在动荡中赚钱与降低风险
在资产配置中赚钱与降低风险
GMO 投资方案相关洞察
■ 无基准配置策略
股票超级泡沫*
■ 另类配置策略
马特·卡德纳 | 2022 年 2 月
■ 股票错位策略
■ 质量策略
应对泡沫(尤其是超级泡沫)相关的职业风险向来棘手,也是投资管理行业最大的失败之一。1 GMO 致力于在宏观判断上做到正确。极端的市场环境,类似我们目前正在经历的,正是我们在历史上能够为投资者投资组合带来显著价值的地方。如下表所示,在市场极端情况下,我们采取了一些非常规举措,并持有了一些非常另类的投资组合。
■ 资源策略
■ 气候变化策略
MAKING MONEY AND REDUCING RISK IN AN ASSET ALLOCATION INSIGHTS Related GMO Investment Solutions ■ Benchmark-Free Allocation Strategy EQUITY SUPERBUBBLE* ■ Alternative Allocation Strategy Matt Kadnar | February 2022 ■ Equity Dislocation Strategy ■ Quality Strategy Navigating the career risk associated with bubbles (especially superbubbles) has ■ Resources Strategy always been tricky and is one of the biggest failings in the investment management industry.1 We at GMO dedicate ourselves to trying to get the big picture calls right. ■ Climate Change Strategy Extreme market environments, similar to the one we are experiencing currently, are where we have historically been able to add significant value to investors’ portfolios. As the table shows, we have made some unconventional moves and owned some very unconventional portfolios in the face of market extremes.
泡沫定位 GMO 1989 年日本股市泡沫 国际股票组合中日本配资为零 1999 年 TMT 泡沫 减少股票配置,聚焦价值股、REITs 和债券 2007 年全球金融危机/信贷泡沫 减少股票配置,聚焦美国优质股和多空策略 2022 年股票超级泡沫 减少股票配置,聚焦美国以外价值股和另类策略;股票错位仓位 20%(旨在从成长股泡沫破裂中获利);适度固定收益,无美国国债,仅限专业信贷 当我们走过 GMO 历史上的第四个“泡沫时代”时,我们再次调整了资产配置组合,以降低风险并抓住我们认为可通过资产配置创造超额收益的千载难逢的机会。* 本文最初作为杰里米·格兰瑟姆 2022 年 1 月观点文章《让股票错位开始:押注成长股泡沫 ——(走向终结)美国首次泡沫盛宴:房地产、股票、债券和大宗商品》的附录发表。
Bubble GMO Positioning 1989 Japanese Equity Bubble Zero weight in Japan in International Equity portfolio 1999 TMT Bubble Reduced equity, focus on Value stocks, REITs, and bonds 2007 Global Financial Crisis/Risk Bubble Reduced equity, focus on U.S. Quality and long/short strategies 2022 Equity Superbubble Reduced equity, focus on non-U.S. Value and alternative strategies; Equity Dislocation at 20% (designed to profit from Growth bubble bursting); modest fixed income, no Treasuries, and only specialized credit As we move through the fourth “bubble era” in GMO’s history, we have once again positioned our Asset Allocation portfolios to reduce risk and take advantage of what we believe will be a generational opportunity for adding alpha through asset allocation. * This article originally appeared as an addendum to Jeremy Grantham's January 2022 Viewpoints, "Let the Equity Dislocation: Betting on the Bubble in Growth Wild Rumpus Begin - (Approaching the End of) The First Stocks Bursting U.S. Bubble Extravaganza: Housing, Equities, Bonds, and Commodities."
