普京的入侵提醒我们生活在一个有限的世界

2022 · 随笔 · 原文约 2442 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

普京入侵乌克兰

杰里米·格兰瑟姆观点

提醒我们,我们生活在一个有限的世界

执行摘要

资源价格趋于上涨的领域

作为人类物种,我们必须向全面可持续性跃进。使经济脱碳将极度消耗资源,而所有关键大宗商品的供应都是有限的。俄罗斯对乌克兰的疯狂进攻让一切都变得更加不可预测,但有一点是确定的——这场战争将在短期内加大对原材料的压力。它更广泛地提醒我们,我们将不得不围绕那些几乎肯定会出现的瓶颈、短缺、价格飙升和气候破坏进行创新,才能有望生存下去并讲述这一切。

杰里米·格兰瑟姆 | 2022 年 4 月

引言

太空船地球,连同它所在的局部星系,正以超过每秒 600 英里的速度穿过我们这一片宇宙。好消息是,尚未出现克林贡战斗巡洋舰。坏消息是,没有空间站可以让我们停下来修理和补给。我们只有随船携带的有限资源。其中一些可以回收,但许多资源,包括金属和化石燃料,一旦使用就无法再造,且常常变成有害废弃物。我们在太空船地球上的自然栖息地极其复杂,却几乎完美地适应了人类这个物种。不过,它对滥用极为敏感,而且已经轻易并严重地遭到破坏。我们的太空船,与所有太空船一样,不仅对资源承载能力有限,对使用资源的人数也有限。我们这艘太空船面临的挑战是:舰桥上既无指挥官,也无规则。我们人类在几千年的生存过程中,习得了一种“不惜一切手段先拿到眼下需要的东西!”的风格。从来没有人有动力去担忧遥远的未来,所以我们从不担忧。我们当前的态度被肯尼思·博尔丁描述为“牛仔经济学”,受无限边疆精神驱使,先开枪(或钻井),再问后果。遗憾的是,这种自然反应必须改变,而且必须迅速改变,因为在几十万年后,我们终于接近了物质增长的极限。或许我们已经进入了资源使用的最后一次翻倍,而此前我们已经翻倍了无数次。我们现在必须向全面可持续性跃进,否则太空船地球作为人类物种的避风港,将迎来悲惨的结局。

PUTIN'S INVASION JEREMY GRANTHAM VIEWPOINTS REMINDS US THAT WE LIVE IN A FINITE WORLD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In Which Resource Prices Tend to Rise As a species, we must make the jump Jeremy Grantham | April 2022 to full sustainability. Decarbonizing our economy will be spectacularly resource intensive, and all key commodities required are finite in supply. Russia’s Introduction desperate attack on Ukraine makes Spaceship Earth, together with its local galaxies, is speeding through our part of the everything more unpredictable but for universe at over 600 miles per second. The good news is that no Klingon battle cruisers one certainty – this war will increase have yet appeared. The bad news is that there are no space stations that we can stop the pressure on raw materials in the at for repairs and supplies. We have only the limited resources that we carry with short term. It serves as a reminder more us. Some of these can be recycled, but many, including metals and fossil fuels, once broadly that we will have to innovate used cannot be reconstituted and often become damaging waste. Our natural habitat around the bottlenecks, shortages, price on Spaceship Earth is incredibly complex but almost perfectly suited to our species. spikes, and climate damage that are It is, though, extremely sensitive to misuse and has been easily and substantially almost certainly coming our way so that damaged. Our spaceship, like every spaceship, has a limited carrying capacity for not we might survive to tell the tale. only resources but also the people using them. A challenge to our particular spaceship is that on our bridge there is no commander and there are no rules. Our species, as it learned to survive over millennia, has adopted a style of "get what you need now by any means possible!" There has been no incentive to worry about the distant future, and so we don't. Our current attitude has been described by Kenneth Boulding as “cowboy economics,” driven by the spirit of the limitless frontier, where we shoot (or drill) first and ask about consequences later. Regrettably this natural response must change, and change fast, for finally after a few hundred thousand years we are approaching our limits to physical growth. Perhaps we are already into our last doubling in resource use, having doubled many, many times before. We must now make the jump to full sustainability, or Spaceship Earth as a haven for our species will come to a sticky end.

