2013 年 Charlie Rose:Warren, Howard G., and Howard W. Buffett

2013-10-22 · Charlie Rose · 原文约 9251 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

沃伦·巴菲特、霍华德·G·巴菲特和霍华德·W·巴菲特

Warren, Howard G., and Howard W. Buffett

2013 年 10 月 22 日,星期二

Tuesday 10/22/2013

https://charlierose.com/videos/23762

https://charlierose.com/videos/23762

沃伦·巴菲特、霍华德·G·巴菲特和霍华德·W·巴菲特讨论了慈善事业应对贫困的各种方式。

Warren, Howard G., and Howard W. Buffett discuss the ways philanthropy can confront poverty.

查理·罗斯:他是我和本栏目多年的老朋友。作为投资者,他凭借天才般的头脑跻身世界最富有者之列。他承诺捐出大部分财富,并于 2006 年向比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会捐赠了 310 亿美元。他还鼓励子女投身慈善事业。沃伦·巴菲特的儿子霍华德·格雷厄姆是霍华德·G·巴菲特基金会的主席兼首席执行官。他还是一本新书的作者,书名叫《四十个机会:在饥饿的世界中寻找希望》。他的儿子霍华德·沃伦·巴菲特是哥伦比亚大学的讲师,也是父亲基金会的受托人。他结合自己在政策制定和慈善方面的经历,为这本书贡献了内容。我很高兴能第一次邀请他们三位齐聚这张餐桌——祖父、儿子和孙子。这感觉怎么样?

Charlie Rose: and a longtime friend of mine and this program. His genius as an investor made him one of the world's wealthiest men. He pledged to give away most of his fortune and donated $31 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2006. He's also encouraged his children to engage in philanthropy. Warren Buffett's son Howard Graham is the Chair and CEO of the Howard G. Buffett Foundation. He's also the author of a new book, it is called "Forty Chances: Finding Hope in a Hungry World." His son, Howard Warren Buffett, is a lecturer at Columbia University and trustee of his father's foundation. He's contributed to the book with his own experiences in policy making and philanthropy. So I'm pleased to have all of them here together at this table for the first time -- grandfather, son and grandson. So how does it feel?

沃伦·巴菲特:感觉好极了。

Warren Buffett: It feels great.

查理·罗斯:确实很棒。

Charlie Rose: It really does.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的,是的,我为他们感到非常骄傲。

Warren Buffett: Yes, yes, I am very proud of them.

查理·罗斯:你在开场白里提到了这一点。那我们就从这本书聊起吧。显然,因为我认识你母亲,也了解这背后——你从中学到了什么,以及你还从他们身上额外学到了什么。跟我说说,你写《四十个机会》这本书,到底想达成什么目标?

Charlie Rose: You talk about that in your introductory remarks. So let me just start with the book. Clearly because I knew your mother and understood how -- what's -- what's involved here is what you have learned, but also what you learned in addition from them. Give me a sense of what it was that you were trying to accomplish with "Forty Chances".

霍华德·G·巴菲特:嗯,你知道,我父母都非常出色,他们给了我、我弟弟和妹妹很多机会。就我而言,我花了很多时间周游世界,遇见了很多人,看到了很多事情,我就觉得,这些经历也许值得分享。我开始是打算写本教科书,但霍华德告诉我,他说,“爸,你得想得再大一点。”所以我就想,分享一些经历呗,而且我们尝试过很多不同的事情,失败的比成功的多,我觉得这本身就是一个重要的信息。

Howard G. Buffett: Well, you know, both my mom and dad were phenomenal in terms of the opportunity they have given me and my brother and sister. And in my case, I spent a lot of time traveling around the world and met a lot of people, seen a lot of things and I just felt that, you know, those experiences are something that hopefully are worth sharing. I -- I start out with the idea of doing a textbook and Howie told me, he says "Dad you have to think a little bigger than that." So I -- I just thought that, you know, sharing some of the experiences and, you know, we have tried a lot of different things and we have failed at more than we've succeeded and I just feel like that's an important message.

查理·罗斯:你能从失败中学到东西吗?

Charlie Rose: You can learn from failures?

霍华德·G·巴菲特:当然可以。

Howard G. Buffett: Absolutely, yes.

查理·罗斯:为什么书名要叫《四十个机会》?

Charlie Rose: Why the title "Forty Chances?"

霍华德·G·巴菲特:嗯,我正要说到一件事,你们大多数观众可能不会太感兴趣,叫“种植者学校”——冬天的时候,你去约翰迪尔经销店坐下来,会有不同的主讲人试图告诉你如何改善——如何提高你的收成。

Howard G. Buffett: Well, I was going to something that most of your viewers will not get too excited about it's called Planter's School and it's a -- you go in the winter time and you go to the John Deere dealership and sit down and different speakers will try to tell you how to improve your -- how you do on the crop.

查理·罗斯:对。

Charlie Rose: Right.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:而且,他大致提到,你实际上只有 40 个季节——40 个生长季,去做到最好。我后来就把它转化成这样的想法:你其实只有大约 40 年真正算得上黄金岁月。

Howard G. Buffett: And you know, he kind of talked about how you only really have 40 seasons -- 40 growing seasons to do the best job you can. And I kind of then translated that into thinking about well you really have about 40 really prime years.

查理·罗斯:是的。

Charlie Rose: Yes.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:我开玩笑说他 80 岁。

Howard G. Buffett: I was joking and say he has 80.

查理·罗斯:是的,我知道——是这位父亲。

Charlie Rose: Yes I know -- in this dad.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:对,不过,你知道,就像一节小小的永备电池,但说实话,大多数人在年富力强的时候,大概有 40 年时间去切实改变点什么、达成目标,或者去追逐他们想实现的任何事。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes, but, you know, a little Eveready battery but, you know, the truth is most people have, you know, in their prime they have about 40 years to really change things or achieve their goals or whatever it is they want to set their sights on.

查理·罗斯:你现在仍然把自己首先看做一个农民吗?

Charlie Rose: You still consider yourself first and foremost a farmer.

沃伦·巴菲特:我就是这样,没错。

Warren Buffett: I love it, yes.

查理·罗斯:是的。

Charlie Rose: Yes.

沃伦·巴菲特:对,我绝不想放弃这个身份。

Warren Buffett: Yes, I would never want to give it up.

查理·罗斯:你上次过来、我们和沃伦一起聊的时候,你说你正处于一个转型过程中,希望更有效地影响决策者——这本书就是这一转型的成果吗?

Charlie Rose: When you were last here and we talked with Warren, you said you were in the middle of a transition to impact decision makers more effectively, is this book the culmination of this?

霍华德·G·巴菲特:这本书在当中占了很大分量。是的,我真正学到的教训,特别是通过在冲突地区的工作——在那里,你必须有政府参与,你知道,如果你不——如果你不影响到政策,即使你有一群非常好的人,但如果他们在相当糟糕的政策之下做事,他们也不会成功。所以我们确实开始把政策倡导纳入自己的工具箱。

Howard G. Buffett: This book is a big part of that. Yes, I learned a lesson particularly working in conflict areas and there is where you really have to have government engagement that you know if you don't -- if you don't impact policy, you know, if you are working -- you can have great people but if you are working under really poor policy they are not going to succeed. So we really started to embrace advocacy as part of our tool.

查理·罗斯:是的,而且你相信我们在消除贫困这件事上能够做得更好,好很多?

Charlie Rose: Yes and you believe that we can do a significantly better job at trying to eliminate poverty?

霍华德·G·巴菲特:绝对相信。我觉得问题之一是,我们在太多时候被束缚在过去的经验里了。你知道,技术在变,但我觉得思维也得变,而且正在变。我是说,你知道,今天投身慈善的年轻人,他们想法不一样。他们更有创新精神,我觉得他们更专注——这些这样思考、这样推动的人,我觉得要助力改变一些规模更大的机构。

Howard G. Buffett: Absolutely. I think one of the things is we have been living too much in history and you know, technology has changed but also I think thinking has to change and thinking is changing, I mean you know, the younger people in philanthropy today think differently. They are more innovative I think they are more focused and those -- those people that are thinking and driving that way, I think have to help change some of the bigger organizations.

查理·罗斯:我想到沃伦有一次说过的话,觉得很有意思:最好在你还能自己做决定的时候就先把钱捐掉,别等到 90 岁,淌着口水,腿上还坐着个金发女郎。

Charlie Rose: I'm amused at what Warren once said that it's better if you give away your money while you can make the decisions before you are 90 and drooling with a blonde sitting on your lap.

沃伦·巴菲特:没错,没错。那个说法我也想试着学一学。我觉得淌口水那部分我已经拿下了——金发女郎在哪儿?

Warren Buffett: That's right. That's right. I try to try that one too. I think I got the drooling part down, where is the blonde?

查理·罗斯:这次采访也谈到了你的母亲。我想大家应该都知道,在她去世前,我们做过一次很好的对话。下面是其中一段节选,从中能看到她本人以及她对整个家庭的影响。请看。

Charlie Rose: There is also your mom. And as everyone I think knows, we did a wonderful conversation with her before she died, and here is an excerpt of that in which we see her and her impact on the family. Here it is.

苏珊·汤普森·巴菲特:我想他希望人们记住,他有多喜欢讲那个“卵巢彩票”的事,他确实总爱讲。而我跟他一样,对这个概念深信不疑。如果他能让年轻人意识到,“我很幸运,我刚好生在了这里”,然后更进一步,去想“对于那些没那么幸运的人,包括这里的人,我又能做些什么”——我知道,这对他来说意义非常重大。

Susan Thompson Buffett: I think he hopes that people remember how much he liked to talk about the ovarian lottery he does that. And I believe that so deeply like he does, and if he can make young people realize I'm lucky I was just going here and then take it a step further and what can I do for people that are not so lucky including people here, I know that means a lot to him.

查理·罗斯:沃伦,你在序言里这样写道:“在这场卵巢彩票中,我的孩子们抽到了一些幸运签。许多尝到这种好运的人,反应就是单纯享受自己在人生中的位置,并想方设法确保自己的孩子也能享受同样的好处。这种做法可以理解,但如果同时带着一种‘我做得到,为什么别人做不到’的沾沾自喜态度,那就令人反感了。”请你强调或帮我们理解一下“卵巢彩票”的重要性,因为它道出了我们能出生在这个国家是多么幸运。

Charlie Rose: So you say this, Warren, in the introduction, "In this ovarian lottery my children received some lucky tickets. Many people who experienced such good fortune react by simply enjoying their position in life and try to make sure that their children enjoy similar benefits. This approach is understandable but it can be distasteful if it's accompanied by a smug 'if I can do it why can't everybody else' attitude." Emphasize or help us understand the significance of the ovarian lottery, because, it says something about how lucky we are to be born in this country.

