个人同时告诉我,说我脑子不行了,才算数。要是只有一个人来说,我八成会把他从遗嘱里划掉!

I plan to keep going until I go ga-ga. The problem is you don’t know when you’ve gone ga-ga; someone else has to tell you. I’ve told my children that all three of them have to tell me at the same time when I’ve lost my mind. If one of them were to do it, I’d probably end up taking that child out of the will!

问:最近在 eBay 上,一次与沃伦·巴菲特共进午餐的机会拍出了 35 万美元。投资者该如何判断这顿饭的价值?

Q: A lunch with Warren Buffett recently sold for $350,000 on eBay. How can an investor determine the value

的沃伦·巴菲特?

of Warren Buffett?

沃伦·巴菲特我觉得这笔钱确实是捐给了一个极好的事业。位于旧金山的格莱德纪念教堂,当年分来了一位毫无经验的牧师塞西尔·威廉姆斯,60 年代初他才二十多岁。那本来是个濒临倒闭的教堂,但塞西尔通过收留那些跌入谷底的人,把它重新救活了。格莱德基金会至今仍在为大量被社会边缘化的人提供帮助,这个组织得到了很多名人的支持。塞西尔觉得拍卖和我吃午餐是个挺好的筹款方式。第一年拍出了 2.5 万美元。两年前,第一次上 eBay 拍卖,拍到了 25 万美元。今年拍到了 35 万美元。我答应跟中标者吃午饭,他们下午时间都归我。我见过的这些人个个都很有意思。上次一起吃饭的那个家伙,开了一家为安防应用做数据库设计的公司。他识别出了 9/11 事件中 19 名劫机者里的 5 个。他实在太有意思了,我同意又见了他一次。这次是我请他吃早饭,把午餐的价格砍掉了一半——降到

WEBI think the money goes towards a really good cause. Glide Memorial Church, based in San Francisco, was assigned an inexperienced minister, Cecil Williams, who was in his 20’s back in the early ’60s. It was a dying church, but Cecil revived it by taking in those that had hit rock-bottom. The Glide Foundation continues to provide a lot of help to those that have been marginalized by society. The organization gets a lot of support from celebrities. Cecil believed auctioning lunch with me would be a good fundraiser. The first year it went for $25,000. Two years ago, the first year on eBay, it went for $250,000. This year it went for $350,000. I agree to have lunch with the winner and then they have me for the afternoon. All of the people I’ve met have been really interesting. The guy from the last lunch has a company that designs databases for security applications. He identified 5 of the 19 9/11 hijackers. He was so interesting that I agreed to meet him again. This time I bought him breakfast. It cut the price of lunch in half - to

$175,000!

$175,000!

问:你有很多有影响力的朋友。从他们身上你学到了什么?

Q: You have a lot of influential friends. What have you learned from them?

沃伦·巴菲特我学到了拥有好朋友的重要性。他们都是聪明人,这么多年来给了我很多好主意,但这不如拥有好朋友本身来得重要。我和盖茨夫妇一起进行过四次重要的旅行。每次,比尔总是确保我能玩得开心。在计划去中国旅行时,他问我这次旅行中想吃什么样的食物。我告诉他,我还没发现有什么比五岁时吃的东西更让我喜欢的了。他把我的话当真了,提前做了安排,派厨师到中国,教我们即将入住的地方的人如何制作汉堡和其他美国食物。他还让我跟一个 12 岁的孩子打乒乓球……

WEBI’ve learned the importance of having good friends. They are smart people, so they’ve given me good ideas over the years, but that’s not as important as having good friends. I’ve been on four major trips with the Gateses. Each time, Bill always ensures that I have a good time. When planning the trip to China, he asked me what types of food I’d like to eat during the trip. I told him I haven’t found anything I like better than what I was eating when I was five years old. He took me seriously and planned ahead by sending chefs to China to teach people at the places we were going to stay how to prepare burgers and other American food. He had me playing ping pong against a 12-year-old (of

当然,她是个冠军)。我们还一起玩过德州扑克、上过绘画课,当然也经常打桥牌。

course she was a champion). We’ve also played Texas Hold’em, taken art lessons together and of course we play a lot of bridge.

士兵们谈论战时情谊,那种情谊是在多年相互照应中形成的。我对朋友们的感情也是如此。

Soldiers talk about war-time bonds. Those are formed from looking after each other for a number of years. I feel the same way about my friends.

