耶鲁捐赠基金2011年（耶鲁投资办公室年度报告）

Right: Aerial view of Timothy Dwight College.

Introduction Yale’s Endowment performed strongly in fiscal year 2011, as returns of 21.9 percent produced an investment gain of $3.6 billion.

Over the past ten years, the Endowment grew from $10.7 billion to $19.4 billion. With annual net investment returns of 10.1 percent, the Endowment’s performance exceeded its benchmark and outpaced institutional fund indices. The Yale Endowment’s twenty-year record of 14.2 percent per annum produced a 2011 Endowment value of more than seven times that of 1991. Yale’s long-term record results from disciplined and diversified asset allocation policies and superior active management results.

Spending from the Endowment grew during the last decade from $338 million to $987 million, an annual growth rate of approximately 11 percent. On a relative basis, Endowment contributions expanded from 25 percent of total revenues in fiscal 2001 to 36 percent in fiscal 2011. Next year, spending will amount to $992 million, or 37 percent of projected revenues. Yale’s spending and investment policies have provided substantial levels of cash flow to the operating budget for current scholars while preserving Endowment purchasing power for future generations.

Endowment Growth Outpaces Inflation 1950–2011 $26 $24 $22 $20 $18 $16 $14 Billions $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1950 Endowment Inflated Post-1950 Endowment Gifts Inflated Endowment Market Value Separation of Real Assets into Natural Resources and Real Estate In June 2011, Yale separated its real assets provide greater global exposure than does prices should rise when the U.S. dollar portfolio into the component parts of natu- real estate, although they are somewhat less depreciates relative to other currencies. ral resources and real estate, establishing globally driven than oil. North American Moreover, because Yale consumes some each as a separate asset class. The change natural gas, for example, is essentially a commodities directly—energy and con-acknowledges some fundamental di≠er- regional commodity, with processing and struction materials, for example—Univerences between the asset classes’ underlying regulatory hurdles limiting its export sity inflation increases as energy and other characteristics and highlights natural potential. commodity prices rise. Endowment natural resources’ growing importance in the Natural resources investments provide resource investments mitigate the e≠ects portfolio. inflation protection to Yale, but with trans- of that inflation. Furthermore, exposure For over a decade, the Endowment clas- mission dynamics somewhat di≠erent from to commodities provides some protection sified real estate, timberland, and oil and those in real estate. Dollar-denominated against raw materials inflation that Yale gas as subsets of its real assets portfolio natural resources provide direct protection experiences through the importation of because all three share important underly- against unanticipated inflation, as their finished goods. ing characteristics. In particular, each asset type consists mostly of investments in illiquid physical assets that provide claims on future income streams that tend to track inflation.

Despite important similarities, the com-ponents of real assets are not homogeneous. Indeed, the heterogeneity within real assets provided important diversification as the asset class grew to more than 30 per-cent of the Endowment. The two new asset classes resulting from the split of real assets reflect important di≠erences in inflation sensitivity and asset price drivers.

While both real estate and natural resources provide inflation protection, the mechanisms and e≠ectiveness with which they accomplish this may di≠er. In the case of real estate, replacement cost—and there-fore ultimately market values—should increase with inflation. A particular asset’s response to a rise in price levels, however, is a function of both its lease structure and Real estate, previously part of the Yale real assets portfolio along with timberland and oil and gas, became the relationship between property supply a separate asset class for the University in 2011. and demand in the relevant local market.

When a market’s supply and demand are in equilibrium, lease structures determine how quickly assets respond to inflationary pressure. Properties with shorter-term leases exhibit greater sensitivity to inflation. In cases where supply and demand are in disequilibrium, prices do not neces-sarily follow the expected relationship between changes in replacement cost and inflation. In a supply-constrained market, rents may rise faster than inflation, while in an overbuilt market, rents may decline in spite of inflation.

In contrast, oil, gas, metals, and minerals are more directly exposed to global sup-ply and demand dynamics. Oil demand, for example, is increasingly a function of emerging markets’ growth as they consume an ever larger percentage of the world’s energy. Going forward, the rate of demand growth in emerging economies will be a crucial determinant of petroleum price levels. Timber and natural gas likewise A forest of Douglas firs, a variety of tree that is abundant in North America and often used in construction.

The Yale Endowment Totaling $19.4 billion on June 30, 2011, the Yale Endowment contains thousands of funds with a variety of designated purposes and restrictions. Approximately three-quarters of funds constitute true endowment, gifts restricted by donors to provide long-term funding for designated pur-poses. The remaining one-quarter represent quasi-endowment, monies that the Yale Corporation chooses to invest and treat as endowment. Donors frequently specify a particular purpose for gifts, creating endowments to fund professorships, teaching, and lectureships (24 per-cent), scholarships, fellowships, and prizes (17 percent), maintenance (4 percent), books (3 percent), and miscellaneous specific purposes (26 percent). Twenty-six percent of funds are unrestricted. Twenty-three per-cent of the Endowment benefits the overall University, with remaining funds focused on specific units, including the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (37 percent), the professional schools (26 percent), the library (7 per-cent), and other entities (7 percent). Although distinct in purpose or restriction, Endowment funds are commingled in an investment pool and tracked with unit accounting much like a large mutual fund. Endowment gifts of cash, securities, or property are valued and exchanged for units that represent a claim on a portion of the whole investment portfolio.