“任何认为指数级增长可以在一个有限世界里永远持续下去的人,要么是疯子,要么是经济学家。”——肯尼思·博尔丁

一个简单却常被忽视的事实是:现代经济所需的所有关键大宗商品,其供应都是有限的,而且最便宜、品质最好的早已被率先开采殆尽。地球地壳中仍有大量石油,但最佳资源已经耗尽:曾经遍地都是简单自喷井,如今我们则巧妙地从固体岩石——委婉地称之为页岩——中榨取石油,或者在巴西近海深入海底数英里处钻探。

"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist." - Kenneth Boulding The simple fact, often ignored, is that all key commodities required by the modern economy are finite in supply, and the cheapest and best have gone first. There is still plenty of oil in the Earth's crust, but the best resources have gone: where simple gushers once were common, we now ingeniously torture the solid rock – euphemistically known as shale – or drill miles below the deep seabed offshore Brazil.

结果,石油的实际价格走势已攀升至 1965 年水平的 3 到 4 倍,尽管能源行业进行了难以想象的创新。这一点在图表 1 中有所体现。石油是第一种经历重要大宗商品范式转变的品种,早在 1970 年代初期就突破了长期横盘的趋势,其价格走势开始上行,而其他大宗商品的价格继续下跌。从这个意义上说,它对于其他大宗商品而言就像矿井里的金丝雀,大约 30 年后,这些商品的价格也开始上涨。

As a result, the real price trend of oil has reached 3 or 4 times its 1965 level in spite of incredible innovation by the energy industry. This is shown in Exhibit 1. Oil was the first important commodity paradigm shift, breaking out of a long flat trend back in the early 1970s, with its price trend rising as the prices of other commodities continued to fall. In this sense it was the canary in the mine for other commodities, whose prices also began to rise about 30 years later.

普京的入侵提醒我们,我们生活在一个有限的世界里 | p2 图表 1:WTI 原油实际价格(以 2022 年美元计算) 1 1900 年 1 1910 年 1 1920 年 1 1930 年 1 1940 年 1 1950 年 1 1960 年 1 1970 年 1 1980 年 1 1990 年 1 2000 年 1 2010 年 1 2020 年 数据截至 2022 年 3 月 31 日 | 来源:Global Financial Data,GMO

Putin's Invasion Reminds Us That We Live in a Finite World | p2 EXHIBIT 1: REAL PRICE OF WTI CRUDE OIL, IN 2022 $ 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 As of 3/31/2022 | Source: Global Financial Data, GMO This is shown in Exhibit 2, GMO's graph of 36 important commodities equally weighted. This shows the original 100-year decline interrupted in only three exceptional circumstances. But after the year 2000, the trend changed and prices began to rise under the pressure of unrelenting growth in China, whose global share of important commodities, like iron ore, cement, and coal, rose to 50% by 2013 from around 5% in 1980, by far the most impressive leap in history.

图表 2GMO 商品指数

一战 石油危机 中国冲击 二战

“但许多最重要的工业金属极为稀缺,最好的矿藏已被消耗殆尽。”

大萧条 1900-2002:年化趋势线 -1%

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

截至 2022 年 3 月 31 日 | 数据来源:Global Financial Data, GMO

EXHIBIT 2GMO COMMODITY INDEX WWI Oil Shock China Shock WWII “ But many of the most important industrial Great Depression 1900-2002: -1% annual trendline metals are extremely 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 scarce, and the best As of 3/31/2022 | Source: Global Financial Data, GMO deposits have already been consumed.