尽管美国整体市场正如杰里米·格兰瑟姆最近指出的那样¹处于泡沫区域,但泡沫的震中——无论在美国国内还是国外——都集中在成长股上。²因此,在我们的旗舰产品“无基准配置策略”(以及“另类配置策略”)中,最大的风险头寸是做多一个全球价值股投资组合,同时做空一个全球成长股投资组合。为了构建这些组合,我们使用了一套专有的“价值”与“成长”定义,旨在评估公司的内在价值,并且在我们看来,这比传统的价值指标或指数提供了更好的估值视角。事实证明,这种做法极为成功:在像 2021 年这样的特殊年份,全球范围内价值股跑赢成长股 200 个基点,而我们这套定制方法产生了约 1,500 个基点的超额收益。我们相信,这一持仓仍有很大空间继续保持强劲的超额表现。该投资组合可通过“股权错位策略”直接进行投资。我们还与一位客户合作,构建了一个纯做空美国成长股的投资组合,重点关注成长股领域中最昂贵的那些股票。我们认为,这类组合是对许多人在科技领域的私募股权和风险投资中获得巨额收益的一种极佳对冲。
有限的股票风险敞口与聚焦最吸引人的领域(价值、质量、主题)
在长短仓策略之外,我们已大幅降低了股票风险敞口,并重点配置了非美国股票,我们认为这些股票比其美国同行要便宜得多。我们已将风险敞口集中到全球非美国价值股上,包括新兴市场和日本的价值股。在我们看来,这些股票相对于美国股票显得非常便宜;就新兴市场和日本价值股(特别是日本小盘价值股)而言,它们在绝对价值上也颇具吸引力。日本还受益于与股东友好型改革、盈利能力改善以及净资产收益率提升相关的长期顺风。³
在我们的全球股票组合以及对基准敏感的全球资产配置组合中,我们还将一部分配置维持在我们的“质量策略”中,该策略由我们的焦点股票团队管理,通常由那些拥有深厚护城河、低杠杆率以及持续高盈利能力的优秀公司组成。我们看到,有些客户既希望维持对成长股的配置,又对整体估值持谨慎态度,因此他们将资金配置到我们的质量策略中。质量型股票通常具有更强的成长特征,但由于我们对估值的重视,我们的质量策略目前与价值股的相关性达到了 20 年来的最高点。资源类股票(很大程度上属于价值股的一部分)相对于世界其他地区也显得便宜。我们还看到客户将资金配置到我们的“资源策略”中,以对冲通胀。最后,我们提出了一个令人信服的理由来持有我们的“气候变化策略”,该策略旨在抓住与缓解气候变化影响相关的机遇。⁴资源策略和气候变化策略同样由我们的焦点股票团队管理,关键是,该团队在选股过程中非常注重估值纪律。
While the overall U.S. market is in bubble territory as Jeremy Grantham recently 1 outlined,2 the epicenter of the bubble – both at home and abroad – is concentrated See "Let the Wild Rumpus Begin." in Growth stocks. As such, the largest risk position in our flagship Benchmark-Free Allocation Strategy (as well as in our Alternative Allocation Strategy) is long a global See Jeremy Grantham’s April 2012 GMO White Paper, “My Sister's Pension Assets and Agency Problems (The Tension portfolio of Value stocks and short a global portfolio of Growth stocks. To build these between Protecting Your Job or Your Clients' Money).” portfolios, we use a proprietary definition of “Value” and “Growth” that aims to assess GMO ASSET ALLOCATION INSIGHTS Making Money and Reducing Risk in an Equity Superbubble | p2 Matt Kadnar the intrinsic value of companies and provides, in our view, a better lens on valuation Mr. Kadnar is a than traditional value metrics or indices. This approach has proved to be incredibly member of GMO’s successful: in an unusual year like 2021, where Value beat Growth by 200 bps globally, Asset Allocation our custom approach generated alpha of approximately 1,500 bps. We believe team. Prior to joining significant room remains for this holding to continue its strong outperformance. This GMO in 2004, he was portfolio is available for direct investment via the Equity Dislocation Strategy. We also an investment specialist and consultant have worked with a client to build a pure U.S. Growth short portfolio, with a focus on relations manager at Putnam Investments. the most expensive names in the Growth universe. We believe this particular type Previously, he served as in-house counsel for LPL Financial Services and as a senior of portfolio is an excellent hedge to the significant gains many have experienced via associate at Melick & Porter, LLP. Mr. Kadnar investments in technology-focused private equity and venture capital. has a B.S. from Boston College majoring in Finance and Philosophy and a J.D. from St. Limited Equity Risk and Focus on Most Attractive Pockets Louis University School of Law. He is a CFA (Value, Quality, Thematic) charterholder. Outside of long/short strategies, we have reduced our equity risk considerably and emphasized non-U.S. stocks, which we believe are considerably cheaper than their