In fiscal 2011 the Endowment provided $987 million, or 36 per-cent, of the University’s $2.734 million operating income. Other major sources of revenues were grants and contracts of $684 million (25 per-cent), medical services of $493 million (18 percent), net tuition, room, and board of $243 million (9 percent), gifts of $110 million (4 percent), and other income and transfers of $217 million (8 percent).

Endowment Fund Allocation Operating Budget Revenue Fiscal Year 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 Endowment Professorships Unrestricted Other Income and Transfers Gifts Grants and Contracts Scholarships Tuition, Room, Miscellaneous and Board Specific Purposes Maintenance Books Medical Services Investment Policy Yale’s portfolio is structured using a combination of academic theory and informed market judgment. The theoretical framework relies on mean-variance analysis, an approach developed by Nobel laureates James Tobin and Harry Markowitz, both of whom conducted work on this important portfolio management tool at Yale’s Cowles Foundation. Using statistical techniques to combine expected returns, variances, and covariances of investment assets, Yale employs mean-variance analysis to estimate expected risk and return profiles of various asset allocation alternatives and to test sensitivity of results to changes in input assumptions. Because investment management involves as much art as science, qualitative considerations play an extremely important role in portfolio decisions. The definition of an asset class is quite subjective, requiring precise distinctions where none exist. Returns and correlations are di∞-cult to forecast. Historical data provide a guide, but must be modified to recognize structural changes and compensate for anomalous periods. Quantitative measures have di∞culty incorporating factors such as mar-ket liquidity or the influence of significant, low-probability events. In spite of the operational challenges, the rigor required in conducting mean-variance analysis brings an important perspective to the asset allocation process.

The combination of quantitative analysis and market judgment employed by Yale and the creation of a new asset class produces the following portfolio: June 2011 June 2011 Asset Class Actual Target Absolute Return 17.5% 17.0% Domestic Equity 6.7 7.0 Fixed Income 3.9 4.0 Foreign Equity 9.0 9.0 Natural Resources* 8.7 9.0 Private Equity 35.1 34.0 Real Estate 20.2 20.0 Cash -1.1 0.0 *The natural resources asset class was created on June 30, 2011.

The target mix of assets produces an expected real (after inflation) long-term growth rate of 6.2 percent with a risk (standard deviation of returns) of 15.2 percent. Because actual holdings di≠er from target levels, the actual allocation produces a portfolio expected to grow at 6.3 percent with a risk of 15.4 percent. The University’s measure of inflation is based on a basket of goods and services specific to higher education that tends to exceed the Consumer Price Index by approximately one percentage point.

At its June 2011 meeting, Yale’s Investment Committee adopted a number of changes to the University’s policy portfolio allocations. The Committee approved a modest increase in the private equity target from 33 percent to 34 percent. The Committee approved a similar increase of the total real assets target from 28 percent to 29 percent, and separated real assets into real estate (20 percent) and natural resources (9 percent). The increases in the illiquid asset classes were funded by a 2 percentage point decrease in the absolute return target allocation to 17 percent. The need to provide resources for current operations as well as preserve purchasing power of assets dictates investing for high returns, causing the Endowment to be biased toward equity. In addition, the University’s vulnerability to inflation further directs the Endowment away from fixed income and toward equity instruments. Hence, more than 95 percent of the Endowment is targeted for investment in assets expected to produce equity-like returns, through holdings of domestic and international securities, real estate, natural resources, and private equity. Over the past two decades, Yale reduced dramatically the Endow-ment’s dependence on domestic marketable securities by reallocating assets to nontraditional asset classes. In 1991, 53 percent of the Endow-ment was committed to U.S. stocks, bonds, and cash. Today, target allo-cations call for 11 percent in domestic marketable securities, while the diversifying assets of foreign equity, natural resources, private equity, absolute return strategies, and real estate dominate the Endowment, representing 89 percent of the target portfolio.

The heavy allocation to nontraditional asset classes stems from their return potential and diversifying power. Today’s actual and target portfolios have significantly higher expected returns and lower volatility than the 1991 portfolio. Alternative assets, by their very nature, tend to be less e∞ciently priced than traditional marketable securities, providing an opportunity to exploit market ine∞ciencies through active management. The Endowment’s long time horizon is well suited to exploit illiquid, less e∞cient markets such as venture capital, leveraged buyouts, oil and gas, timber, and real estate.