庆幸的是,许多重要资源被大自然完全循环利用:想想水从最污染的污泥中蒸发,又以纯净雨水降落,往往正好降落在我们最需要的地方。即便是一些有限资源,幸运的是也并不算稀有。例如,铁和铝储量丰富,足以供应人类文明未来数千年(尽管它们特别能耗的生产过程必须尽快脱碳)。但许多最重要的工业金属极其稀缺,而且最佳矿藏已经被消耗殆尽。例如,据估计,活跃铜矿的平均品位已从 100 年前的约 2.5% 下降到今天的约 0.5%。镍、锂、钴和铜对现代经济都至关重要——对工业脱碳尤为关键——但每一种仅占地壳的 0.002% 到 0.006%,相比之下铁占 5%,铝占 8%。

Thankfully, many vital resources are fully recycled by nature: think of water evaporating from the most polluted sludge and falling as pure rain, often exactly where we need it. Even a few of our finite resources are fortunately not at all rare. For instance, iron and aluminium are abundant enough to supply civilization for millennia to come (although their particularly energy-intensive production must urgently be decarbonized). But many of the most important industrial metals are extremely scarce, and the best deposits have already been consumed. The average ore grade of active copper mines, for example, is estimated to have fallen from about 2.5% 100 years ago to about 0.5% today. Nickel, lithium, cobalt, and copper are all essential to the modern Putin's Invasion Reminds Us That We Live in a Finite World | p3 economy – and particularly critical for decarbonizing industry – but each makes up only 0.002% to 0.006% of the Earth's crust, compared to iron at 5% and aluminium at 8%.

与此同时,发展中国家的人口仍在快速增长,这些国家会效仿中国。每个人都想变得更富有,而历史上,“更富有”意味着资源消耗强度的数倍增加,其中能源尤其与增长率紧密相关。因此,我相信,在未来几十年里,全球发展的长期需求激增将反复驱动大宗商品的繁荣周期。而现在,当我们面临脱碳这一紧迫甚至关乎存亡的需求时,应该意识到一个重大且出乎意料的讽刺:大规模部署风力发电机、太阳能农场和输电线路,其资源消耗强度将惊人地巨大。恰恰是那些供应最为紧张的金属,即将面临的需求扩张将最为前所未有。例如,到 2050 年,电动汽车行业消耗的锂可能达到目前全球年供应量的 15 倍!能源形势同样糟糕,甚至更被低估。从风能或太阳能农场发电 30 到 40 年所需的几乎所有投资都是前期投入——无论以资金、资源还是能源来衡量。即便是给房屋加装隔热层这类基本措施,也需要先进行实际投资,其后才能获得回报。化石燃料时代最后的讽刺或许在于:长期摆脱化石燃料,需要我们在短期内再燃烧一波化石燃料。我们改造电网的速度越快,能源紧张的局面就越严重,而我们又不能冒着行动迟缓的风险。只有在这一切之后,化石燃料的价格才会下跌——首先是石油,它将受到电动汽车快速崛起的冲击;随后是天然气和煤炭,它们最初将用于满足电动汽车(及其他电气化)带来的电力需求激增,其价格可能将在石油见顶几年后才达到高点。

Meanwhile, the population of the developing world is still growing rapidly, and these countries will want to emulate China. Everyone wants to be richer, and richer has “ historically meant multiples of resource intensity, with energy in particular being closely tied to the growth rate. Consequently, I believe the long demand surge of global I believe the long development will drive repeated commodity boom cycles for many decades to come. demand surge of global And now, as we are faced with the urgent, even existential need to decarbonize the development will drive economy, we should realize a major and unexpected irony: large-scale deployment of repeated commodity windmills, solar farms, and transmission lines will be spectacularly resource intensive. It is for precisely those metals which are most constrained that the coming demand boom cycles for many expansion will be the most unprecedented. The electric vehicle (EV) industry, for decades to come. example, is likely to consume 15 times the current annual global lithium supply by 2050! And the energy situation is just as bad and even more underappreciated. Nearly all of the investment to generate 30 or 40 years of power from a wind or solar farm is up front – whether measured in money, resources, or energy. Even basic measures like insulating homes require real investment first with their payoff later. Perhaps the last great irony of the fossil fuel era will be that going off fossil fuels in the long run will require using one more spurt of fossil fuels in the short run. The quicker we convert our power grid, the worse the energy squeeze will be, and we cannot risk moving slowly. Only afterwards will fossil fuel prices decline – led by oil, which will be hit by the rapid rise of EVs, and followed later by gas and coal, which will at first be needed to meet the spike in electricity demand from these EVs (and other electrification) and whose prices will likely top out several years after oil.