沃伦·巴菲特:查理,我出生在这个国家,而 1930 年代我出生时,这种出生概率只有 30 到 40 分之一。如果我出生在其他地方,我的人生绝对不会像在这里一样。

Warren Buffett: Charlie I was born in this country and the odds were 30 or 40 to one against it when I was born in the 1930. If I had been born some place else my life would have been nothing like it has been here.

查理·罗斯:那说的就是做资本配置。

Charlie Rose: It was the allocating capital.

沃伦·巴菲特:我可能会在孟加拉国转来转去,见人就说“我搞资本配置”,想找份工作……

Warren Buffett: I would be wandering around in Bangladesh saying I allocate capital and looking for a job.

查理·罗斯:然后就报名参加了——

Charlie Rose: And was sign up for --

沃伦·巴菲特:你知道,我——我很走运,碰上了好父母。我也很走运,出生在了那个年代。你瞧,我的脑回路碰巧就适合在一个庞大的资本主义体系里如鱼得水。我遇到过各种各样的好运。这完全有可能,你知道,结局截然不同。

Warren Buffett: You know I was -- I was fortunate with my parent. I was fortunate at the time I was born. You know, I happen to be wired in a way that works very well on a big capitalistic system. I've had all kinds of good luck. It could have been, you know, dramatically different.

查理·罗斯:但数百万其他人没有那样的运气。他们没能从卵巢彩票中受益。

Charlie Rose: But millions of other people haven't had that. They have not benefited from the ovarian lottery.

沃伦·巴菲特:奥巴马说过“没人能单靠自己成功”,这话让他挨了不少批评。呃,我——我不知道别人怎么样,反正我自己绝不是单打独斗过来的。我的意思是,诺曼底那儿有一万座十字架墓碑——没有他们的牺牲,我站不到今天的位置。还有葛底斯堡的那些人——说到底,我们谁都不是靠自己走到今天的。我极其、极其幸运,生来就好像为这个时代、这个地方量身定做的一样。但很多人没那么幸运,市场体系把财富雨点一样洒在我身上,却把海量的人抛在了后头。

Warren Buffett: Obama got a certain amount of criticism when he said you know nobody does it alone. Well I -- I don't know about other people I did not do it alone. I mean there are -- there are 10,000 crosses over there at Normandy that -- and they will need to be where I am today. There are people of Gettysburg, I mean, it's -- none of us do it alone. And I have been very, very lucky to be sort designed for this time and this place. But a lot of people aren't lucky and the market system showers things on me and it leaves an awful lot of people behind.

查理·罗斯:我得提一句,您的儿子和孙子都叫霍华德。

Charlie Rose: I should take note of the fact that son and grandson are named Howard.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。

Warren Buffett: Yes.

查理·罗斯:您父亲也叫霍华德,是您生命中的英雄。

Charlie Rose: Your dad is named Howard as well, your hero in life.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。一点没错。

Warren Buffett: Yes. Absolutely. Yes.

查理·罗斯:思路是这样——如果我们的目标是大幅消除贫困,我们该怎么做?应该采取什么步骤?我一会儿请您儿子来谈谈。

Charlie Rose: The idea is that you can do what if our goal is to eliminate poverty, to a large extent? What's the step that we ought to take? And I will bring in your son in a moment.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:是的,我觉得我在书中想做的一部分事情,就是借助我们的经历,来讲一讲其中一些答案。我认为,当理念与现实发生冲突时——就像我们最近在国会看到的那样——那些活在现实中的人,往往就输了。所以,在解决这个问题上,我们需要更严肃的领导力。当人们谈论削减 SNAP 计划时,那些人并不承受这一行动的后果,他们需要明白,到底是谁在承受这些后果。所以,就政策而言,提高意识和倡导是关键。另外,我们还需要做的另一件事是——我总是说,历史上,企业一直扮演着坏人的角色,而人们看待慈善时,会说,嗯,我没法——他们做这个、做那个,所以我真的不能和他们合作。而事实是,企业创造就业,就业才是让人们永久摆脱贫困的途径。当然,在很多情况下这没那么简单,但我们必须对某些解决方案持有不同的思维方式。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes, I think part of what I try to write in the book is use our experiences and talk about some of those answers. I think when philosophy kind of clashes with reality, which what we've seen in our Congress recently you know reality with those people living in reality kind of lose. And so you know we need to have more serious leadership in terms of addressing this issue. So when people talk about cutting the SNAP program, you know, those people don't suffer the consequences from that action and they need to understand who does suffer those consequences. So really, awareness and advocacy are a key thing in terms of the policy. And then, you know, another thing we need to do is we -- I always say, you know, historically, business has been kind of the bad guy and in philanthropy people have looked at it and said well you know, I can't -- they are doing this or they are doing some things so I can't really partner with them. And the truth is businesses create jobs and jobs are what permanently bring people out of poverty. Now it's not that simple in a lot of cases but we have to have a different mindset about what some of the solutions are.

查理·罗斯:跟我说说你吧,你学到了什么,以及你在这本书里扮演的角色。

Charlie Rose: I -- tell me about you and what you've learned and your role in this book.

霍华德·W·巴菲特:嗯,能参与其中我感到无比荣幸。过去 15 年里,我有机会跟着父亲走遍全世界,亲身经历了无数事——这些正是我们想在《四十个机会》里捕捉的。不过对我来说,从小到大,我拥有任何人能期望的最了不起的两位榜样——你们知道,我们一家人在冰雪皇后吃早午餐时会围坐聊天,但他们——他们依然是令人难以置信的人。我祖父打造出了世界上最庞大的财富之一,又把这笔财富变成了历史上最伟大的馈赠之一。正因如此,他赋予我父亲改变世界的使命和能力——而这份机遇,我父亲又用来与我分享,努力去改善世界各地人们的生活。

Howard W. Buffett: Well, I am just honored to be involved and over the last 15 years I have been able to travel with my dad around the world and take in so many experiences and that's a part of what we've tried to capture in "Forty Chances". But for me growing up I have had the two most incredible role models anyone could ask for and -- and you know, we sit around at Dairy Queen at family brunch and have conversations but they are -- they are still unbelievable individuals. You know my grandfather built what was one of the world's greatest fortunes and turned it into one of history's greatest gifts. And in doing that he empowered my dad to try and change the world and -- and that opportunity is what my dad has used to share with me to try and improve lives everywhere.

查理·罗斯:跟我说说 1969 年你去布拉格的事。

Charlie Rose: Tell me about your visit to Prague in 1969.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:是的,那是我人生中一个巨大的转变,也是我做过最棒的事情之一。要不是我父亲,这事根本成不了,因为我母亲十分不想让我去,我们吵了又吵。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes, that was a -- that was a big change in my life and one of the best things I ever did and I wouldn't -- I wouldn't have gotten it done if it wasn't for my dad because my mother did not want me to go and we argued and argued.

查理·罗斯:当时——

Charlie Rose: At the time --

霍华德·G·巴菲特:是的,我完全不知道布拉格当时发生了什么,我只知道在我们家做交换生的薇拉说,过来吧。于是我说我想过去。我是坐飞机去的——我就是那种心情变得很快的孩子——飞过去的时候,我往下看,你知道我喜欢大型机械,降落时看到遍地坦克,突然间觉得这太酷了。可等我面对面站在检查证件的士兵面前时,我想,天啊,这可一点都不酷。所以,你知道,我学到了很多,我当时一天都吃不上三顿饭。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes, I had no concept of what was going on in Prague, I just know that Vera who stayed with us as an exchange student said come on over. So I said I want to go over and you know I am flying in, it's one of those kids where the mood changes quite -- quite quickly because I am flying in and I am looking at you know I love big -- big machines and you are landing and you've got all of these tanks and all of a sudden this is really cool and then when I am standing face to face with the soldiers who was looking for ID I am going boy this is not so cool. And so you know but I learned so much, you know, I didn't get three meals a day.

查理·罗斯:嗯。

Charlie Rose: Yes.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:我们周日烧热水洗澡。我是说,你知道,那一切太不一样了——你看到人们被压制,被秘密警察殴打,我亲眼看到了这一切,这和看书完全不同,所以这确实改变了我,你知道——那是我第一次感到无助。然后我觉得自己真该做点什么,但什么都做不了,我想你知道,后来这一直深深印在我心里。

Howard G. Buffett: We boiled hot water on Sundays to take a bath. I mean, you know, it was just so different and -- and you saw people who were subdued, people who were beat up by secret police, I mean I saw all this and to see it is different than reading a book and so it really changed, you know -- it is the first time I felt helpless. And then I felt like I really should be doing something but I can't do anything and I think you know later on in life that really stuck with me.

查理·罗斯:什么事让你最骄傲?

Charlie Rose: What is it that makes you proudest?

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,我的三个孩子我都引以为傲,而他们并不非得做现在做的事。我的意思是,他们不是拥有多得离谱的钱,但足够他们可以把时间花在乡村俱乐部之类的场合。

Warren Buffett: Well I am proud of all three of my children but they -- but that they don't have to do what they are doing. I mean they don't have unbelievable amounts of money but they have enough so they can -- they can spend their time in a country club or something of the sort.

查理·罗斯:对。

Charlie Rose: Right.

沃伦·巴菲特:至于霍华德,我不知道他去了多少个国家,但他确实在努力帮助他的同胞。不幸的是,我身边有人能帮他做到这一点,但那份精力、想象力,还有从错误中学习的能力,全都属于他自己。

Warren Buffett: And then Howie I don't know how many countries he has been in, but -- but he is -- he is trying to help his fellow human being. Unfortunately, I've got somebody that can help him do that but -- but the energy and the imagination and learning from mistakes and all of that belongs to him.

查理·罗斯:除了务农和农业方面的这种直觉、经验和学识之外,你还有一样东西——摄影。我们这儿有几样东西可以看看。告诉我,是你太太带你接触相机的,对吧?

Charlie Rose: One other thing you have other than this sort of instinct for farming and agriculture and experience and learning is photography and we will see a couple of things here, several things. Tell me, your wife introduced you to cameras, yes?

霍华德·G·巴菲特:是的,是的。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes, yes.