Philanthropists among Our Managers Yale hires external managers with an eye bikeathon to raise money for Dana-Farber, Bill approaches his philanthropy in the toward creating long-lasting partnerships for nineteen consecutive years, and in so same way he approaches venture capital: with outstanding individuals. In addition doing he has helped to raise over $8 mil- he backs people he calls “founders,” indi-to managing the University’s assets, many lion for Dana-Farber. viduals who change our world, who add of Yale’s managers invest their time and In 2010, Josh was honored as the value, who lead, inspire, and influence, all money to make the world a better place. National Association of Corporate Direc- done with passion, determination, and per-Below is a sample of six such managers tors (nacd) Nonprofit Director of the sistence. Bill supports a number of early who have done a remarkable job of not Year, in recognition of his commitment and pioneers in the global health field, includ-only creating value for Yale, but also lead- service to Dana-Farber as well as his con- ing Paul Farmer, Jim Yong Kim, and ing the way in the philanthropic world. tributions as a director of New Profit, City Ophelia Dahl. Year, Horizons for Homeless Children, and Bill’s other charitable activities include New Leaders for New Schools. work on the boards of The Steppingstone Josh has served Yale as a member of the Foundation, the Isabella Stewart Gardner University’s Investment Committee since Museum, the Broad Institute, the Damon 2000. He co-chaired the $3.5 billion Yale Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, the Tomorrow Campaign and was a major Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, donor for renovations of Saybrook College, the Harvard Management Company, and for construction of the School of Manage- Harvard Medical School. Bill serves as a ment campus, for Yale athletics, and for trustee of Dartmouth College, where he financial aid. chairs the investment committee.

Bill Helman—Greylock Partners Global Health “It takes the active engagement of multiple organizations to make this global health endeavor successful, and Daisy and I truly support the breaking down of traditional barriers in cooperative pursuit of a common goal, to bring quality health care to the world’s poorest places.”

Global health, a relatively new health Josh Bekenstein—Bain Capital care field, focuses on providing quality Dana-Farber Cancer Institute health care in the world’s poorest places.

“My partners and I are pleased that we The goal is to improve the health of the can actively support many great philan- poor and marginalized, build local capacity, thropic organizations that do so much to and improve communities through the improve our world.” alleviation of poverty. Bill and his family Dana-Farber Cancer Institute provides have traveled extensively, witnessing first-expert, compassionate care to children and hand the work of three organizations adults with cancer while advancing the through which they support global health: understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, Partners In Health, the Harvard Medical Seth Klarman—Baupost and prevention of cancer and related dis- School Department of Global Health and Facing History and Ourselves eases. As an a∞liate of Harvard Medical Social Justice, and the Brigham and “The leverage of Facing History is phe-School and a Comprehensive Cancer Women’s Hospital Division of Global nomenal. By training approximately 3,000 Center designated by the National Cancer Health Equity. teachers each year, most of whom will still Institute, Dana-Farber provides training be in the classroom ten to twenty years for new generations of physicians and sci-from now, Facing History is able to reach entists, designs programs that promote an estimated 1.5 million adolescents each public health among high-risk and under-year with its vitally important curriculum.” served populations, and disseminates Facing History and Ourselves, an inter-innovative patient therapies and scientific national educational and professional discoveries. development organization, engages stu-Josh Bekenstein’s work helps advance dents of diverse backgrounds in an exami-the battle against cancer. He is chairman nation of racism, prejudice, and anti-Semi-of the Institute’s board of trustees, and he tism in order to promote the development co-chaired Mission Possible, the Institute’s of a more humane and informed citizenry. recent campaign that raised $1.18 billion, The organization helps young people making the institute the first hospital in understand the sources of hatred and take New England to complete a $1 billion capi-responsibility for change by looking back at tal campaign. In addition, Josh has com-historical events. Facing History organizes pleted the Pan-Mass Challenge, a 200-mile workshops and seminars for teachers to their two-year teaching commitment, but learn the most current tools and resources over the rest of their lives.” available to teach students history. Teach for America (tfa) strives to erad-Seth Klarman served as the chair of the icate educational inequity by recruiting a board of directors for Facing History and diverse selection of America’s brightest Ourselves for the past sixteen years, step- college graduates to teach for two years ping down in November 2011. He currently in urban or rural communities within serves as co-chair of the board of trustees. the United States. Founded in 1990, tfa In these roles, Seth has worked on fund recruited, trained, and placed 500 teachers raising, the challenges and opportunities in its first year. Last year, the program related to organizational growth, and received more than 48,000 applicants to fill development of new resource materials 5,200 spots in the corps, attracting interest for educators. from 12 percent of all Ivy League seniors.