突然之间,我们要面对俄罗斯对乌克兰发起的疯狂进攻。这场战争会持续多久、激烈到什么程度,我们一无所知;它对后果的影响——往最好的方向想(如果我们足够幸运),可能是一次国际关系的积极调整;往最坏的方向想(我们祈祷不要发生),可能是动用核武器——我们更无从判断。这场进攻让本就敏感的世界雪上加霜:利率和通胀在攀升,本就极高的资产价格开始摇摆不定,如今一切变得更加不可预测。

Suddenly we have been confronted by Russia’s desperate attack on Ukraine. We know nothing about the length and severity of this war and even less about its consequences, which could range from a positive reset to international relations if we're very lucky to the use of nuclear weapons (we pray not) if we’re very unlucky. This attack takes an already sensitive world, dealing with interest rates and inflation rising and with extremely high asset prices beginning to wobble, and makes everything even more unpredictable.

一个罕见但已显而易见的事实是:这场战争将加剧原材料压力。我们感受最直接的是燃料,但对全球稳定而言,最危险的可能是粮食。根据联合国粮农组织食品价格指数,此次入侵已导致小麦、玉米、植物油和化肥价格从本就创纪录的水平迅速上升。每当大宗商品价格上涨,收入受到挤压,成本同步上升,就会动摇经济乃至政治体系。乌克兰和俄罗斯合计占全球小麦出口的四分之一以上,而乌克兰小麦两个月后的收成显然面临极大风险。对小麦尤其依赖的埃及,其一半以上的小麦进口来自这两个国家。值得记住的是,阿拉伯之春时涌向解放广场的呼声是“面包、自由、尊严”。

A rare certainty though – already being seen – is that this war will increase the pressure on raw materials. We notice fuel the most, but food may be the most dangerous to global stability. The invasion has caused the price of wheat, corn, vegetable oil, and fertilizer to rise rapidly from a level that was already at a record, according to the UN FAO's Food Price Index. And whenever commodity prices rise, incomes are squeezed while costs rise, destabilizing economies and even political systems. Ukraine and Russia together make up over a quarter of global wheat exports, and the harvesting of Ukraine’s wheat in two months is obviously at extreme risk. Egypt, which is particularly dependent on wheat, imports over half its wheat from the two countries. It is worth remembering that the chant going into Tahrir Square in the Arab Spring was “Bread, Freedom, Dignity.”

俄罗斯在全球钾肥和磷肥出口中也占据很大份额,没有这些投入品,大多数现代农业的生产力会迅速下降到商业可行性以下。即将到来的种植季肯定会被肥料短缺和涨价所影响,尤其是非洲,那里最无力承担,也是对俄罗斯肥料供应依赖程度最高的地区。

Russia also has a large share of the world’s export of both potassium (potash) and phosphorus (phosphate), without which inputs the productivity of most modern agriculture rapidly falls below commercial viability. This coming growing season will definitely be affected by shortages and higher prices of fertilizers, particularly in Africa, which is least able to afford it and is by far the most dependent on fertilizer supplies from Russia in particular.

普京入侵事件提醒我们,人类生存在一个有限的世界 | 第 4 页 杰里米·格兰瑟姆在西方,历史上像今天这样油价大幅飙升的情况,始终是经济衰退的前兆或导火索。经济衰退可能会暂时打断大宗商品价格的上涨势头,但从更长周期来看,资源价格的上涨趋势几乎必然会延续下去。

Putin's Invasion Reminds Us That We Live in a Finite World | p4 Jeremy Grantham In the West, historically, major spikes in the price of oil like today's have always Mr. Grantham co- preceded or triggered recession. A recession would likely interrupt the rise in founded GMO in 1977 commodity prices temporarily, but in the longer term it seems nearly certain that the and is a member of trend in resource prices will continue to rise.