查理·罗斯:这对你产生了什么影响?它把你变成了什么样的人?

Charlie Rose: And what did it do for you? What did it turn you into?

霍华德·G·巴菲特:我想有一点是,她——她首先会告诉你,这教会了我一些耐心。如果你想拍到猎豹捕猎的画面,你就得等。而且——

Howard G. Buffett: I think for one thing, she -- the first thing she would tell you is it taught me some patience. If you want to get a cheetah on a kill you have to wait. And --

查理·罗斯:猎豹可不会等你。

Charlie Rose: Cheetahs are not about waiting for you.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:对,一点都不错,这可不是你能用遥控器操控的。所以它确实教会了我一些耐心,但是——你看,我就是看着——我在农场里开始看到一些东西,最初我就是想捕捉下来。后来我开始旅行,最初我们在自然保护领域做了很多工作,那非常有趣。你知道的,大象、猎豹、狮子,所有那些孩子们喜欢看、我们也都很喜欢的动物。但是,后来我明白了,摄影是一种极其强大的工具,可以改变人们的想法,让他们——你没办法——如果你有足够有冲击力的照片,人们就无法把目光移开。你无法否认事情正在发生,所以对我来说,它的——我记得我在书里写过,如果说得没错的话,它就像是一把真相之枪。我的意思是,它就是迫使人们去面对现实。

Howard G. Buffett: No that is exactly right there is no remote control that you could like yes. So it did, it taught me some patience but I -- you know I just saw -- I started seeing things, you know, on the farm originally that I just kind of wanted to capture. And then when I started traveling and originally we did a lot in conservation so it was a lot of fun. You know, the elephants and cheetahs and lions and all of those things that kids like to see and we all love. But, you know, then I've learned that photography is a really powerful tool to change people's minds, to make them -- you can't -- if you've got a strong enough photograph, people can't turn away from it. You can't deny that it's happening and so to me, it's -- I think I write in the book if I remember right that it's look truth gun. I mean it just you know it -- it really forces people to deal with the reality.

查理·罗斯:有人说,一张图胜过千言万语。

Charlie Rose: As somebody said effectively a picture is worth a thousand words.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:是,完全没问题。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes, absolutely.

查理·罗斯:好,来看看这几张。我想请你描述一下这张照片——一个瘦骨嶙峋的退伍军人向旗帜敬礼。

Charlie Rose: Ok take a look at some of these. These is a -- I want you to describe the photograph. This is an emaciated veteran saluting a flag.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:是的,这是埃弗雷特——来自西弗吉尼亚州的埃弗雷特。埃弗雷特是那种我原本并不打算专程去拍他的情况。但我们看见了他,他出来取邮件,我看到他的肋骨,就知道他营养不良。于是我们调头折返。那张照片之所以很有意思,是因为我在一条繁忙公路的另一侧等着过马路,我的同事已经先过去了,站在楼梯脚下。我隔着马路喊:“问问他是不是退伍军人,因为他插着国旗。”他立刻做出的回应是——敬礼。之后我们花了不少时间和他交谈。他是那种为国家服务过却没得到公平对待的人。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes this is Everett -- this is Everett in West Virginia. Everett was one of those circumstances where I had not gone to really photograph Everett but we saw him and came out to get his mail and I saw his ribs and knew he was malnourished. And so we turned around and went back and that picture is really interesting because I was on the other side of a very busy road waiting to cross, my colleague had already gone off he's standing at the bottom of the stairs there and I yell across the street, I said ask Everett if he's a veteran because he had the flag and immediately what he did is he saluted. And then we spent quite a bit of time talking to him but he is an example of somebody who served this country and hasn't been treated fairly.

查理·罗斯:这是一张你在塞内加尔拍的照片,照片里的男孩被锁着铁链。这是怎么回事?

Charlie Rose: Here is a picture of a boy you photographed in Senegal who was in chains. What is this story?

霍华德·G·巴菲特:没错,这就是——我的相机差点给我惹大麻烦的地方。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes this is a -- this is where my camera almost got me in a lot of trouble.

查理·罗斯:是的。

Charlie Rose: Yes.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:我们进去了,我只带了一台相机,简直不可思议,我们进入那片区域,看到大约 40 到 50 个年轻男孩,手脚都戴着镣铐和锁链。他们基本上被困在一个宗教体系里,父母把孩子交给那儿的宗教头目。这些孩子主要靠乞讨为生,如果他们在街上讨不到足够的钱,就会受到这样的对待。

Howard G. Buffett: We got in, I was able to take one camera, it was amazing we got into this area of about 40 or 50 young boys in shackles and chains and they basically are caught in a religious system that their parents give a child to the who is the head of the religion there. And basically those children beg for money, if they don't get enough money on the street then they are treated like this.

查理·罗斯:好,第三张幻灯片上是亚美尼亚一位 82 岁老太太安娜的照片。

Charlie Rose: Ok the third slide is a picture of a woman in Armenia, 82- year old Anna.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:这是安娜。我觉得霍伊应该跟你们讲讲这个故事。

Howard G. Buffett: This is Anna. I think Howie should tell you this story.

霍华德·W·巴菲特:是的,我们在亚美尼亚乡下开了好几个小时的车,差不多是偶然间,我们在这栋房子前停下来,安娜把我们请了进去。她讲了她的故事:她姐姐有精神疾病,她晚上不得不把姐姐锁起来,因为姐姐曾试图杀她。你现在看到的画面里,她同时站在厨房、卧室和门廊里——其实是同一个镜头。那一刻我特别难受,不管是什么原因,这个场景让我情绪上受到极大冲击。我和父亲在全世界见过无数难以形容的场面,但安娜的故事以一种我没想到的方式触动了我。

Howard W. Buffett: Right you know we had been driving through the country side in Armenia for hours at this point and I think almost by happenstance we stopped at this house and we were invited in by Anna. And she told her story about her sister who was mentally ill that she had to lock up at night because her sister tried to kill her. And what you are seeing is you are -- you are seeing her standing in both her kitchen and her bedroom and her porch all at once there. And it was one time that I had an incredible difficulty with it, because whatever it was about the situation it just -- it hit me so hard emotionally and, you know, my dad and I have seen indescribable instances around the world and Anna's story just touched me in a way I was not expecting.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:查理,我很快再补一句。我告诉霍华德,我们在南部——我说回家路上我们要去亚美尼亚。他说,爸,我不想去亚美尼亚,亚美尼亚有什么,他确实不想去。我说,你知道吗,我刚去过那里。

Howard G. Buffett: Charlie if I could add really quickly, I told Howie we are in south -- I said on the way home we are going to go Armenia. And he said Dad, I don't want to go to Armenia and what's in Armenia and he really didn't want to go and I said you know I was just there.

查理·罗斯:这就是代际差异。

Charlie Rose: Generational difference there.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:我跟他说,“你会看到从没见过的东西”。我带他去过孟加拉国、印度、整个非洲、还有中美洲,我想让他看到的是这样一个社会——当你跟人聊天的时候,这些人本来有好工作,我们跟失业的教授聊过,他们没了车、没了房,再也没法送孩子上学了。这跟我们在很多国家工作时看到的环境很不一样。我想让他体验一下那种生活。

Howard G. Buffett: And you know, I said you are going to see something you've never seen. I have taken him to Bangladesh and India and all of Africa and central America and what I wanted him to see was a society that when you talked to people, you know, this is -- this was a situation where people had good jobs, we talked to professors who are out of work we -- you know, they have lost cars they've lost houses, they can't send their kids to school anymore. It is a very different environment than what we see in a lot of countries we work. And I wanted him to have that experience.

查理·罗斯:我认为比尔·盖茨和梅琳达·盖茨一直在做的事情之一,就是四处走访,用自己的眼睛、自己的……亲自去实地看看。

Charlie Rose: I think that's been one of the things that Bill and Melinda Gates have done is to travel and firsthand experience with their own eyes and their own you know visit.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的,你不能——你不能坐在帕克大道的一栋楼里就理解这一点。

Warren Buffett: Yes, yes you can't -- you can't sit in a building on Park Avenue and really understand this.

查理·罗斯:是的。您认为——当前围绕慈善的讨论应该集中在哪些方面?因为“捐赠誓言”已经引发了部分讨论。很多人都站了出来——作为其中一环,他们定期聚会,试图弄清楚如何更有效地捐赠。但我们是否还需要一场关于慈善、关于慈善如何发挥作用以及为什么应该参与其中的更广泛的讨论?

Charlie Rose: Yes. You believe -- what ought to be the debate about philanthropy now because the Giving Pledge has elicited some of that. People stepped up -- and they are having meetings as part of that in which they try to understand how to give more effectively. But do we need a bigger debate about philanthropy and how it can be applied and -- and why you should be engaged?

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,慈善并非按市场体系运作。我们在冰雪皇后(Dairy Queen)卖迪利棒的时候,至今也搞不懂人们为什么喜欢它。市场体系的妙处在于,它会针对你的想法和产品给你反馈;但慈善不一样,你要是把钱交给别人,他们总会想方设法让你继续掏钱,他们会追捧你、奉承你做各种事。所以你得不到市场体系的那种检验——这让事情变得难得多。你做错事可以错很久,没有任何东西会拦住你。所以做慈善比经商更需要本事。

Warren Buffett: Well, philanthropy does not operate with a market system, I mean when we sell the Dilley Bars at Dairy Queen we still don't know why the people like Dilley Bars. The market system is wonderful in terms of the feedback it gives you on ideas and products and all of that and philanthropy you know if you are handing money to people, they are going to say keep handing it one way or another and they'll flatter you and do all kinds of things. So you get -- so you do not have a market system test and that -- that makes it much more difficult and you can do the wrong thing for a long time and nothing will stop it. So it -- it requires, it requires more ability than business.

查理·罗斯:我们是不是——是不是说,把钱捐出去比赚钱更需要本事?

Charlie Rose: Do we have -- it requires more ability to give money away than make it?

沃伦·巴菲特:哦,绝对如此,绝对如此。没法比。

Warren Buffett: Oh, absolutely, absolutely. There is no comparison.

查理·罗斯:没错。事实上,这正是你把钱捐给比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会的原因,因为你——

Charlie Rose: Yes. In fact that's why you gave the money to Bill and Melinda Gates because you --

沃伦·巴菲特:还有我的孩子们。

Warren Buffett: And the children.