至于查理(芒格),他自然影响了我,让我去关注好生意,而非便宜生意。如果只能拥有查理身上“商业/智慧”那一半,或是他“为人”的那一半,我会毫不犹豫选后者。查理和我一起度过了很多快乐时光。

As for Charlie [Munger], he of course influenced me to look at good businesses instead of cheap businesses. If I could only have the business/intelligence half of Charlie or the personal half, I’d take the personal half hands down. Charlie and I have had a lot of fun together.

问:您师从本杰明·格雷厄姆,并把自己的成功很大程度上归功于他。但以创造的财富来衡量,他远不如您成功。您怎么解释这个差别?

Q: You studied under Ben Graham and give him a lot of credit for your success. However, measured in wealth created, he was much less successful than you. How do you explain that?

沃伦·巴菲特本对赚钱本身不感兴趣。投资只是他的副业。他写剧本,把希腊文著作译成英文,等等。格雷厄姆玩的不是财富最大化游戏。他本是文科出身,但被说服去了华尔街工作,为的是证明文科生也能在金融行业取得成功。

WEBBen didn’t care about making money. Investing was a sideline for him. He wrote plays, transcribed Greek books into English, etc. Graham wasn’t playing the wealth maximization game. He was a liberal arts graduate, but was convinced to work on Wall Street to prove that liberal arts students could succeed on in the finance industry.

格雷厄姆不会因为赚钱而兴奋。我常拿着一个绝佳的投资想法去找他,说“我们要发财了!”,可他毫不在意(不过杰里·纽曼在意)。

Graham didn’t get excited about making money. I would come to him with a great investment idea and say “we’re going to get rich!”, but he didn’t care (although Jerry Newman did).

他之所以写书,是因为骨子里有学术气质。他想用任何人都能理解的方式来解释投资。格雷厄姆想创立一套连艾奥瓦州的牙医都能照着做的方法,一套没有专业知识的人也能运用并从中赚钱的体系。他想提供一个任何人都能遵循的量化方法。

He wrote books because he had an academic nature. He wanted to explain investing in a way anyone could understand. Graham wanted to develop a method that a dentist in Iowa could follow, a system that someone with no special knowledge could use and make money. He wanted to provide a quantitative approach that anyone could follow.

源自格雷厄姆的三大核心理念,都在《聪明的投资者》这本书里。1)把股票看作企业的一部分;2)市场短期是投票机,长期是称重机;3)安全边际。

The three big ideas that came from Graham are all in The Intelligent Investor. 1) View stocks as pieces of businesses; 2) The market is a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term; 3) Margin of safety.

问:您手里有超过 400 亿美元的现金。您打算怎么投出去?

Q: You have over $40 billion in cash. How do you plan to invest it?

沃伦·巴菲特我们今年投出的现金已经多了不少。比如,花了 34 亿美元收购太平洋电力公司。潜在收购标的的竞争仍很激烈。很难找到用 50 美分买 1 美元资产的机会,所以问题就变成了,用 80 美分买 1 美元资产是否合算。手里有 400 亿美元,查理和我会坐立不安,但这世上

WEBWe’ve been able to invest a lot more cash this year. $3.4 billion was spent on the Pacific Corp. acquisition, for example. There is still a lot of competition for potential acquisitions. It’s hard to find 50-cent dollars, so the question becomes whether or not it makes sense to buy 80-cent dollars. Charlie and I get antsy with $40 billion, but there are

比这更让人头疼的问题还有的是。市场终会变化,我们会看到机会。我们必须时刻准备好出手。

worse problems to have. Eventually the market will change and we’ll see opportunities. We have to be prepared to act.

1998 年就是个例子。当时因为长期资本管理公司出事,大部分机会都出在固定收益领域。在那种时刻,你必须能摆脱恐惧情绪。我当时正跟盖茨一家度假。如果我当时在纽约而不是黄石公园,我们本可以赚到 20 亿美元。

1998 was an example. Most of the opportunity was in fixed income at the time because of what happened at Long Term Capital Management. You had to be able to disassociate with fear at the time. I was on vacation with the Gates at the time. We could have made $2 billion if I was in New York instead of Yellowstone.

问:您不相信半强式有效市场理论。您反对它的理由是什么?

