Nomad信函后记
Postamble -
Postamble -
跳转到内容
Skip to content
Main Menu
Main Menu
Home
Home
Philanthropy
Philanthropy
Menu Toggle
Menu Toggle
X-amount
X-amount
Guiding Principles
Guiding Principles
我们在寻找什么?
What are we looking for?
Investing
Investing
Menu Toggle
Menu Toggle
Preamble
Preamble
游牧合伙人的信函
Nomad Partnership Letters
Postamble
Postamble
关于如何思考的思考
Thinking About How to Think
Menu Toggle
Menu Toggle
短期与长期
Short-term vs Long-term
Contact Us
Contact Us
Postamble
Postamble
认为会有人能读到这么后面,也许是我们自作多情了。不过,对于那些坚持读下来的人,恐怕都值得祝贺。这些信函就在这里,它们是我们的代表作(或者,读完它们之后,有些人可能更愿意用罗温·阿特金森的《黑爵士》系列剧中鲍德里克说错的那个词——“出色的章鱼”来形容)。那些想要再多读一些的人(我们显然又在自作多情了),可以去看威廉·格林的《更富有、更睿智、更快乐》这本书。威廉写出了一本我们很希望自己能写成,但知道自己缺乏必要技能的书。我们相信你会读得很开心。
We may be flattering ourselves to think that anyone will get this far but, for those that struggled through, congratulations are probably in order. And there they are, the Nomad Letters, our magnum opus (or, having read them, some might prefer “magnificent octopus” as Baldrick’s malapropism goes in Rowan Atkinson’s Black Adder series). Those that wish to read more (we are definitely flattering ourselves) can do so in William Green’s book “Richer, Wiser, Happier”. William has written the kind of book that we would love to have written but know that we lack the requisite skills. We are sure you will enjoy the read.
当我们写 2013 年 12 月的信函时,并不知道那会是我们的最后一封。但几个月后,投资组合被清算,资金返还给了合伙人,我们继续前行。我们对那个最后阶段一点都不喜欢:卖出多年积累起来的头寸感觉不对,客户们表现得极为得体,即便如此,从别人那里拿走东西仍然是一场尴尬的谈话,尤其是从你喜欢的人那里,而且关闭一个运营机构还有管理上的头疼事。在心理上,这一切都感觉不对劲。
When we wrote the December 2013 letter, we did not know that it would be our last but, a few months later, the portfolio had been liquidated, funds returned to our partners and on we go. We did not like that final phase one bit: selling stakes built up over years felt wrong, the clients were grace itself but, even so, it is still an awkward conversation to take something away from someone, especially people that you like, and there was the administrative headaches of winding up an operation. Psychologically it all felt wrong.
那么,我们为什么要关门呢?在做这种重大决定时,通常会有多种力量在推拉:监管方向确实令人恼火,监管工具也不必要地生硬,但同时,我们也希望感到自己不必持续向一个走马灯般轮换的利益相关方解释我们做了什么和没做什么。我们还觉得已经从投资过程中榨干了所有能榨取的东西,继续下去无非是重复劳动罢了。毕竟,我们已拥有了所需要的一切——只是少数几家卓越的企业——而我们也不太可能为了买入另一股菲律宾水泥公司的“烟蒂股”而卖掉其中任何一家,对吧?而那股拉力,就是独立和新冒险的前景,这一次是摸索如何将资金复利起来让他人受益。我们在一个年纪(40 多岁)结束,这个年纪迫使我们建立些新东西(你不能永远躺在沙滩上),而且,希望我们能活得足够久,也看到自己行动的结果;我们得品尝自己做的饭,可谓如此。那些上了年纪才退休,随后不久就去世的前辈们,并非总有机会做到这一点。而且,正如我们在序言中所说,我们也并没有完全离开投资。
So, why did we close? With big decisions like that there is often a mixture of forces pushing and pulling: The direction of regulation was certainly irksome and the tools of regulation unnecessarily blunt but, also, we wanted to feel that we did not have to justify actions, and inactions, on an ongoing basis to a revolving door of interested parties. We also felt we had wrung all that we could out of the investment process and to continue would have been to rinse and repeat, as it were. After all, we had what we needed, just a few superb businesses and we were unlikely to sell any of those to fund the purchase of another cigar butt, Philippine cement company, were we? The pull was the prospect of independence and a new adventure, this time working out how to recycle the funds for others to benefit. We wound up at an age (mid 40s) when it forced us to build something new (you can’t sit on the beach forever) and, hopefully, we would live long enough to also see the consequences of our actions; we would have to eat our own cooking, as it were. Previous generations that retired in old age and died soon after, have not always had that opportunity. And, as we said in the preamble, we have not entirely left investing behind either.
我们认识的许多成功且富有的人,对金钱到底意味着什么也感到有些困惑。投资者似乎不需要传统意义上的工作,就能靠思考走向成功,而资本主义中选股带来的回报可能极为巨大。资本配置者因他们的努力而获得回报是一回事,但在我们看来,在某个 X 金额之上的一切都以个人身份认同,并非一条建设更美好世界的途径。我们猜想,如果你读到了我们信函的结尾,那么你是个好人,并且已经知道这一点。如果好的投资是少数人的运动,那么好的慈善就是少数人运动中的少数人运动。我们这个群体可以努力从社会的边缘走向常态。我们希望你能加入我们的旅程。
Many of the successful and wealthy people we know are a little mystified by what the money really means. Investors can think their way to success without seeming to work in the traditional sense and the payoff in capitalism from stock picking can be extraordinary. It is one thing for capital allocators to be rewarded for their efforts but, in our opinion, taking personal identity in everything above X-amount is not a route to building a better world. We suspect that if you made it to the end of our letters, then you are one of the good guys and know that already. If good investing is a minority sport, then good philanthropy is a minority sport for those that do minority sports. Our band could do with moving from the fringes of society to becoming the norm. We hope you will join us on the journey.
尼克·斯利普与加伊斯·扎卡里亚,2021 年春。
Nick Sleep and Qais Zakaria, Spring 2021.
I.G.Y. 基金会是一家在英格兰和威尔士慈善委员会注册的慈善法人组织,注册号 1155564。
The I.G.Y. Foundation is a Charitable Incorporated Organisation registered with the Charity Commission of England and Wales, Registered Number 1155564.