查理·罗斯:对,还有孩子们,是因为你看重他们能够卓有成效——

Charlie Rose: And the children because you were admiring of the fact that you could be effective --

沃伦·巴菲特:看重他们投入其中的精力、智慧,还有终其一生做这件事的决心。这很重要。

Warren Buffett: The energy they would bring to it the intelligence, the lifelong commitment, I mean that's -- that's important.

查理·罗斯:那你在比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会里扮演什么角色?

Charlie Rose: So what's your role at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?

沃伦·巴菲特:开支票。其实是把股票凭证寄过去——我在背面签个字就行了。这跟我对待自己孩子们的基金会的角色是一样的。

Warren Buffett: Writing checks. Actually it is sending over stock certificates -- I just endorse them. But it is the same role I have with my children.

查理·罗斯:但你知道,你的作用远不止于此。

Charlie Rose: But you know, it's more than that.

沃伦·巴菲特:不,没有。

Warren Buffett: No, no.

查理·罗斯:我的意思是,你——你有意想要去激励别人。

Charlie Rose: I mean you -- you have a sense of -- of wanting to inspire.

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,这个——不过,如果他们没有跟我相同的目标,我也不会和他们合作。他们的慈善事业建立在这样一个根本理念上:每条生命都具有同等价值。我的孩子们也相信这一点,他们还年轻,愿意像我的孩子们正在做的那样,把余生都投入进去。所以,我有——你知道,有人在替我打理这件事,做得远比我亲自去做要好,而我恰好也热爱自己现在做的事。而且,幸运的是,这又往往会增加可用的慈善资源。

Warren Buffett: Well and -- but I wouldn't have joined with them if they didn't have the same goals there. Their philanthropy is grounded around the proposition that every life has equal value. And my children believe th same thing and -- and they are young and they are willing to devote their -- the rest of their lives to it as my children are doing. So I -- I've got these -- you know people working for me that do it far better than I would do it and I happen to love what I do. And fortunately that tends to increase the amount of resources available for philanthropy.

查理·罗斯:还是天天跳着踢踏舞去上班,是吧?

Charlie Rose: Still tiptoeing to work, are you?

沃伦·巴菲特:跳着踢踏舞去上班,我在那儿高兴地翻跟头呢。

Warren Buffett: Tap dancing, tap dancing to work, I am doing hand springs.

查理·罗斯:洛克菲勒基金会曾因推动绿色革命而名声大噪,也为这项事业提供了支持。

Charlie Rose: The Rockefeller Foundation was famous for the Green Revolution and its support of that.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:是的。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes.

查理·罗斯:在农业领域,有没有类似的机会?

Charlie Rose: Are you, do you think that something like that in agriculture?

霍华德·G·巴菲特:我认为今天我要称之为“棕色革命”,我们——我们必须开始保护我们的自然资源,而土壤是关键。我的意思是,你不能——你知道,这就像你想开车去某个地方,就得给它加汽油或柴油。你必须——你必须得有土壤才能种出任何东西,而我们在认识到这一点上做得并不好。它并不性感,土壤并不性感,所以你知道人们不会去考虑它,但是——

Howard G. Buffett: I think today where I call it the Brown Revolution, we -- we've got to start protecting our natural resources and soil is the key. I mean you can't -- you know, it is like if you want to go somewhere in a car you have to put gasoline in it or diesel fuel. You've got to -- you just have to have soil to grow anything and we've not done a good job of recognizing it. It's not sexy, soil isn't sexy so you know people don't think about it but --

查理·罗斯:你和比尔·盖茨都觉得这事很酷。

Charlie Rose: You and Bill Gates thinks it's sexy.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:嗯,我——我给了比尔一本叫《泥土》的书,我说你读了就会明白为什么土壤更重要,但你知道——而且你知道,这——这确实是个挑战,因为这不是每个人都会去想的事,但我们——我们确实得更加关注我们如何对待自然资源,我们希望能像现在这样再种 100 年地,那就必须这么做。

Howard G. Buffett: Well I -- I gave Bill this book called "Dirt" I said read this and you will understand why soil is more important, but you know -- and you know, it's -- it's a challenge, because it's not what everybody thinks about but we -- we do have to pay more attention to how we're treating our natural resources and we want to be able to farm the way we farm in 100 years and then we've got to do it.

查理·罗斯:我想再提一次,因为她对你们三个人的塑造影响如此之深,我是说,你曾跟我提起苏茜,你知道,你曾经对我说过,你必须见见她,因为认识她之前,我是一团糟。

Charlie Rose: I want, one more time, because she was such a part of the shaping of the three of you, I mean you have said to me about Suzie, you know, that you once said to me you've got to meet her because I was a mess before I met her.

沃伦·巴菲特:没错,确实如此。

Warren Buffett: That's true, that is true.

查理·罗斯:这场对话是在她去世之前不久——而不是之后——发生的。这是她关于家族和价值观的思考。

Charlie Rose: This conversation took place not soon -- not later -- soon after this she passed away but here is her reflecting on the family and the values.

苏珊·汤普森·巴菲特:我认为,正是这一点让沃伦成了民主党人,这一点得归功于我。因为我们双方的父母都是共和党人,而我们不是。他会陪我去听演讲,比如杰西·杰克逊,还有写过《像我一样的黑人》的那位,以及刘易斯。他会陪我去,然后说——哦,我爱他,我爱他,所以不知不觉地,一步接一步,我一直在渗透。

Susan Thompson Buffett: I think that's what made Warren a Democrat I take the credit for that, because both our parents were Republicans and we are not. And he would go with me to hear speakers, you know, Jesse Jackson and the man who wrote "Black Like Me" and Lewis. And he would go with me, and say -- oh I loved him, loved him, so without knowing it, step-by-step, I was infiltrating.

查理·罗斯:是的。

Charlie Rose: Yes.

苏珊·汤普森·巴菲特:所以——他确实非常——我觉得这一点很深刻。有一天我跟他聊某个种族问题,他看着我说——查理,这大概是 40 年前的事了——他对我说,等着吧,等女人们发现自己是全世界的奴隶时。有多少男人意识到这一点,甚至女人呢?

Susan Thompson Buffett: And so -- and he is very much -- I find this a profound thing. I was talking to him one day about some racial issue and he looked at me and this, Charlie, would have been 40 years ago and he said to me, wait until women discover they're the slaves of the world. Now how many men are cognizant of that and even women?

查理·罗斯:哇,真是有先见之明,是吧?

Charlie Rose: Wow. Prophetic, huh?

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。

Warren Buffett: Yes.

霍华德·G·巴菲特:查理,我在写这本书之前看过那个采访。

Howard G. Buffett: Charlie I watched that interview before I wrote this book.

查理·罗斯:是的。这一点贯穿全书,不是吗?

Charlie Rose: Yes. It is throughout the book isn't it?

霍华德·G·巴菲特:是的。是的。

Howard G. Buffett: Yes. Yes.

沃伦·巴菲特:我要说明一下,她刚从喉癌中恢复过来,声音受了影响。

Warren Buffett: I should point out she is just recovering from throat cancer and it affected her voice.

查理·罗斯:那是 2004 年 6 月。我们来聊聊你现在看到的政治世界。我们刚刚经历了一场华盛顿的危机。

Charlie Rose: And this was June 2004. Let me talk about the world that you see now politically. We just went through a crisis in Washington.

沃伦·巴菲特:华盛顿制造了一场危机。

Warren Buffett: A Washington-created a crisis.

查理·罗斯:华盛顿方面提出了一些条件,要求对方先满足这些条件,才会支持提高债务上限和其他一些预算项目。你认为这会对全球形象产生什么影响——无论是对于那些持有美国国债的人,还是对于那些一直指望美国经济实力的人?

Charlie Rose: Washington-created and demanding things before they would support not only a rise in the debt ceiling but also some other budgetary items. What is this doing, do you think, to the image around the world and people who either hold treasuries or, b, have looked to America for economic strength?

沃伦·巴菲特:没错。我跟我的孩子们说过,书里应该也写了——建立声誉要花 20 年,毁掉它只要 20 分钟。而美国花了 237 年才建立起自己的声誉,这就是为什么我们成了世界储备货币,为什么人们信任我们的全部信誉和信用。国会如果威胁要毁掉这 237 年才建成的东西,那简直是——完全不负责任。债务上限这东西根本就不应该存在,我是说,限制债务的办法是别乱花钱——

Warren Buffett: Yes. Well, I told my children and I think it's in the book that, you know, it has been 20 years building a reputation, you destroy it in 20 minutes. Well the United States spent 237 years building a reputation and that's why we have become the world's reserve currency, and people trust our full faith and credit. And for a Congress to threaten to destroy what took 237 years to build is just -- it's totally irresponsible. The debt ceiling -- it shouldn't exist, I mean, the way to have a ceiling on your debt is not to spend more --

查理·罗斯:我理解的债务上限,就是围绕这个东西来谈判。

Charlie Rose: My idea of a debt ceiling is negotiating over this.

沃伦·巴菲特:不是。

Warren Buffett: It is not.

查理·罗斯:不是。

Charlie Rose: It's not.

沃伦·巴菲特:但一旦你拥有了它。

Warren Buffett: But once you have it.

查理·罗斯:是的。

Charlie Rose: Yes.

沃伦·巴菲特:如果你打算用它,它就不能被使用。我的意思是,我们拥有核武器,但我们不会使用它们,哪怕我们对别国感到失望。我们不会因为事情没按我们想要的方向发展就说要动用核武器。债务上限是一种政治上的大规模杀伤性武器,两党都应该说它不在考虑范围内。你知道,我们可以争论堕胎问题,可以争论移民问题,可以争论任何其他问题,但我们不会把这些和一种威胁捆绑在一起,这种威胁会毁掉美国 237 年来建立起来的声誉。所以,我会请求两党都明确表示,这种武器不在考虑范围之内。

Warren Buffett: If you're going to have it, it can't be used. I mean we have nuclear weapons but we're not going to use them, even if we get disappointed with other say. We don't say because this isn't happening not the way we want we are going to use a nuclear weapon. The debt ceiling is a political weapon of mass destruction and both parties should say it is off the table, you know. You know we can argue about abortion we can argue about immigration, we can argue about those things whatever it may be but we're not going to tie that to a threat to destroy a reputation that the United States has built up over 237 years. So I would ask both political parties to say it is off the table.

查理·罗斯:你觉得经过这次险境,他们会不会更有可能听进去?

Charlie Rose: Do you think it's more likely that they will be listening because of the close call we had here?