Q: You don’t believe the semi-strong efficient market theory. What are your arguments against it?

沃伦·巴菲特这理论有什么可辩护的?市场是相当有效的。大多数股票定价是合理的。但“股票大部分时间定价合理”和“股票所有时间定价合理”之间存在天壤之别。这差别就是致富和一直受穷的差别。举个例子,《华盛顿邮报》当时在股市上的估值是 1 亿美元。你要是半夜在某个岛上搞场拍卖,竞标者都会游着泳过来,出价 4 亿美元。这怎么能叫市场有效?

WEBHow can you argue for it? The market is fairly efficient. Most stock prices are appropriate. There is a huge difference between stocks being priced appropriately most of the time and all of the time. It’s the difference between getting rich and staying poor. For example, Washington Post was valued by the stock market at $100 million. You could have had an auction in the middle of the night on some island and bidders would have been swimming to it to bid $400 million. How can you call the market efficient?

你得下大功夫深挖,才能找到这种机会。20 世纪 50 年代,穆迪和标普的手册是很好的信息源。[巴菲特随后向学生们展示了 1951 年版《穆迪银行与金融手册》的原件。接着他一页页翻,翻到第 1431 页,上面列有西部保险证券。] 这就像淘金。西部保险证券 1949 年每股收益 21.66 美元,1950 年每股收益 29.09 美元。而 1950 年的股价区间只有 3 到 13 美元。我亲自去查了这家公司,没发现任何问题。我还在《斯科特堡报》上登了广告找股票。[巴菲特随后翻到第 1443 页。] 现在我再翻几页,到第 1443 页。我当时就像进了金矿!这里是国民美国保险。每股收益 29.02 美元,股价在 27 到 28 美元之间。这家公司离我当时在奥马哈上班的地方只隔一个半街区。

It’s important to do a lot of digging to find those situations. Back in the 1950s the Moody’s and S&P manuals were a good source of information. [Buffett then showed the students the actual copy of the 1951 edition of Moody’s Banks and Finance manual. He then proceeded to flip through the pages and then turned to page 1431, which listed Western Insurance Securities.] This is panning for gold. Western Insurance Securities had EPS of $21.66 in 1949, EPS of $29.09 in 1950. The price range in 1950 was $3-13. I personally went to check out the company and found nothing wrong. I ran an ad in the Fort Scott Newspaper to find shares. [Buffett then flipped to page 1443]. Now I’ll flip a few more pages to 1443. I was in gold territory! Here is National American Insurance. It had EPS of $29.02 and traded in a range of $27-28. This company was located a block and a half from where I was working at the time in Omaha.

我又去查了一遍,同样完全没毛病。当然,教授们会说市场是有效的,那这些股票当时的价格就肯定是合理的!

Again, I went to check it out and there was absolutely nothing wrong. Of course, a professor would say the markets are efficient, so these stocks must have been priced right!

那么问题来了:今天还能这么做吗?[巴菲特随后掏出一本花旗集团编制的 2004 年《韩国股票指南》。] 我在花旗的经纪人让我翻翻这本韩国版的穆迪手册。他说看着会跟 1951 年一模一样,他说对了。我翻着书页,发现很多好公司的市盈率极低。只用了五六个小时,我就拼出一个小组合,大约 20 到 25 只股票——总额差不多 1 亿美元。

So the question is: Can you still do this today? [Buffett then pulled out the 2004 Korean Stock Guide compiled by Citigroup]. My broker at Citigroup told me to look through this Korean version of the Moody’s guide. He said it would look just like 1951, and he was right. I began flipping through the pages and found a lot of good companies trading at very low multiples. In 5-6 hours I put together a small portfolio of 20-25 stocks - about $100 million total.

举个例子:大韩面粉厂。它在韩国小麦粉市场占有 25% 的份额。每股账面价值 20.6 万韩元,公司持有的有价证券合每股 20.1 万韩元,而且股价只有 2 倍市盈率。市场显然不是所有时候都有效。有些机会确实能让你赚到惊人的财富。

One example was DaeHan Flour Mills. It has a 25% market share in wheat flour in South Korea. Book value was 206,000 Won and the company had 201,000 Won in marketable securities and was trading at 2x earnings. The market is clearly not efficient all the time. There are certain opportunities that can make you fabulously rich.