U.S. counterparts. We have concentrated our exposure to non-U.S. Value stocks globally, Disclaimer including those in Emerging Markets and Japan. To us, these stocks look very cheap The views expressed are the views of Matt relative to the U.S. and in the case of Emerging Markets and Japan Value, particularly Kadnar through the period ending February Japanese Small Value, they are attractive in absolute terms as well. Japan also 2022, and are subject to change at any benefits from secular tailwinds related to shareholder-friendly reforms and improved time based on market and other conditions. profitability and return on shareholder equity.3 This is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security and should In our Global Equity and our benchmark-sensitive Global Asset Allocation portfolios, not be construed as such. References we have also maintained an allocation to our Quality Strategy, managed by our Focused to specific securities and issuers are for Equity team and generally composed of outstanding companies with deep moats, low illustrative purposes only and are not levels of leverage, and consistent, high, profitability. We have seen clients who still intended to be, and should not be interpreted want to maintain an allocation to Growth but are cautious about overall valuations as, recommendations to purchase or sell allocate to our Quality Strategy. Quality generally has growthier characteristics, but such securities. because of our focus on valuation, our Quality Strategy is now more highly correlated to Value than at any point in the last 20 years. Resource equities, which are largely a Copyright © 2022 by GMO LLC. segment of Value, also look cheap relative to the rest of the world. We have also seen All rights reserved. clients allocate to our Resources Strategy as a hedge against inflation. Finally, we've made a compelling case for owning our Climate Change Strategy, which seeks to take advantage of opportunities related to mitigating the effects of climate change.4 The Resources and Climate Change portfolios are also managed by our Focused Equity team that, critically, maintains a significant valuation discipline in their stock selection.
在降低风险的同时赚钱
在泡沫中穿行充满了各种类型的风险——绝对风险、相对风险以及职业风险。
Making Money While Reducing Risk Navigating bubbles is fraught with all types of risk – absolute, relative, and career.
这次也不例外:均值回归何时会开始,本质上无从知晓。
This time is no different: when mean reversion will begin is inherently unknowable.
不过,当今市场上仍有大把机会可以赚钱并降低风险,就像 1987 年、1999 年和 2008 年那样。我们知道,卖出赢家、重新平衡买入输家是良好的投资纪律,但由于种种行为层面的原因,真正做到这一点极其困难。鉴于我们今天所看到的股票超级泡沫,这一投资纪律尤为关键。
However, there remain significant opportunities to make money and reduce risk in today’s market, just as there were in 1987, 1999, and 2008. We know that selling winners and rebalancing into losers is good investment discipline but incredibly difficult to do for a whole host of behavioral reasons. That investment discipline is particularly critical given the equity superbubble we see today.
参见《日本股票:根深蒂固的认知忽视了正在改善的现实》一文,作者为 Drew Edwards 和 Rick Friedman(2022 年 1 月)。
See “Japan Equities: Entrenched Perceptions Ignore Improving Reality,” by Drew Edwards and Rick Friedman (January 2022).
参见卢卡斯·怀特与杰里米·格兰瑟姆合著的《跳出框框思考:如何以及为何投资于气候变化策略》(2019 年 4 月)。
See "Thinking Outside the Box: How and Why to Invest in a Climate Change Strategy," by Lucas White and Jeremy Grantham (April 2019).