沃伦·巴菲特:我想也许吧。你知道,我——我一直对人类抱有希望。实际上,参议员麦康奈尔,虽然我在很多问题上和他看法不同,但他过去——据我所知,他提出过至少——能降低债务上限被当作武器使用的可能性。这个东西应该彻底废除,但如果从政治角度来说我们只能做到这一步,那就祝他成功吧。

Warren Buffett: I think maybe. You know, I -- I always have hope in humans and actually, Senator McConnell, who I don't agree with on many things, but he has -- he has introduced in the past, I believe, something that at least -- it will reduce the chance that the debt ceiling will be used as a weapon. And it should be eliminated entirely but if that's the best we can do politically you know more power to him.

查理·罗斯:违约本是大规模杀伤性武器。

Charlie Rose: Default would have been the weapon of mass destruction.

沃伦·巴菲特:那纯粹是犯傻,你知道,就好比——好比有人用毒气什么的,我是说,就因为自己没得手就乱来。这东西不能当成武器使。

Warren Buffett: It just would have been plain stupid, it would you know, it would be -- it would be like using poison gas or something, I mean just because you weren't getting your own way. It is not something to be used as a weapon.

查理·罗斯:好。那么现在有民主党人和共和党人,还有一个委员会,由帕蒂·默里和保罗·瑞安牵头。

Charlie Rose: Ok. So now you have Democrats and Republicans and you have a commission, Patty Murray and Paul Ryan.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的,没错。

Warren Buffett: Yes right.

查理·罗斯:他们算是主持这个委员会吧。

Charlie Rose: Are sort of chairing it.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。

Warren Buffett: Yes.

查理·罗斯:而且他们有——

Charlie Rose: And they have --

沃伦·巴菲特:我认为他们都是不错的人。

Warren Buffett: And I think they are good people.

查理·罗斯:他们还有时间——而且他们对预算有所了解,因为他们是各自委员会的主席。现在你们的期限是到 12 月 13 日,他们应不应该把辛普森-鲍尔斯方案作为起点?

Charlie Rose: And they've got until -- and they know something about budgeting, because they are chairmen of their respective committees. You now have until December 13th, should they use Simpson-Bowles as a starting point?

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,我觉得他们可以用那个方案,或者类似的东西。我的意思是——他们的目标应该是尽量多做成一些事情。

Warren Buffett: Well, I think they can use that or something like it. I mean -- I mean their goal ought to be to get a lot done.

查理·罗斯:好,那他们该努力做成什么事?你帮我——也帮他们——理解一下,巴菲特式的建议会是什么。

Charlie Rose: Ok and so what should they try to get done? Help me understand -- help them understand what a Buffett recommendation would be.

沃伦·巴菲特:他们不可能让全部 535 名议员都同意,但他们应该尽可能在不会损害经济的领域增加收入,而且——我认为在福利政策的某些方面,如果他们要对我领取的社保金进行收入审查,我完全赞成。

Warren Buffett: Well they are not going to get 535 people on board but they should do as much as they can toward both raising revenues where it won't hurt the economy and -- and I think looking at certain aspects of entitlement, if they want a means test of my Social Security I am all for it.

查理·罗斯:还要设定一个年龄门槛吗?

Charlie Rose: And a certain age too?

沃伦·巴菲特:是的,大概如此。你不能只看一项计划的一部分,而不看整个计划。

Warren Buffett: Yes probably. You can't look at one part of a program without looking at the whole program.

查理·罗斯:没错。

Charlie Rose: Right.

沃伦·巴菲特:但是——但如果他们拿出一个我八成赞同的方案,我会为他们加油。我是说,没人会百分百同意。那是他们的工作。我的意思是,不管他们在这段时间内能不能搞定,也许过去发生的事会以某种方式帮助他们完成。但国会的工作,你知道,不是搞什么债务上限、让政府停摆、干那些事。政府的工作——

Warren Buffett: But -- but if they come up with a program that I am 80 percent in agreement with I will cheer them on. I mean nobody is going to be 100 percent in agreement. And that's their job. I mean whether within this time frame they can get it or maybe that will help get them done what's happened up somehow. But the job of the Congress, you know, is not to be putting up debt ceilings and shutting down governments and doing things like that. The job of the government --

查理·罗斯:他们现在必须拿出预算方案,而且必须做到,才能避免再次出现之前那种债务上限危机。

Charlie Rose: They've got to find a budget now and they have to do that so that they don't have the debt ceiling crisis they had before.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的,但——如果我是帕蒂·默里和保罗·瑞安,我第一件要做的事就是,代表我们各自的政党说,我们呼吁将债务上限从未来所有讨论中彻底移除,不再与任何其他事情挂钩。我会说,我们俩过去都说过,我不会搞这种相互指责的事,或任何类似的事情。过去谁用过这个工具根本不重要——它是个不合适的工具。

Warren Buffett: Yes but they -- the first thing I would do if I were Patty Murray and Ryan -- Paul Ryan is, I would say, on behalf of our respective parties, you know, we are calling for absolutely taking the debt ceiling out of any future discussions, that tie up with anything else and I would say, we both said in the past, I would not get into this finger pointing stuff or anything of the sort. It doesn't make any difference who used it in the past, it is an inappropriate instrument to use.

查理·罗斯:而且——你会对民主党人说,我们必须改革福利制度。

Charlie Rose: And -- and you would say to Democrats we have to reform entitlements.

沃伦·巴菲特:理应如此。

Warren Buffett: We should.

查理·罗斯:因为一两天前你在《华尔街日报》上看到一篇文章,说的就是自由派和民主党扬言不能动福利制度,而共和党则说只要你们还持这两方立场,就别谈减税。

Charlie Rose: Because there is an article you saw in the "Wall Street Journal" a day or two ago saying, you know the liberal and Democratic Party saying no messing around with entitlements. The Republicans are saying don't cut taxes as long as you have those two positions.

沃伦·巴菲特:到现在为止,采取那种办法确实效果很不错。不过我要说的是,如果能这么做的话——如果我是默里和瑞安,我会试着私下推动,然后拿出一个一揽子方案来。因为我觉得,如果一项一项地来,没人愿意在单项条款上退让。人们过不了几个月就要面对初选,这会让他们忧心忡忡,在这种情况下展开公开辩论是个极大的难题。所以我会尝试拿出一个接近一揽子方案的东西,每个人只是勉强满意,但总体上我们都认为对国家有利。

Warren Buffett: It certainly has worked wonderfully so far taking that approach. Now I would say this, to the extent it can be done if I were -- if I were Murray and Ryan, I would try to do in this in private and come out with something of a package, because I think if you take it one by one, nobody wants to give on the individual points. So it is an enormous problem to have a debate in public when people are facing primaries in not that many months and that's what they are worried about. So I would try to come out with something close to a package that everybody just liked a little bit but overall we felt was good for the country.

查理·罗斯:那么,哪部分你不喜欢,却愿意在方案中看到?

Charlie Rose: So what is it you dislike that you would be willing to see in the package?

沃伦·巴菲特:哦,我——我认为——我认为我们得在福利制度上做出某些决断,还得在税收上做出某些决断。但你知道,你没法脱离整个方案来谈其中某一块,这也是为什么我希望他们能拿出全盘方案。

Warren Buffett: Oh, I -- I think that -- I think we have to make certain judgments about entitlements. I think we have to make certain judgments about taxes but how it's -- you know it's -- you can't really talk about one part of the package without looking at the whole package, that's why I would like them to come out with the whole thing.

查理·罗斯:好,那我也这样来理解一下。我是说,你谈到我们需要增加收入时,我们显然确实需要。

Charlie Rose: Well let me just understand this too. I mean when you talk about we need to increase revenue, obviously, we do.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。

Warren Buffett: Yes.

查理·罗斯:你的意思不仅仅是减少抵扣,还要提高税率?

Charlie Rose: You mean more than simply reducing deductions, you mean increasing rates?

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。财政收入得提高到 GDP 的 18.5% 左右。

Warren Buffett: Yes now the revenue has to go up to 18.5 percent or so of GDP.

查理·罗斯:没错。支出——应该维持在 GDP 的 18.5%。

Charlie Rose: Yes. Expenses -- that is a place it ought to be 18.5 percent of the GDP.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的,支出应该占 20.5% 或 21%,我们可以承受 2.5 个百分点的缺口,只要 GDP 不下降、债务占 GDP 比重不上升,这完全没问题。我就是在这样的世界中运作的,你知道,从二战结束以来,一直行得通。但这并不是——并不是不可能。我们比以往任何时候都富裕,我们绝对是——你看,人均 GDP 5 万美元,我们比 30 年、40 年或 50 年前我工作的时候富裕太多了。所以问题不是国家变穷了,问题是我们做出了过度承诺,而且在某些情况下,我们不愿意增加收入来兑现那些很可能应当做出的承诺。

Warren Buffett: Yes expenses should be 20.5 or 21, we can take two -- 2.5 percent gap without GDP going up, without the debt going up as a percentage of GDP, there is nothing wrong with that. I have operated in a world like that, you know, since I was -- since World War II ended, it works. But it's not -- it's not impossible. We are richer than we've ever been, we're absolute -- you know, $50,000 of GDP per person, I mean, we are way richer than when I was working 30 or 40 or 50 years ago. So the problem isn't that the country has become poor, the problem is that we have over promised and we are unwilling in some cases to raise the revenues to meet some of the promises that we probably should have.

查理·罗斯:5 万美元,意味着当我们按人均来比较——

Charlie Rose: $50,000 means when we compare our per individual --

沃伦·巴菲特:是我出生时的六倍了。

Warren Buffett: It's six times what it was when I was born.

查理·罗斯:美国人均大约是 5 万美元,而中国呢,大概是 7,000 或 8,000 美元。

Charlie Rose: And it's $50,000 thereabouts and in China it's what 7,000 or 8,000.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。以前差不多就是这样。

Warren Buffett: Yes. I think it was.

查理·罗斯:也许甚至到 4000 或 5000。

Charlie Rose: Maybe even 4,000 or 5,000.

沃伦·巴菲特:我们是地球上最富有的家族。想象一下,1930 年我父亲在候诊室的时候,有人跟他说,你儿子将来能活到——当时的人均收入是今天的六分之一。我父亲肯定会觉得那简直是乌托邦。我的意思是,我们在学会如何生产东西、如何处理生产出来的东西方面所取得的成就,简直不可思议。其实,我们也算是开化了一点。

Warren Buffett: We are the richest family on earth. Imagine when my dad was in the waiting room in 1930 and somebody said that your son is going to live -- when the average is six times per capita what it is today. My dad would have thought it would be utopia. I mean it is unbelievable what we have achieved in terms of learning how to turn out stuff, in terms of how we handle the stuff that we turn out. I mean we are enlightened a little bit.