GMO 的资产配置团队长期担任该公司的长期投资策略师。虽然他身处这个资源有限的星球,但过去 250 年来我们一直在试图做一件不可能的事:实现永续的复利增长。如果法老时代的埃及每年以 1% 的速度增长资产——这个增长率在我们看来微不足道——那么在其 3000 年的文明历程中,他们将复利增长 9.2 万亿倍!(不信你算算!)他是 GMO 董事会的成员,同时也在多家非营利组织的投资委员会任职。

GMO’s Asset Allocation team, serving as the And why would they not? Although we live on a finite planet, we have been attempting firm’s long-term investment strategist. He for the last 250 years to do the impossible: to generate perpetual compound growth. is a member of the GMO Board of Directors Had the Egypt of the Pharaohs grown its assets by 1% a year – a derisory growth rate and has also served on the investment to us – they would over the 3000 years of their civilization have compounded by 9.2 boards of several non-profit organizations. trillion times! (Check it!)

在创立 GMO 之前,格兰瑟姆先生是 Batterymarch Financial Management 的联合创始人(该公司成立于 1969 年),并于 1971 年率先提出商业指数化理念——尽管自称率先提出者不止他一人。他的投资生涯始于担任荷兰皇家壳牌的经济学家。格兰瑟姆先生在英国谢菲尔德大学获得学士学位,并在哈佛商学院获得工商管理硕士学位。他是美国艺术与科学学院院士、英国荣誉司令勋章(CBE)获得者,也是卡内基慈善奖章的获得者。

大多数古代文明都因过度消耗土壤、水和森林等资源而走向衰亡。我们当前的文明——大致上首个全球性文明——同样再次遭受过度消耗这些资源之苦,而且我们还面临金属和能源等新增的短缺。此外,这种过度消耗还造成了此前文明无法想象的破坏规模——废物、污染、毒害,以及众多自然资产的毁灭。

但一切并非毫无希望,因为对于过去那种破坏性的实体资产增长,我们还有另一种选择。我们需要大力加强对生活质量的关注,包括加大对剩余自然系统的保护力度,并强调产品的质量而非数量。优质产品在设计上会注重长寿命、可修复性和可回收性。随着这种重点的转变,加上新一轮的创新水平,我们或许能够真正实现可持续发展。

Prior to GMO’s founding, Mr. Grantham was co-founder of Batterymarch Financial Most ancient civilizations were brought down by overuse of their resources, such as Management in 1969 where he recommended soil, water, and forests. Our current civilization – the first to be more or less global – commercial indexing in 1971, one of several also suffers from overuse of those resources once again, but we add new shortages of claims to being first. He began his investment metals and energy. We also add a scale of damage from this overuse – waste, pollution, career as an economist with Royal Dutch toxicity, and the destruction of so many natural assets – that earlier civilization could Shell. Mr. Grantham earned his undergraduate never have imagined. degree from the University of Sheffield (U.K.) and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business But all is not hopeless, for there is an alternative to our past destructive growth in School. He is a member of the Academy of physical assets. We need to develop a much-increased emphasis on the quality of life, Arts and Sciences, holds a CBE from the UK including enhanced protection for what is left of our natural systems, and an emphasis and is a recipient of the Carnegie Medal for on the quality of our products as opposed to the quantity. Quality goods will emphasize Philanthropy. long life, repairability, and recyclability by design. With this shift in emphasis, together with a new level of innovation, we might make it to real sustainability.