Seth is chairman of the Klarman Family In 2010, Yale was recognized by tfa as a Foundation, on the board of directors of top contributor of tfa members, placing the Broad Institute, chairman of the board third in the medium-school category. Over of directors for The David Project (Center the past three years, 129 Yale College sen-for Jewish Leadership), a vice chair of iors accepted full-time employment o≠ers Beth Israel Hospital’s board of managers, from tfa. a member of the board of directors of Yale, together with the Community The Israel Project, and a member of the Foundation for Greater New Haven, Board of Dean’s Advisors at Harvard pledged financial support to tfa that Business School. allowed the organization to start operations in New Haven and in Connecticut. Since tfa came to Connecticut, the University In September 2011, Yale announced that has given the organization more than Tom and his wife Kat Taylor donated $25 $700,000. million to launch the Energy Sciences Steve Mandel has served on the national Institute at the University’s West Campus. board of directors of Teach for America The institute will bring together physi-since 2005. Steve is one of the organiza- cists, chemists, geologists, biologists, and tion’s most dedicated advocates, joining the engineers to develop solutions to the Walton Family Foundation as one of two world’s energy challenges. Previously, Tom benefactors contributing over $50 million and Kat created and funded the TomKat in support of the program’s educational Center for Sustainable Energy at Stanford mission. Aside from his work on the University, which looks for ways to make national board, Steve founded and serves renewable energy technologies more on the Regional Advisory Board for a≠ordable and accessible.

Connecticut, helping to address educa- Tom recently partnered with former tional inequity in urban communities such Reagan administration Secretary of State as Bridgeport, Hartford, New Haven, and George Schultz to lead the opposition to Stamford. Proposition 23, a November 2011 ballot In addition to his work with tfa, Steve measure that would have suspended Cali-is the chair of the trustees of Dartmouth fornia’s landmark climate change law. Tom College, and served previously as a trustee pledged $5 million to the e≠ort and joined of Phillips Exeter Academy and The Chil- Schultz as co-chair of Californians for dren’s School in Stamford, Connecticut. Clean Energy and Jobs.

In 2001 he founded the Lone Pine Founda- Tom and Kat are co-founders of One Steve Mandel—Lone Pine Capital tion, an organization that aims to use edu- PacificCoast Bank (formerly OneCalifornia Teach for America cation to break the cycle of poverty by o≠- Bank), which pursues the vision of creating “The future of our society and our global ering grants to educational programs based a sustainable, meaningful community competitiveness depends on a much better in Connecticut, New York City, London, development bank. k-12 public education system. The dispar-and Hong Kong. Tom and Kat’s support of Yale includes ity in educational opportunity between funds for the Pierson College renovation rich and poor in this country is shameful Tom Steyer—Farallon and for the William C. Brainard Professor-and is the civil rights issue of the twenty-Energy Sciences Institute at Yale ship in Economics. In 2010, Tom and his first century. It will take many years, but wife joined Bill and Melinda Gates and Teach for America is the human capital “For me, figuring out what you care about Warren Bu≠ett in the Giving Pledge, a engine that is recruiting, training, and most and pursuing it passionately is not a commitment by some of the wealthiest inspiring thousands of this country’s most choice; it is life itself.” American families to donate more than half talented and relentless young leaders to Tom Steyer is a passionate advocate of of their wealth to charity during their life-eliminate this inequity, not just during environmental protection and clean energy. times or after their deaths.

Philanthropists (continued) Lei Zhang—Hillhouse Capital name in 1950, making it the first university Yale University and Renmin University established by the People’s Republic of China. Renmin holds a place as one of the “Peaches and plums do not have to talk, most prominent research institutions in yet the world beats a path to them.”

China, with a special emphasis on humani-—The Records of the Grand Historian ties and social sciences. Lei donated 10 (by Sima Qian) million rmb to set up the Hillhouse Lei Zhang contributed an auspicious (Gaoli) Academy at Renmin University. $8,888,888 to the Yale School of Manage-Lei serves on the board of bn Voca-ment in 2010. The gift, which was the tional School, China’s first tuition-free, largest that som has received from a grad-non-profit vocational school designed for uate of the school, will be used to support underprivileged children. The school construction of the school’s new campus as designs courses based on market demand well as to provide China-related scholar-and aims to equip students with both cul-ships. In addition, Lei’s generosity benetural and practical capabilities to be top-fited the Yale China and World Fellows tier skilled workers. Lei and his wife also programs. Lei made the gift with hopes of donate money for other educational pur-strengthening ties between Yale and China, poses, including scholarships in high which he believes will benefit students schools and elementary schools. from all backgrounds.

Lei was a founding member of the Also in 2010, Lei provided funds for United World College of Southeast Asia twenty students from his undergraduate (uwcsea) Foundation and helped to form alma mater, Renmin University of China, the investment committee of the first high to study for a summer at Yale University. school endowment in Singapore.