查理·罗斯:我得说,你儿子的收入和财富将超过一些——甚至不少国家。

Charlie Rose: Now I have to say that your son will have an income and a wealth larger than some -- a number of countries too.

沃伦·巴菲特:噢,事情会——这个国家前途光明,查理。顺便说一句,535 个人搞不垮它。他们有时候看起来像是在使劲折腾,但办不到。他们拦不住 3.15 亿美国人。我是说美国这架机器在运转,不过最近这几个月确实卡了壳。

Warren Buffett: Oh, things will -- this country has a wonderful future, Charlie and incidentally, 535 people can't screw it up. They may look like they're trying sometimes but they can't. They can't stop 315 million Americans. I mean America works, but it has certainly gotten gummed up in recent months.

查理·罗斯:但中国和那些持有美债的人,还有别的地方可去吗?

Charlie Rose: But do the Chinese and people who own treasuries have somewhere else to go?

沃伦·巴菲特:不会。美国会按时还债的,美国的全部信用和信赖——依然完好无损。我想——我觉得足够多的人已经从上一次走到悬崖边这事里学到了教训,我们会——这种事就该完全被排除掉。为什么要为不会发生的事担忧?为什么要让几百万人为一件 535 个议员都知道很疯狂、不会发生的事而焦虑?那完全没道理。要是我在这个节目上说一件我知道不会发生的事,结果让几千万人跟着担心,那就是不负责任。

Warren Buffett: No, no. And America will pay its bills, I mean the full faith and credit of -- is still intact in the United States. I mean I think -- I think enough people have learned something from going up to the brink that we are going to -- it should just be ruled out entirely. Why worry about something that isn't going to happen? Why cause millions of people to worry about something that 535 know would be crazy and it won't happen? That doesn't make any sense. If I would say something on this show that I know isn't going to happen, and then cause worry for tens of millions of people that is irresponsible.

查理·罗斯:当时的想法是,比如在预算中他们能削减医保资金——也就是奥巴马医改。

Charlie Rose: And the idea was that they're going to be able to defund Medicare, for example in the budget -- Obamacare.

沃伦·巴菲特:他们可以说他们想在奥马哈建个新邮局,你知道,但我不会投票支持这事儿。这简直——简直疯了。

Warren Buffett: They can say they want a new post office, you know, in Omaha and I'm not going to vote for this thing. It is just -- it's crazy.

查理·罗斯:但还有一种观点,请你跟我说——你是怎么看的,因为有一些赤字鹰派在谈论这个国家面临的长期债务问题,而拉里·萨默斯和其他人则认为,你知道,我们需要做的是专注于增长,我们取得的增长将能让我们偿还债务,因为这不是当务之急,当务之急是增长。你同意拉里·萨默斯的看法吗?

Charlie Rose: But there is also this argument and tell me where -- how you see it because we have deficit hawks who talk about long-term debt that this country faces, and you have Larry Summers and others who are arguing that, you know, what we need to do is focus on growth and that the growth we will have will enable us to pay off the debt because that is not an immediate need and the immediate need is growth. Do you agree with Larry Summers on that?

沃伦·巴菲特:我们正在增长,而且会继续增长。

Warren Buffett: We are having growth and we are going to continue to have growth.

查理·罗斯:但我们需要增长来应对挑战。

Charlie Rose: But we need growth to meet the challenge of being

沃伦·巴菲特:但我们不应该让债务增速长期超过经济增长速度。我是说,现有的债务规模我们能够承受,相对于当前产出来说,我们扛得住。可要是债务增长持续快于产出增长,迟早会出问题。

Warren Buffett: But we should not increase our debt over time at a rate that's faster than our growth. I mean we can handle the debt we have. We can handle the debt we have relative to our current output. But we can't keep getting debt grow at a rate that is faster than output, eventually that catches up with you.

查理·罗斯:债务与 GDP 的比率多少才算合适?

Charlie Rose: What is an appropriate rate of debt to GDP?

沃伦·巴菲特:没人确切知道。但毫无疑问——

Warren Buffett: Nobody knows exactly. But certainly --

查理·罗斯:你怎么看?

Charlie Rose: What do you think?

沃伦·巴菲特:——但我们的净债务,人们总说接近 17 万亿美元,其实我们的净债务——去掉 4 万亿美元之后,净债务占 GDP 大约 70% 多。二战结束时,我记得差不多是 120%——这个数字可能有点出入。没人知道那个神奇的上限是多少,但你不会把它们逼到极限。我是说,你懂的。如果我们净债务与 GDP 的比率维持在 72% 或者什么水平,那完全没问题,你知道,从 120% 起步,没几年前就降到了 30% 多,但我们目前挺好。不过,这个趋势不该继续下去。

Warren Buffett: -- but our net debt, people talk about close to $17 trillion but our net debt is -- knock $4 trillion off that. Our net debt is 70 odd percent of GDP. We came out of World War II with I think close to 120 percent -- I may be off a little bit on that. So nobody knows the magic level but you don't press them to the ultimate. I mean, you know. And if we stay at 72 percent or whatever it may be, of net debt to GDP that is perfectly ok, you know, it got down into the thirties not that many years ago starting from that 120 but we are fine. But it is a trend that should not continue.

查理·罗斯:你对自动减支怎么看?

Charlie Rose: How do you feel about sequestration?

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,这又说到,你知道,又说到人们玩的那种把戏了。我只希望他们能关注这个国家需要什么,能为这 3.15 亿人做什么。他们不可能意见全都一致,你知道的。如果拿出一份预算,你喜欢其中 80%,我也喜欢 80%——虽然喜欢的 80% 不会完全一样,但我们都会觉得还行。我是说,这比看着他们过去几个月玩的那种把戏要舒服多了。

Warren Buffett: Well, again, that gets into the, you know, sort of gets into the games that people play. I would just like them to focus on what this country needs, what they can do for the 315 million people. They are not all going to agree, you know. If they get a budget and you like 80 percent of it, I like 80 percent of it -- it won't be exactly the same 80 percent but we will feel ok. I mean we'll feel a lot better than having them play the games they have been playing the last few months.

查理·罗斯:但你有没有一种感觉——我记得你说是这么认为的——很可能因为米奇·麦康奈尔说过的话,以及其他人也站出来说我们不能再让这种事发生,我们不能再把问题往后拖了。

Charlie Rose: But do you have a sense -- and I think you said yes -- that there may very well because of what Mitch McConnell has said and that others have stepped forward to say we cannot let this happen again. We just can't kick the can down the road.

沃伦·巴菲特:应该取消这一条。我们在 1945 年用过两次原子弹。从那以后,我们经历过各种事情。苏联人也经历过各种让他们极为恼火、很想大力改变的事情。但他们没有扔核弹,而这条规则是一种金融领域的核武器。它根本不该出现在任何一个党派的工具箱里。

Warren Buffett: It should be taken off. We used the atomic bomb twice in 1945. We faced all kinds of things since then. The Soviets have faced all kinds of things that really irritated them and they wanted to change in a big way. They did not drop nuclear bombs and this is a nuclear weapon of a financial sort. And it just does not belong in the repertoire of either party.

查理·罗斯:您认为我们是否从 2008 年那场崩盘中汲取了教训?

Charlie Rose: Do you believe we learned the lessons that caused the crash in 2008?

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,我们学到了泡沫一定会发生,而当住房市场出现泡沫时,它可能是一个非常大的泡沫。我们——人们在某些方面可能会变得更聪明。但说到恐惧和贪婪,我认为未来几百年也不会改变。再往后的事我就不管了。

Warren Buffett: Well, we learned that bubbles will happen and when you get one in housing it can be a very big bubble. We -- people may get smarter in some respects. When it comes to fear and greed, I don't think they will change in the next few centuries, anyway. I will let you carry it out beyond that.

查理·罗斯:有趣的是,就在刚才,今年的诺贝尔经济学奖颁发了,其中一位得主法玛,你知道,他相信市场是有序的,而且它们是——

Charlie Rose: But interesting we just had a Nobel Prize in economic award and one man Fama, you know, believes that the markets can be ordered and that they are --

沃伦·巴菲特:它们是高效的。

Warren Buffett: They are efficient.

查理·罗斯:它们是有效的。另一个——希勒说,不,它们是非理性的,我们还会经历更多泡沫。

Charlie Rose: They ar efficient. The other -- Shiller says, no, they are irrational and we will have more bubbles.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。

Warren Buffett: Yes.

查理·罗斯:你怎么看?

Charlie Rose: Where do you come down?

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,市场总体上相当有效,但并非完全有效,我想帕尔默教授大概也会这么说。

Warren Buffett: Well, the markets are generally quite efficient but they are not efficient and I think probably Professor Palmer would say that.

查理·罗斯:是的。

Charlie Rose: Yes.

沃伦·巴菲特:席勒说得对,未来我们还会经历更多泡沫。

Warren Buffett: Shiller is right that we will have more bubbles.

查理·罗斯:是的。

Charlie Rose: Yes.

沃伦·巴菲特:这次的危机尤其极端,因为它涉及的是全国最大的资产类别——住房,几乎人人都有份。而且,很多情况下杠杆加到了极限;人们把自己房子再融资等等搞了个遍。所以,你面对的是一个巨大的资产类别,保证金押到了顶。当这个资产类别的价格下跌时,就会冲击数千万人,以及世界各地靠着各种抵押品放贷的金融机构。这次危机从一开始就被设计成一场巨大的、巨大的崩盘,我们也确实等来了。

Warren Buffett: This was a particularly extreme one because it involved the biggest asset class in the country that almost everybody had -- housing. And it also was leveraged to the hilt in many cases; people have refinanced their houses and everything. So you had a huge asset class, margined to the hilt. And when that asset class fell in price, I mean it hit tens of millions of people and financial institutions all over the world that lent based on everything. It was designed to be a huge, huge crash and we got it.

查理·罗斯:那您觉得我们吸取教训了吗?

Charlie Rose: And do you think we have learned a lesson?

沃伦·巴菲特:那种泡沫的教训我们吸取了,我是说,你懂的。

Warren Buffett: We have learned a lesson about that kind of bubble, I mean, you know.