教授们必须宣誓效忠有效市场假说,否则就有被排挤的风险。

Professors have to pledge allegiance to the efficient market hypothesis or they risk getting ostracized.

问:现在可以从哪些渠道获取投资灵感?

Q: What sources of investment ideas are available today?

沃伦·巴菲特首先,你需要分成两堆。你必须把那些你能理解、能合理预测的企业,与那些你不能理解、无法合理预测的企业区分开来。举个例子,口香糖和软件。你还得认清自己能知道什么、不能知道什么。把所有你无法理解,或者难以预测的东西,都放到一个堆里。

WEBFirst, you need two piles. You have to segregate businesses you can understand and reasonably predict from those you don’t understand and can’t reasonably predict. An example is chewing gum versus software. You also have to recognize what you can and cannot know. Put everything you can’t understand or that is difficult to predict in one

这就是太难的那个堆。一旦你知道了另一个堆,那么接下来重要的是大量阅读,了解这些堆里公司所属的行业,收集背景资料等等。阅读大量的 10-K 和 10-Q 报告等。阅读竞争对手的资料。在我进行分析之前,我不想先知道股票的价格。我想先做功课,估算出这只股票的价值,然后与当前报价进行比较。如果提前知道了价格,可能会影响我的分析。我们正准备做一笔 50 亿美元的投资,我用的就是这套流程。

pile. That is the too-hard pile. Once you know the other pile, then it’s important to read a lot, learn about the industries, get background information, etc. on the companies in those piles. Read a lot of 10Ks and Qs, etc. Read about the competitors. I don’t want to know the price of the stock prior to my analysis. I want to do the work and estimate a value for the stock and then compare that to the current offering price. If I know the price in advance it may influence my analysis. We’re getting ready to make a $5 billion investment and this was the process I used.

我以前分析过赛马。赔率加起来必须是 100%。有时会出现赛马圈里所说的“overlay”(超赔)情况。我们在股市里找的也是这种超赔机会。就像寻宝一样。你可以通过拓宽自己的能力圈来增加投资灵感的来源。这些年来,我的能力圈一直在扩大。1951 年的时候,我只需要搞懂保险就行,光这一个行业就有足够多的机会。

I used to handicap horse racing. The odds had to add to 100%. Sometimes there would be what in horse racing is referred to as an “overlay”. We’re looking for overlays in the stock market. It’s like a treasure hunt. You can increase your sources of investment ideas by widening your circle of competence. I’ve widened my circle over the years. I only needed to understand insurance in 1951. There were enough opportunities in that sector alone.

问:现在的大学生毕业生该怎样找工作?

Q: How should current college graduates go about finding a job?

沃伦·巴菲特[巴菲特对这个问题的标准回答是:做你热爱的事,别为钱发愁,诸如此类。] 不要做你不相信的事,也不要和你讨厌或不信任的人共事。大多数人选工作,看的是哪家工资最高,或者纯属偶然。

WEB[Buffett gave his standard reply to this question: do what you love, don’t worry about the money, etc.]. Don’t do something you don’t believe in or work with people you don’t like or trust. Most pick their job based on top pay and happenstance.

问:谈谈你对捐钱的看法?

Q: Thoughts on giving money?

沃伦·巴菲特这一切都始于一个简单的问题:“我怎样才能用每花出去的 1 美元救回最多的生命?”盖茨已经捐出了 300 亿美元。

WEBIt all starts with a simple question, “how do I save the most lives per dollar spent?” Gates has given $30 billion.

他为治愈疟疾投入了大量资金。他做决定的依据是这个问题本身,而不是能不能有一栋以自己名字命名的大楼。我认为这种思路棒极了。遗产税是件好事。每年去世的 200 万人里,只有 3 万人受遗产税影响。钱总得有个来源。

He’s given a lot to cure malaria. His decision was based on that question, not whether he would have a building named after him. I think that is a terrific approach. The estate tax is a good thing. Out of the two million that die every year, only 30,000 are affected by the estate taxes. The money has to come from somewhere.

问题是怎么给。临终再捐?还是每年捐?25 年前我能捐的那点钱起不到多大作用,盖茨那种模式在当时并不适合我。现在这样更有道理,因为我能做的更多了。

The question is how to give. At the end? Yearly? What I could give 25 years ago would not make much of a difference. The Gates model would not have worked for me then. Now it makes more sense because I could do more.