Renmin University acquired its current Manager Characteristics The Yale Investments O∞ce’s single most istics. Several manager relationships span with ever-changing market dynamics, ulti-important function is to develop invest- decades. For example, one of Yale’s private mately increasing the chances of delivering ment partnerships with extraordinary equity managers has been a close partner superior investment returns by putting investors. As a result, nothing matters for thirty years. people ahead of bureaucracy and structure. more than finding and working with high- Active managers worth hiring possess quality partners. The Investments O∞ce personal attributes that create reasonable Aligning Incentives sta≠ meets with countless prospective expectations of superior performance. Key The Investments O∞ce looks for ways investment managers each year. It then manager characteristics include a high level to mitigate the principal-agent conflicts narrows in on particularly compelling can- of integrity, a passion for investing, and an inherent in external manager relationships. didates, meeting with those managers sev- entrepreneurial orientation. Employing Partnering with ethical individuals is part eral times and conducting numerous layers investment managers with high moral of the solution, but ensuring that people of due diligence as it evaluates each man- standards reduces the likelihood of con-operate within properly constructed organ-ager’s potential. One successful manager flicts of interest, as ethical managers seriizations is equally important. Structural joked that the Investments O∞ce dug ously consider the goals of Yale when characteristics that play an important role so deep into his background that it inter- resolving conflicts. Top-notch managers in aligning incentives include the level of viewed his third-grade teacher. invest with passion, working to beat the management fees, form of incentive com-Yale chooses to partner with managers market with a nearly obsessive focus. pensation, and size of manager co-invest-with whom the University can develop They limit assets under management and ment. Yale prefers managers who are paid long-lasting relationships. The average make aggressive, unconventional security for superior performance, not for accumu-manager tenure in Yale’s portfolio is ten choices, assuming substantial risks with lating large amounts of assets under man-years, a period reflecting a suitable long- the hope of generating superior investment agement, and managers who invest mean-term orientation as well as responsiveness returns. Entrepreneurial firms provide the ingful amounts of their personal net worth to inevitable changes in manager character- greatest likelihood of dealing successfully alongside Yale’s capital.

Asset Class Yale’s seven asset classes are defined by di≠erences in their expected Characteristics response to economic conditions, such as price inflation or changes in interest rates, and are weighted in the Endowment portfolio by consider-ing risk-adjusted returns and correlations. The University combines the asset classes in such a way as to provide the highest expected return for a given level of risk.

Absolute Return In July 1990, Yale became the first institutional investor to pursue abso-lute return strategies as a distinct asset class, beginning with a target allo-cation of 15.0 percent. Designed to provide significant diversification to the Endowment, absolute return investments seek to generate high long-term real returns by exploiting market ine∞ciencies. Approximately half of the portfolio is dedicated to event-driven strategies, which rely on a very specific corporate event, such as a merger, spin-o≠, or bankruptcy restructuring to achieve a target price. The other half of the portfolio con-tains value-driven strategies, which involve hedged positions in assets or securities that diverge from underlying economic value. Today, the abso-lute return portfolio is targeted to be 17.0 percent of the Endowment, below the average educational institution’s allocation of 23.7 percent to such strategies. Absolute return strategies are expected to generate real returns of 6.0 percent with risk levels of 10.0 percent for event-driven strategies and 15.0 percent for value-driven strategies.

Unlike traditional marketable securities, absolute return invest-ments have historically provided returns largely independent of overall market moves. Over the past ten years, the portfolio exceeded expectations, returning 11.5 percent per year with low correlation to domestic stock and bond markets.

An important attribute of Yale’s investment strategy concerns the alignment of interests between investors and investment managers. To that end, absolute return accounts are structured with performance-related incentive fees, hurdle rates, and clawback provisions. In addition, managers invest significant sums alongside Yale, enabling the University to avoid many of the pitfalls of the principal-agent relationship.

Domestic Equity Financial theory predicts that equity holdings will generate returns superior to those of less risky assets such as bonds and cash. The predominant asset class in most U.S. institutional portfolios, domestic equity repre-sents a large, liquid, and heavily researched market. While the average educational institution invests 18.0 percent of assets in domestic equities, Yale’s target allocation to this asset class is only 7.0 percent. The domestic equity portfolio has an expected real return of 6.0 percent with a standard deviation of 20.0 percent. The Wilshire 5000 Index serves as the portfolio benchmark.

Despite recognizing that the U.S. equity market is highly e∞cient, Yale elects to pursue active management strategies, aspiring to outper-form the market index by a few percentage points annually. Because superior stock selection provides the most consistent and reliable opportunity for generating excess returns, the University favors managers with exceptional bottom-up fundamental research capabilities. Managers searching for out-of-favor securities often find stocks that are cheap in relation to current fundamental measures such as book value, earnings, or cash flow.

Fixed Income Fixed income assets generate stable flows of income, providing greater certainty of nominal cash flow than any other Endowment asset class. The bond portfolio exhibits a low covariance with other asset classes and serves as a hedge against financial accidents or periods of unanticipated deflation. While educational institutions maintain a substantial allocation to fixed income instruments and cash, averaging 12.4 percent, Yale’s target allocation to fixed income and cash constitutes only 4.0 percent of the Endowment. Bonds have an expected real return of 2.0 percent with risk of 10.0 percent. The Barclays Capital 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index serves as the portfolio benchmark.