查理·罗斯:那《多德-弗兰克法案》下次能帮到我们吗?

Charlie Rose: And wil Dodd-Frank help us next time?

沃伦·巴菲特:不好说。

Warren Buffett: I am not sure.

查理·罗斯:您是不认为他们在《多德-弗兰克法案》上完成了该做的事——建立起一套既能预警、又能防止人们最初闯祸的那种行为的监管架构?

Charlie Rose: You don't think they have done the job that was necessary with Dodd-Frank -- -- to creating a regulatory structure that may be both a warning and preventing people from doing the kind of behavior that got them in trouble in the first place?

沃伦·巴菲特:恐惧和贪婪太难管住了,你知道。

Warren Buffett: Fear and greed are pretty hard to control, you know.

查理·罗斯:恐惧和贪婪胜过了监管。

Charlie Rose: Fear and greed triumphs over regulation.

沃伦·巴菲特:1929 年之后,你知道,我们花了两三年时间——我们设立了联邦通信委员会(FCC),有了存款保险,做了所有这些事,对照 1929 年来看,然后呢,我们又迎来了 2008 年。我不觉得人类什么时候能变得不会时不时爆发出集体恐慌。

Warren Buffett: After 1929, you know, we spent two or three years -- we had the FCC. We had the deposit insurance and did al; of these things, looking at 1929 and, you know, we got 2008. I don't think humans will ever behave in a way where you don't get mass fear from time to time.

查理·罗斯:有意思的是,蒂姆·盖特纳最近在几次演讲和私下谈话里说——当年伯南克、保尔森和我——要是没有国会授予的紧急权力,我们根本干不成那些事。可现在争论里有人想把这权力收回去。

Charlie Rose: One interesting thing is that Tim Geithner is now having some speeches and private conversations who said we could not have done what we did -- Bernanke, Paulson, and me -- without the emergency powers that were given to use by the Congress. And then some people in the present debate want to stop that kind of power.

沃伦·巴菲特:说到多德-弗兰克法案,我把那 20 页——不管多少页——都读完了。但伯南克动用了所谓的 13-3 条款,有位美联储主席——我不说是哪一位——曾经告诉我,他说根据 13-3 条款,他们什么都能干。而事实是,当时我们几乎什么都得干。汉克·保尔森有个叫——叫什么来着——紧急稳定基金的东西。那是 1943 年调整黄金价格时设立的。他拿那个去担保货币市场基金。从没人想过那东西是干这个用的,但他们就是做了,你知道吧。谁敢拦他们?我不知道紧急稳定基金是否允许这么干,但当时有那帮人,他们手里有那些权力,而且我认为,可能我这点说得不对,多德-弗兰克法案在一定程度上限制了美联储和财政部的一些能力——相信我,那些能力在上次危机中可是至关重要的。

Warren Buffett: If you look at Dodd-Frank, I have read all 20 -- however many pages there are, but Bernanke used something called Section 13-3, I had a Federal Reserve chairman I won't tell you which one who told me once he said under 13-3 we can do anything. And the truth is we had to do almost anything. And Hank Paulson had something called -- what was it -- emergency stabilization fund. It was set up when they changed the price of gold back in 1943. That is the thing he used to guarantee money market fund. Nobody ever thought it was designed for that but they did it, you know. And who was going to stop them? I don't know whether the emergency stabilization fund allows that, but you had men there who would act and who had these authorities and to some extent, I believe, I may be wrong on this, that Dodd-Frank circumscribed some of those abilities that the fed and the treasury had and believe me they were important last time.

查理·罗斯:他们也可以这么说。还有一件事,摩根大通涉及 130 亿美元的和解案。您怎么看?这个金额合适吗?正当吗?它能起到警示作用吗?

Charlie Rose: And they could -- they say so. There is also this, JPMorgan and a $13 billion settlement. What do you think of that? Was that appropriate? Was it the right amount? Will it serve to send a signal?

沃伦·巴菲特:我不知道多少钱才算合适,但我知道一点。当检察官盯上一家金融机构——记得在所罗门的时候,我们被罚了 2.9 亿美元。我当时根本没有谈判筹码。相信我,如果他们对我们提起刑事诉讼,第二天我们就得关门,那会带来一连串严重后果。所以你其实没得选——基本等于你把喉咙亮给狼咬,要是你处在那种局面的话。我也不知道罚款数字是怎么算出来的。但我确实知道,依我看,因为贝尔斯登或华盛顿互惠银行的事去罚摩根大通,是个天大的错误。我的意思是,也许杰米·戴蒙在贝尔斯登上没拿到赔偿保证,但他是在政府希望有人挺身而出的时候站出来的,处理华盛顿互惠银行时也一样。

Warren Buffett: I don't know what the right amount is but I know this. When a prosecutor tells you that a financial institution -- it was I think we got fined $290 million when I was at Solomon. I had now negotiating power. Believe me, if they brought a criminal action against us we were out of business the next day and that would have had a lot of consequences. So you really have no -- you're like a wolf baring your throat, basically, if you are dealing in that kind of a situation. And I don't know where the numbers come from. I do know that in my own view, punishing JPMorgan for anything that happened in connection with Bear Stearns or WAMU I think is a terrible mistake. I mean maybe Jamie didn't get an indemnification agreement on Bear Stearns, but he was stepping forward at a time that the government wanted him to step forward and same way with

查理·罗斯:您觉得这不公平?

Charlie Rose: You think it is unfair?

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。如果这和那些事有关,我认为这不公平。是的,我确实这么觉得。

Warren Buffett: Yes. I think if it relates to any of that, I think it is unfair. Yes, I really do.

查理·罗斯:我觉得他们会说问题远不止那些。

Charlie Rose: I think they will argue there was more than that.

沃伦·巴菲特:可能是不止那些,但他们提到——我觉得他们是把贝尔斯登和华盛顿互惠银行的罪过也算进来凑数了。而且我认为政府里没人希望摩根大通从贝尔斯登或华盛顿互惠银行的事里撒手不管。我认为他们本来可以——他们本来可以拿到一份赔偿保证协议,如果他们想的话,你知道,拿着整个经济去冒险,拖着谈判往下走。但,你知道,他们被要求以极快的速度行动,他们照做了,现在也许正在为此受罚。我想,我这么说吧,我觉得整个体系变得更好了,因为杰米·戴蒙从 2008 年起一路掌舵摩根大通走到今天。

Warren Buffett: Well there was more than that probably but they have referenced, I think they have referenced the sins of Bear Stearns and WAMU in coming up with the number. And I don't think anybody in government was hoping that JPMorgan was going to walk away from Bear Stearns or WAMU. And I think they could have -- they probably could have gotten an indemnification agreement if they wanted to, you know, take risks with the whole economy in terms of keeping the negotiations going. But, you know, they were asked to act in a very, very quick manner and they did and maybe they are getting punished for it now. I think, I will put it this way I think the system is better off because Jamie Dimon has been running JPMorgan straight through from 2008.

查理·罗斯:你这么说,理由是什么?

Charlie Rose: You say that because?

沃伦·巴菲特:我觉得他一直都是领军人物。

Warren Buffett: I think the guy has been a leader.

查理·罗斯:是因为他做过的那些决策吗?

Charlie Rose: Because of the decisions he has made?

沃伦·巴菲特:对。

Warren Buffett: Yes.

查理·罗斯:在把这家银行打造成美国最大银行的过程中?

Charlie Rose: In building the biggest bank in America?

沃伦·巴菲特:对,贝尔斯登要垮的时候,他在;华盛顿互惠银行要倒的时候,他也在。那些决策之所以重要,不只是因为关系到那几家机构本身,更因为它们向全世界传递了一个信号:有人在站出来担当。

Warren Buffett: Yes when Bear Stearns was going down he was there. And when WAMU was going down he was there. And those were important decisions not just in terms of those institutions but what they said to the rest of the world that somebody is stepping up.

查理·罗斯:这笔钱——130 亿美元——由谁来出?

Charlie Rose: Who pays for this -- $13 billion?

沃伦·巴菲特:这个嘛,股东会为此买单。而且,出钱的甚至都不是当年的那批股东了。这就是它的运作本质。

Warren Buffett: Well, the shareholders will pay for it. And of course, they're not even the shareholders who were around in the past. That's the nature of it.

查理·罗斯:而如果说摩根大通如今是这样——你持有的另外两家银行,美国银行和富国银行,可能也面临风险。

Charlie Rose: And if JPMorgan is today -- two other banks you have an investment in -- Bank of America and Wells Fargo might also be at risk.

沃伦·巴菲特:这个嘛,它们已经签下巨额支票了,你知道的。实情是,如果监管机构找上你,而你在所有这些州都持有牌照,也许(听不清),你就得照他们说的去做。你懂的,你可以把你最有力的论据都摆出来,但最终还是得照办。

Warren Buffett: Well, they have written big checks already, you know. The truth is if a regulator comes around you and you hold licenses in all of these states and maybe (inaudible), you do what they say. You know, you put up the best argument you have but you do what they say.

查理·罗斯:根据我们读到的信息,杰米非常希望他们也能一并放弃追究刑事责任,但他们拒绝了,所以刑事追责的可能性依然悬在那里。

Charlie Rose: Well, according to what we have read, Jamie very much wanted them to also forego the criminal possibilities and they refused to do that so the criminal possibility is still out there.

沃伦·巴菲特:确实还悬着——我不觉得真会走到那一步,不过——

Warren Buffett: Still is out there -- I don't think it will happen but --

查理·罗斯:可是——哪怕他们只是觉得这事可能发生,

Charlie Rose: But -- if they even think it's going to happen

沃伦·巴菲特:我可不喜欢在一项刑事诉讼的威胁下经营一家金融机构,不过我这个人是经历过这种事。

Warren Buffett: I would not like running a financial institution with a threat of a criminal action against it but I did at one time.

查理·罗斯:所罗门兄弟。

Charlie Rose: The Solomon brothers.

沃伦·巴菲特:我当时确实是身在其中。每天醒来都会担心,资金的生命线会不会被突然拔掉。

Warren Buffett: I did it. And every day you wake up wondering whether the plug will be pulled.

查理·罗斯:你看到他们做的事,再考虑未来,摩根大通有能力消化得了。

Charlie Rose: When you look at what they did and in terms of the future, JPMorgan can absorb this.