免责声明 我们的物种,迄今为止,表现出不愿解决非常长期问题的倾向,比如气候变化和可持续性这类问题,而且也许它将始终如此。但我们同时也是异常善于创新的物种,这可能是我们的救赎之道。如果我们能在几乎肯定会到来的瓶颈、短缺、价格飙升和气候损害面前另辟蹊径,我们或许能够幸存下来,并讲述这个故事。

上述观点代表杰里米·格兰瑟姆截至 2022 年 4 月 6 日的看法,并且可能随时根据市场及其他条件发生变化。本文并非任何证券的买入或卖出要约或邀约,也不应被理解为该等文件。提及特定证券和发行人仅为说明目的,并非意图也不应被解释为买入或卖出此类证券的建议。

在必须迅速加强保护有限资源的同时实现全球经济脱碳,绝非易事。这将需要我们拿出从未有过的最佳精力和创造力。在最理想的情况下,为了取代我们对化石燃料的破坏性依赖,我们可能会在商业聚变、模块化裂变、深层地热能或大幅降低的能源储存成本等一个或多个领域取得突破——其中任何一个都可能拯救我们于水火。在较小规模上,我们肯定会有许多传统材料的生物衍生替代品,以及农业和工业效率方面成千上万种各类新发明。

Disclaimer Our species, so far, has shown itself reluctant to address very long-term issues, such The views expressed are the views of as climate damage and sustainability, and maybe it always will be reluctant. But we Jeremy Grantham through the period ending are also a remarkably inventive species, and this may be our saving grace. If we can April 6, 2022, and are subject to change innovate around the bottlenecks, shortages, price spikes, and climate damage that are at any time based on market and other almost certainly coming our way, we might survive to tell the tale. conditions. This is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security Decarbonizing the global economy at the same time as we have to become rapidly and should not be construed as such. more protective of our limited resources will not be easy. It will take the best period References to specific securities and issuers of energy and creativity we have ever had. At best, to replace our destructive reliance are for illustrative purposes only and are not on fossil fuels, we might have breakthroughs in one or more of commercial fusion, intended to be, and should not be interpreted modular fission, deep geothermal energy, or very much cheaper energy storage – as, recommendations to purchase or sell any one of which might save our bacon. On a smaller scale we will surely have new such securities. biologically derived substitutes for many traditional materials and a thousand new innovations of all kinds in agriculture and industrial efficiency.

版权所有 © 2022 GMO LLC。要取得成功,我们必须对这些领域的新思想和新研究不断加大投入。美国在风险投资行业和顶尖研究型大学中对此做得非常出色(令世界羡慕)。美国可能在某些商业领域有所退步,但在这些方面,美国确实堪称卓越,规模最大、实力最强。然而,总体规模仍然远远不够,因为企业和政府的研发投入几十年来非但没有增长,反而萎缩了。我们实现长期可持续性——甚至繁荣——的最佳途径,是让政府、企业和个人都全力支持美国这些非凡的优势:研究、创新、商业化,以及我们这个社会异乎寻常的愿意承担风险的态度(这也是美国备受推崇的国民特性)。作为一个相对稳定且宜居的全球社会,我们的集体存续可能取决于美国在所有上述领域的领导力。当我们进入一个环境破坏、资源稀缺和物理极限的新时代,我们将需要尽一切所能激发的创新与智慧。

Copyright © 2022 by GMO LLC. To succeed, we must put an increasing value on new ideas and new research in these All rights reserved. fields. The U.S. does much of this very well in its VC business and its great research universities (to the envy of the world). The U.S. may have slipped in some commercial areas, but in these it really is exceptional, the biggest and the best. But the collective scale is still far too small, for corporate and government R&D has for several decades shrunk rather than grown. Our best shot for long-term sustainability – even prosperity – is for government, business, and individuals to all get behind these exceptional strengths of the U.S.: research, innovation, commercialization, and our society's unusual willingness to take risk (also an American characteristic widely admired). Our collective survival as a reasonably stable and livable global society may depend on U.S. leadership in all these areas. As we enter the new age of environmental damage, scarcity, and physical limits, we will need all the innovation and ingenuity we can muster.