Yale is not particularly attracted to fixed income assets, as they have the lowest historical expected returns of the seven asset classes that make up the Endowment. In addition, the government bond market is arguably the most e∞ciently priced asset class, o≠ering few opportunities to add significant value through active management. Based on skepticism of active fixed income strategies and belief in the e∞cacy of a highly structured approach to bond portfolio management, the Investments O∞ce chooses to manage Endowment bonds internally. In spite of an aversion to market timing strategies, credit risk, and call options, Yale manages to add value consistently in its management of the bond portfolio.

Night view of Ingalls Rink, home of Yale hockey.

Foreign Equity Foreign equity investments give the Endowment exposure to the global economy, providing diversification and the opportunity to earn outsized returns through active management. Yale allocates 4.0 percent of its port-folio to foreign developed markets and 2.5 percent of its portfolio to emerging markets. In addition, Yale dedicates 2.5 percent of the portfolio to opportunistic foreign positions, with the expectation that holdings will be concentrated in markets that o≠er the most compelling long-term opportunities, particularly China and India. Yale’s foreign equity target allocation of 9.0 percent stands below the average endowment’s allocation of 19.5 percent. Expected real returns for emerging equities are 7.0 percent with a risk level of 22.5 percent, while developed equities are expected to return 6.0 percent with risk of 20.0 percent. The portfolio is measured against a composite benchmark of (a) developed markets, measured by the Morgan Stanley Capital International (msci) Europe, Australasia, and Far East Index; (b) emerging markets, measured by the msci Emerging Markets Index; and, (c) opportunistic investments, measured by a custom blended index.

Yale’s investment approach to foreign equities emphasizes active management designed to uncover attractive opportunities and exploit market ine∞ciencies. As in the domestic equity portfolio, Yale favors managers with strong bottom-up fundamental research capabilities. Capital allocation to individual managers takes into consideration the country allocation of the foreign equity portfolio, the degree of confidence Yale possesses in a manager, and the appropriate asset size for a particular strategy. In addition, Yale attempts to exploit compelling undervaluations in countries, sectors, and styles by allocating additional capital and, perhaps, by hiring new managers to take advantage of the opportunities.

Silliman College courtyard.

Natural Resources Equity investments in natural resources—oil and gas, timberland, and metals and mining—share common risk and return characteristics: protection against unanticipated inflation, high and visible current cash flow, and opportunities to exploit ine∞ciencies. At the portfolio level, natural resource investments provide attractive return prospects and significant diversification. Yale has a 9.0 percent long-term policy allocation to natural resources with expected real returns of 6.0 percent and risk of 13.6 percent.

The natural resources portfolio—created by the split of the real assets portfolio at the June 2011 Investment Committee meeting—is a fundamental component of the Endowment, as it o≠ers powerful diversification and promises strong returns. Pricing ine∞ciencies in the asset class and opportunities to add value allow superior managers to generate excess returns over a market cycle. The inception-to-date return of Yale’s oil and gas (1986) and timber (1996) portfolio clocks in at an impressive 16.9 percent per annum.

Private Equity Private equity o≠ers extremely attractive long-term risk-adjusted return characteristics, stemming from the University’s strong stable of value-adding managers that exploit market ine∞ciencies. Yale’s private equity portfolio includes investments in venture capital and leveraged buyout partnerships. The University’s target allocation to private equity of 34.0 percent far exceeds the 10.7 percent actual allocation of the average educational institution. In aggregate, the private equity portfolio is expected to generate real returns of 10.5 percent with risk of 27.7 percent. Yale’s private equity program, one of the first of its kind, is regarded as among the best in the institutional investment community, and the University is frequently cited as a role model by other investors. Since inception, private equity investments have generated a 30.3 percent annualized return to the University. The success of Yale’s program led to a 1995 Harvard Business School case study—“Yale University Investments O∞ce”—by Professors Josh Lerner and Jay Light. The popular case study was updated numerous times, most recently in 2011.

Yale’s private equity assets concentrate on partnerships with firms that emphasize a value-added approach to investing. Such firms work closely with portfolio companies to create fundamentally more valuable entities, relying only secondarily on financial engineering to generate returns. Investments are made with an eye toward long-term relation-ships—generally, a commitment is expected to be the first of several—and toward the close alignment of the interests of general and limited partners. Yale avoids funds sponsored by financial institutions because of the conflicts of interest and sta≠ instability inherent in such situations.

Real Estate Investments in real estate provide meaningful diversification to the Endowment. A steady flow of income with equity upside creates a natural hedge against unanticipated inflation without a sacrifice of expected return. Yale’s 20.0 percent long-term policy allocation significantly exceeds the average endowment’s commitment of 4.4 percent. Expected real returns are 6.0 percent with risk of 17.5 percent.