沃伦·巴菲特:他们能承受 130 亿美元。这正是他们被要求缴纳这个数额的原因。如果同样的事情发生在一家连 130 亿美元都承担不起的公司——

Warren Buffett: They can absorb $13 billion. That's why they got asked for it. If the exact same actions had happened at a place that couldn't have afforded $13 billion, even --

查理·罗斯:他们不会那么做。

Charlie Rose: They wouldn't do that.

沃伦·巴菲特:不,不。

Warren Buffett: No, no.

查理·罗斯:你觉得“大而不倒”现在还存在吗?它应不应该存在?

Charlie Rose: Do you think too big to fail is still with us? And should be with us?

沃伦·巴菲特:我认为——是的,我认为——但大到不能倒的惩罚方式不对——那些积极参与其中的人最后腰缠万贯走了,你懂的。买单的是那些机构的股东,我是说 AIG 的股东付出了代价。他们跟 AIG 金融产品的那些行为没有任何关系。但人们说,持有这些股票的人损失占了他们净资产的很大比例。我认为,如果你经营一家大型金融机构,而且你需要政府的帮助,那你和你的配偶就应该一无所有地离开。我是说,在这类事情里,各式各样其他的人最后都破产了。

Warren Buffett: I think -- yes, I think -- but too big to be punished -- the people that were active participants and walked away rich, you know. It is the shareholders of those institutions that pay, I mean the shareholders of AIG paid. They didn't have anything to do with the actions of AIG financial products. But people said the loss was a very significant percentage of their net worth that owned the stock. I think that if you run a major financial institution and you need the help of the government you and your spouse should go away broke. I mean all kinds of other people end up getting broke in these things.

查理·罗斯:可结果并非如此。

Charlie Rose: That is not what happened.

沃伦·巴菲特:不,情况并非如此。

Warren Buffett: No, that is not what happened.

查理·罗斯:那你怎么纠正?

Charlie Rose: How would you correct that?

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,也许—— 让我写—— 如果你给我点时间,我能写出一部法规来。

Warren Buffett: Well, maybe -- Let me write -- I can write a statute if you gave may little time.

查理·罗斯:那会写些什么?

Charlie Rose: What would it say?

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,这个说法嘛,得让比我更懂行的人来起草才行。但本质上,我不会允许任何庞大到危及美国经济运转、以至于必须靠政府出手拯救的金融机构存在。我会确保导致这种局面的 CEO 及其配偶净身出户、一文不名,而董事们至少得退还过去五年左右赚到的全部报酬。如果这样的制度存在,我想大家会更留心——你知道,你可以说某个身家 5 亿美元、持有 1 亿美元股票的家伙会受到什么惩罚,但那根本不现实。真正买单的是股东,是社会。所以,要想改变人类行为,就得改变对关键决策者本人的惩罚力度。

Warren Buffett: Well, it would say that, it would have to be more drafted by somebody who knows more about that than I do but essentially I would not let any huge financial institution so important to the functioning of the United States that they had to go to the government and get saved. I would make sure that the CEO that led to that and the spouse walked away broke and I would say that the directors should at least have to refund everything they have earned in the previous five years or so. If that were there I think you would have more attention going into -- you know, you can say the downside to some guy that's got $500 million and 100 million of the stock but that isn't -- you know, that is not real. It is the shareholders that pay for it and society that pays for it so, if you want to change human behavior, I think you change the penalty that happens to the humans whose behavior counts in that situation.

查理·罗斯:对,但我的意思是,你说的这些人的做法造成了经济损失,他们应该破产,他们不应该从那些毁掉他人生活和财富的决策中获利,这是你的意思吗?

Charlie Rose: Yes, but I mean you are talking about financial losses to these people and they should go broke and they shouldn't profit from the decisions they made that ruined the lives and fortunes of a lot of other people is what you are saying?

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。

Warren Buffett: Yes.

查理·罗斯:他们应该去坐牢吗?

Charlie Rose: Should they go to prison?

沃伦·巴菲特:那得看他们做了什么,但我不排除这种可能。

Warren Buffett: That depends on what they did but I don't rule it out.

查理·罗斯:你觉得有些人做了确实该进监狱的事吗?这些事你比大多数人更清楚吧?

Charlie Rose: Do you think some did things that justified going to prison? You know more about this than most people?

沃伦·巴菲特:有。这很难说,查理,我不知道答案,但对我来说并非不可想象,不过我还是不知道答案。

Warren Buffett: Yes. That is hard to say, Charlie, I don't know the answer to that, but it is not inconceivable to me but I don't know the answer to that.

查理·罗斯:巴菲特规则就摆在那里。

Charlie Rose: The Buffett rule is there.

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,我的助理叫黛比·博萨内克——所以在我们办公室,这叫博萨内克规则。

Warren Buffett: Well, m assistant is called Debbie Bosanek -- so it's the Bosanek rule around the office.

查理·罗斯:我认识她,也特别喜欢她。

Charlie Rose: And I know and love her.

沃伦·巴菲特:应该的。

Warren Buffett: As you should.

查理·罗斯:但还有一点。我觉得有意思的是,这个话题在对话中已经出现了——不管关乎人生,还是关乎财务行为。你不想正好踩在边界线上——你想在场地中央活动。

Charlie Rose: And there is also this though. I mean what is interesting an this has come up in this conversation and it is about a life or it's about financial doings. You don't want to go right where the line is -- you want to play in the middle of the field.

沃伦·巴菲特:没错。

Warren Buffett: Sure.

查理·罗斯:你不想做那些一旦登上《纽约时报》头版就会毁掉你人生的事。

Charlie Rose: And you don't want to do things that if they ended up on the front pages of "New York Times" your life would be ruined.

沃伦·巴菲特:完全同意。

Warren Buffett: Absolutely.

查理·罗斯:就像你说的,你可以花二十年建立声誉,也能一瞬之间把它毁掉。

Charlie Rose: As you say you can build a reputation for 20 years and you can destroy it in one moment.

沃伦·巴菲特:是的。美国最近就差点把自己声誉毁了。

Warren Buffett: Yes. And the United States almost did that here recently.

查理·罗斯:但你对这个国家仍持乐观态度,因为创新,因为资源,主要还是因为人力资本。

Charlie Rose: But you are optimistic about the country because of the innovation, because of the resources, mainly because of the human capital.

沃伦·巴菲特:看看过去这 237 年就行了,在任何时候做空美国,有什么好处?237 年,你知道,人们会说,你在赌美国赢。可是,谁会想去赌它输呢?看看历史记录就知道了,而且我们还远未挖掘出人的潜能。这个国家最好的日子还在前头。

Warren Buffett: Just look at the last 237 years, I mean what does it pay to bet against America over any time? 237 years, you know, people say well you are betting on America. Well, who wants to bet against it? I mean just look at the record and we haven't come close to tapping our human potential. This country's best days lie ahead of us.

查理·罗斯:挖掘人的潜能,因为科学飞速发展,其他一切领域也——

Charlie Rose: Tapping our human potential because science is moving forward so fast and every other kind of --

沃伦·巴菲特:一切,一切。

Warren Buffett: Everything, everything.

查理·罗斯:说到你父亲,还有一件有意思的事——你知道我跟他聊过很多回。IBM,你们投了 IBM,尽管你爸总说,我不碰那些我可能搞不懂的科技股。可 IBM 也碰上麻烦了。

Charlie Rose: Now, here is the other interesting thing about your dad, who as you know I have had many, many conversations with. IBM, you made an investment in IBM, not withstanding the fact that you always said I don't want to invest in things that have to do with technology that I might not understand. They have seemed to have run into a rough patch too.

沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,我敢肯定吉尼·罗梅蒂对今年的某些方面感到失望,但今年他们的盈利会比以往任何时候都多。

Warren Buffett: Well, I am sure the Ginni Rometty is disappointed with some aspects of this year, but they are going to earn more money this year than they ever will.

查理·罗斯:那来自中国的订单——

Charlie Rose: And orders from China --

沃伦·巴菲特:一部分确实是这样。但你知道,他们今年的每股收益会创下历史新高。如果你期望更高的话,那可能会让人失望,但相信我,这已经是不错的成绩了。

Warren Buffett: Some of it yes. But they will have a record per share earnings this year, you know. I mean, that can be disappointing if you expected more, but it is not a bad record, believe me.

查理·罗斯:说到这儿,我想这是个好机会聊聊你的投资理念——你买 IBM 不是因为你猜他们下个季度、下下季度、再下个季度能做什么、股价会怎样。你得看这家公司的基本面,然后说,他们的路走对了。

Charlie Rose: And I mean this is a good place to talk in this conversation about that which is that, you know, you didn't invest in IBM because what you thought they might do and the stock price might do in the next quarter or the next quarter or the next quarter. You had to look at the fundamentals of the business and say they are on the right track.

沃伦·巴菲特:我不知道 IBM 在 1927 年或 1962 年第三季度赚了多少,我是说,最终每一家公司,包括伯克希尔,你知道,我们一路走来也遇到过不少小波折——

Warren Buffett: I don't know what IBM earned in the third quarter of 1927 or 1962 or, I mean in the end every company, including Berkshire, you know, we have had a fair number of blips over time --

查理·罗斯:对。

Charlie Rose: Right.

沃伦·巴菲特:——但只要我们走对路,长期来看自然会有好结果。而且我们有幸在这个全世界最棒的国家里经营,赶上了一股顺风。

Warren Buffett: -- but if we go the right things we will get the right results over time and we are fortunate to be operating in the best country in the world. We got a tailwind.

查理·罗斯:您的儿子写了《四十个机会》,您的孙子写了《在饥饿的世界里寻找希望》,后者还有您作序,序言里提到了您的妻子、母亲和祖母。很高兴见到您。霍华德

Charlie Rose: And so does your son, "Forty Chances", and your grandson, with a foreword by you with references to your wife and your mother and your grandmother, "Finding hope in a Hungry World". Great to meet you. HOWARD

沃伦·巴菲特:谢谢。

Warren Buffett: Thank you.

查理·罗斯:很高兴你回来了。

Charlie Rose: Great to have you back.

霍华德·格雷厄姆·巴菲特:很高兴回来。

Howard Graham Buffett: Nice to be back.

查理·罗斯:谢谢你,沃伦。

Charlie Rose: Thank you, Warren.

沃伦·巴菲特:谢谢,查理。

Warren Buffett: Thank you, Charlie.

查理·罗斯:马上回来,请别走开。

Charlie Rose: Back in a moment, stay with us.