问:黄金价格创下历史新高,您对黄金怎么看?

Q: With gold prices at an all-time high, what are your thoughts on gold?

沃伦·巴菲特全球每年开采出价值约 500 亿美元的黄金。黄金的实用价值根本撑不起这么高的价格。1900 年,黄金的交易价是 20 美元/盎司。1933 年,它被重新定价为 35 美元/盎司。1970 年,它开始自由交易,价格又回到了 20 美元。现在涨到了 500 美元。但黄金不产生任何收入,你还要承担存储和保险费用。标普 500 指数或道琼斯指数的表现要好得多,而且

WEB$50 billion worth of gold mined each year. The utility of gold does not command that much gold. In 1900, gold was trading at $20/ounce. It was revalued in ’33 at $35/ounce. In ’70 it traded freely at $20. Now its at $500 today. It offers no income, plus you have storage and insurance expenses. The S&P or Dow has done a lot better, plus

它们还会给你分红。黄金从长期来看是一种很糟糕的投资。这几乎是必然的。它确实没有多少内在价值。石油和其他某些大宗商品的实用价值要大得多。我喜欢那些能持续产生现金的资产;而黄金只是在那儿干放着。

it pays you dividends. Gold is a lousy long-term investment. It has to be. There simply is not that much intrinsic value. Oil and certain other commodities have much more utility. I like assets that are producing money all the time; gold just sits there.

问:安海斯-布希(Anheuser Busch)正在扩大在中国的业务。投资像安海斯-布希这样的美国公司,是投资国际市场的最好方式吗?

Q: Anheuser Busch is growing its presence in China. Is investing in American companies like AB the best way to invest internationally?

沃伦·巴菲特很少有美国公司能从海外业务中获得足够多的价值。通过这种方式来参与一个增长中的国际市场,效果是稀释过的。

WEBFew U.S. companies have enough value coming from foreign operations. It’s a diluted way to get into a growing international market.

至于安海斯-布希公司,中国对它来说是个微小的加分项,但他们在那里总比不在要好。它在我估值中占的比重不大。中国是个相当难投资的地方。我们唯一的直接投资就是中石油。五年前我对中石油还一无所知,

As for Anheuser Busch, China is a tiny plus for the company, but I’d rather they be there than not. It did not account for much of my valuation. China is a tough place to invest. Our only direct investment was in PetroChina. I knew nothing about PetroChina five

尽管它那时已有 50 万名员工。三年前我读到一份报告,讲得很有道理,而那家公司的股价只有其他大型石油公司的三分之一。我宁愿那些资产是在美国,但也不愿意为此付 3 倍的价钱。我读了他们的年报,里面明确写着,他们每年会把 40% 的利润派发给

years ago, despite it having 500,000 employees. I read a report three years ago that made good sense and the company sold for one-third of other big oil companies. I would rather have those assets in the U.S., but wouldn’t want to pay 3x the price. I read their annual reports. It says right in there that they are going to pay out 40% of dividends to

股东。今年的股息是 1 亿美元。而我们这笔投资才花了 4 亿美元。

shareholders each year. The dividend this year was $100 million. We only paid $400 million for the investment.

我不太愿意投资中国的银行和保险公司,因为我不清楚那边在发生什么,也不知道会出什么事。

I’m not comfortable investing in banks and insurance companies in China because I don’t know what is going on or what could happen there.

问:您被问过的最好的问题是什么?

Q: What is the best question you’ve ever been asked?

沃伦·巴菲特我觉得我问过的最好的问题,是问我太太愿不愿意嫁给我。她的回答说不定是她这辈子最差的一个!

WEBI guess the best question I’ve ever asked is my wife to marry me. Her answer might have been her worst!

[巴菲特停顿了片刻] 不如你告诉我,你被问过的最好的问题是什么,我来回答?最好的问题,是那些问我这些年来从生活中学到了什么的问题。年轻时,你是没法知道那些答案的。无论男女,你一生中最重要的决定,就是选择配偶。最重要的工作是养育孩子。孩子生命中的头五年极为重要。盖茨夫妇在养育孩子方面做得很好,并且对这件事想得很深。

[Buffett paused for a moment] Why don’t you tell me the best question you’ve ever been asked and I’ll answer it? The best questions ask what I’ve learned about life over the years. You can’t know those answers when you’re young. For both men and women, the most important decision you’ll ever make is your choice of spouse. The most important job is raising children. The first five years are very important in a child’s life. The Gateses do a good job raising their children and have thought about it a lot.