The real estate portfolio plays a meaningful role in the Endow-ment as a powerful diversifying tool and a generator of strong returns. While real estate markets provide dramatically cyclical returns, pricing ine∞ciencies in the asset class and opportunities to add value allow superior managers to generate excess returns over longer time horizons. Since inception in 1978 the portfolio has returned 12.0 percent per annum. The illiquid nature of private real estate combined with the expensive and time-consuming process of completing transactions creates a high hurdle for casual investors. Real estate provides talented investment groups with the opportunity to generate strong returns through savvy acquisitions and managerial expertise. A critical component of Yale’s investment strategy is to create strong, long-term partnerships between the Investments O∞ce and its investment managers. In the last decade, Yale played a critical role in the development and growth of several organizations involved in the management of real estate.

Yale Educational Asset Allocations University Institution Mean Absolute Return 17.5% 23.7% Domestic Equity 6.7 18.0 Fixed Income 3.9 12.4 Foreign Equity 9.0 19.5 Natural Resources 8.7 8.6 Private Equity 35.1 10.7 Real Estate 20.2 4.4 Cash -1.1 2.4 Data as of June 30, 2011 Investments O∞ce Alumni Yale Investments O∞ce alumni have gone alumni include those at mit, Princeton, on to pursue careers in fields ranging from Bowdoin, and Wesleyan. yio alumni have investment management to business to a passion to work in the non-profit world government to law. Over the past twenty- and serve their communities, a reflection five years, forty-one men and women of the kind of people that the yio seeks to have joined and left the Endowment, hire. Below we provide brief profiles of after working for an average of 4.1 years. some of the Investments O∞ce’s alumni. Roughly 66 percent started work at the Investments O∞ce right out of college. Of Seth Alexander: President, those who left, about 33 percent went to mit Investment Management Company business school, predominantly at Harvard “I cannot imagine a better place to have or Stanford, 25 percent joined money man-learned the investment business than the agement firms, 20 percent attended law or Yale Investments O∞ce with its exception-graduate school, and 10 percent took lead-al leadership, fabulous team, and stanership positions at endowments or founda-dard-setting investment thinking.” tions. In the past year, three yio financial Seth Alexander joined the Investments analysts moved on to new challenges: Jon O∞ce after graduating from Yale College Rhinesmith left to pursue a ph.d. in eco-in 1995 with a degree in biology. During nomics at Harvard, Mike Schmidt went to his nearly eleven-year tenure at the yio, work at the Treasury Department in sup-Seth focused on the Endowment’s asset port of the Financial Stability Oversight allocation policies, as well as investments Council, and Tess Dearing departed to pur-in timber and foreign and domestic mar-sue an m.b.a. at Harvard Business School. ment base with a strong equity bias and ketable securities. He co-authored the Today, about 33 percent of yio alumni fostering long-term partnerships with paper “Illiquid Alternative Asset Fund hold leadership positions at endowments exceptional investment managers. Modeling” with Dean Takahashi, which or foundations; half of them hold the title presents a financial model that projects of chief investment o∞cer. In the founda- Andrew Golden: President, future asset values and cash flows of illiqtion world, Investments O∞ce alums man- Princeton University Investment Company uid alternative investments. In May 2006, age investment operations at Rockefeller Seth left Yale to manage mit’s endowment. “I often describe my time at the YIO as Foundation, Carnegie Corporation, and In that capacity he has pursued a strategy being the equivalent of a medical intern-Conrad H. Hilton Foundation. In higher focused on developing a diversified invest- ship and residency—it had that much education, endowments overseen by yio impact on my professional and, indeed, intellectual development.”

Andy Golden started at the Investments O∞ce as an intern while he was a student at the Yale School of Management, and joined as a full-time member after graduat-ing in 1989 with a master’s degree in public The yio o∞ces now occupy the fifth floor of this Yale-owned building in downtown New Haven.

Alumni (continued) and private management. In 1993 he left in 2008 to head the Hilton Foundation’s rate finance and mergers and acquisitions the yio for the Duke Management Com- investment portfolio, where he works with with clients such as Amazon.com, eBay, pany and since 1995 has headed Princeton’s Director of Investments Jay Kang, class of and aol. She is a graduate of Smith endowment, presiding over the Princeton 2002, another yio alum. In addition to his College, cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, and University Investment Company (prin- work with the foundation, Randy serves on holds an m.b.a. from Stanford Business co). Under Andy’s stewardship, princo’s the board of directors of the ucla Invest- School. assets have grown almost five-fold to more ment Company. Anne was a co-founder, board member, than $17 billion, net of $6 billion in distri- and board chair of the Packard Center for butions to university operations. In 2007 als Research at Johns Hopkins, an innova-the U.S. Treasury appointed Andy to the tive non-profit organization dedicated to Investors’ Committee of the President’s finding therapies for amyotrophic lateral Working Group on Financial Markets. In sclerosis. In addition, Anne serves on the addition to his position at princo, Andy investment committee of Smith College. serves on the advisory boards of a number She is currently co-chair of the National of private equity and venture capital firms, Rowing Foundation, a non-profit organiza-including Bain Capital, Greylock Partners, tion devoted to preparing the next genera-General Catalyst Partners, saif Partners, tion of world-class rowers for international and Northern Light Venture Capital. competition.