问:您希望如何定义自己留下的个人与职业遗产?

Q: How would you like to define your personal and professional legacy?

沃伦·巴菲特就伯克希尔而言,我希望后人把它看作一个以非常规方式取得成功的典范——比如我们向管理层放权的方式,以及那些不走寻常路的规则。要是伯克希尔最终不算成功,那再去回顾就挺难堪的。

WEBFor Berkshire, I’d like it to be looked at as a success that accomplished its success in an unorthodox way, i.e. the way we delegate to management, the unconventional rules. It would be tough to look back if Berkshire wasn’t a success.

对我个人而言,如果我去世后伯克希尔依然表现良好,那么这笔钱怎么用就很重要。我不希望伯克希尔依赖我。我也希望那些“股票支票”能造福社会。衡量的标准还在于你的子孙后代,以及他们如何为社会做出贡献。

Personally, if Berkshire does well after I die, then what is done with the money is important. I don’t want Berkshire to be dependent on me. I also want the “stock checks” to benefit society. The test is also based on your children and grandchildren and how they contribute to society.

问:您在财务上取得了巨大的成功。对于那些因为您有钱而想从您身上捞点什么的人,您是怎么筛掉的?

Q: You’ve had a lot of financial success. How do you weed out those that want something from you because you’re rich?

沃伦·巴菲特我多年来结交了很多朋友,所以他们成为我朋友,未必是因为我有钱。对富裕家庭的孩子来说,这个问题更棘手。我自己真的没碰到过那种情况。我收到很多来信,尤其是从监狱里寄来的!他收到过不少囚犯的来信,那些人经常打桥牌。

WEBI’ve had a lot of friends that I’ve acquired over the years, so they aren’t friends necessarily because I’m wealthy. It’s a tougher problem for children of wealthy families. I’ve never really been in that situation. I get a lot of letters, especially from prisons! He’s received letters from prisoners who play a lot of bridge.

有了更多钱,生活其实并没有太大不同。我改变不了内布拉斯加大学对堪萨斯大学那场球赛的比分!我睡觉还是老样子——每晚七小时,睡的还是你在内布拉斯加家具城就能买到的那种床垫。我在跑步机上听 iPod,跟你一样。你们每个人都比 J. D. 洛克菲勒过得还要好。

Life really is not that much different with more money. I can’t change the score of the Nebraska/KU game! I still sleep the same (seven hours a night and on the same mattress you can buy at Nebraska Furniture Mart). I listen to an iPod while I’m on the treadmill just like you can. All of you live better than J.D Rockefeller did.

此刻(作为大学生)你们是在为未来的回报进行前期投资。你们本身就是一笔资产——要做的就是去提升这笔资产。给这笔资产加 1 亿美元,也不会让你有多大改变。

Right now [as college students] you are investing upfront for a future payout. You are an asset - do things to improve that asset. Adding $100 million to that asset won’t change you that much.

问:政府是否应该介入,制止近来美国企业界的那些胡作非为?

Q: Should the government step in to stop the recent shenanigans in corporate America?

沃伦·巴菲特斯皮策所做的事情对社会极为有益。千禧年合伙公司刚以 1.8 亿美元达成和解,他们现在的名声已经彻底毁了。正因为斯皮策所做的一切,出于蒙羞忌惮,你将来在共同基金和保险领域不会再看到那些问题。查理总是说,每年当众绞死几个人就好了,

WEBWhat Spitzer did was wonderful for society. Millennium Partners just settled for $180 million. Their reputation is now destroyed. Because of what Spitzer’s done, you won’t see those problems in the mutual funds and insurance in the future because of the embarrassment. Charlie always says that a few public hangings per year would

对社会帮助无穷……从形而上学的角度说!坏名声比萨班斯-奥克斯利法案之类的法规有效得多。

help society to no end…metaphysically speaking! Bad press will go a lot further than statutes such as Sarbanes-Oxley.

斯皮策有时可能越界,但总体来说,他给社会带来了很多好处。

Spitzer may cross the line at times, but net has done a lot of good for society.