Anne rowed for the U.S. National Team, won a gold medal in the 1986 World Championships, and was a member of the 1988 Olympic team.

In 2010 she left the Endowment to become Wesleyan University’s chief investment o∞cer.

Anne Martin: Chief Investments O∞cer, Wesleyan University “I can’t imagine a better place than the Yale Investments O∞ce to learn the art and science of investment management.

I’ll always be thankful that David Swensen and Dean Takahashi took a leap of faith to bring me into the fold. It’s hard to imagine an environment that provides greater breadth in intellectual challenges, cutting-Randy Kim: Vice President and edge thinking, and exposure to the smart-Chief Investment O∞cer, est people in the investing world, a group Conrad N. Hilton Foundation that includes not only Yale’s investment “I will forever be grateful to David, Dean, managers but my colleagues within the and the rest of my former YIO colleagues Yale Investments O∞ce.” for ten years of invaluable investment Anne Martin joined the Investments training and personal mentorship. I am O∞ce in 2005. During her tenure at the Lauren Meserve: Deputy Chief blessed for the opportunity to have made yio, Anne worked primarily on the natural Investment O∞cer, so many great friends, and I wish my col- resources portfolio, helping the Endow-Metropolitan Museum of Art leagues at Yale every future success.” ment identify new opportunities in the oil Randy Kim joined the Investments and gas space. She also worked on the pri- “I view my time at the Yale Investments O∞ce after graduating from Yale College in vate equity portfolio, specifically focusing O∞ce as a continuation of my undergrad-1998 with degrees in economics and politi- on venture capital. uate education. Working with David and cal science. During his ten years at the yio, Prior to joining Yale, Anne worked as Dean, I learned something new every day.” Randy worked on the Endowment’s abso- a general partner of private equity firm Lauren Meserve joined the Investments lute return, domestic equity, and foreign Rosewood Capital, where she focused on O∞ce after graduating from Yale College equity portfolios. While working nearly Internet, software, and business service in 1993 with a degree in anthropology. She full-time for the yio, he earned an m.b.a. investments. Previously she was a manag- left the Endowment in 1996 to join the from the Yale School of Management in ing director at Alex. Brown in its technol- Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, where she 2004. Randy left the Investments O∞ce ogy practice, where she worked on corpo- collaborated on The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race professor John Geanakoplos. Jon started at at McKinsey, Kimberly joined the Packard in College and University Admissions (Bowen the yio focusing on overall Endowment Foundation in 2008 as it was starting to and Bok) and The Game of Life: College performance and absolute return. After expand its investment team. She is cur-Sports and Educational Values (Bowen and three years with the Investments O∞ce, he rently the foundation’s managing director Shulman). After her work at Mellon, she matriculated at Harvard University to pur- for marketable securities. pursued a master’s degree at Princeton sue a ph.d. in economics.

University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Xiaoning Wu: Senior Associate, Public and International A≠airs. Since Hillhouse Capital Management 2002, Lauren has worked in the invest-“The Investments O∞ce gave me an ments o∞ce of the Metropolitan Museum opportunity to interact with the smartest of Art, and since 2007 she has served as investors in the world. I couldn’t have had deputy chief investment o∞cer. In addition a more memorable learning experience.” to her work at the Met, Lauren serves on Xiaoning Wu first joined the Invest-the boards of the Wenner-Gren Founda-ments O∞ce as an intern during her tion for Anthropological Research and the undergraduate years at Yale College. An American Friends of the National Gallery, East Asian studies and economics double London. major, Xiaoning supplemented her academic endeavors by working at the Endow-Jonathan Rhinesmith: ph.d. Candidate, ment, researching investment opportunities Harvard Economics Department in Chinese equities. Following graduation, “YIO’s relentless e≠orts to fully under- Xiaoning postponed full-time employment stand investment issues, and at times at the O∞ce for one year and went to even to develop novel solutions to them, Beijing to study Chinese. created a thriving, collegial environment At the yio, Xiaoning focused on Yale’s that made the o∞ce an excellent place absolute return and emerging markets at which to learn about how financial portfolios. In that capacity she worked markets interact.” closely with the University’s China-focused Jonathan Rhinesmith joined the Invest- public equities fund, Hillhouse Capital ments O∞ce after graduating from Yale Management, ultimately doing two intern-Kimberly Sargent: Managing Director College in 2008 with a double degree in ships with the fund, the first while for Marketable Securities, physics and in economics and mathematics. at the Investments O∞ce and the second David and Lucile Packard Foundation As an undergraduate, Jon had a strong while at Stanford Business School. interest in economics, serving as the editor- “It was a great honor to be a small part of Xiaoning credits her time at the Invest-in-chief of the Yale Economic Review and a team of such talented investment profes- ments O∞ce with her development of a interning at Ellington, a hedge fund that sionals at the Yale Investments O∞ce for broad-based foundation in finance and boasts a relationship with Yale economics three years. As a recent college graduate, familiarity with a comprehensive spectrum I benefited from an intense lesson in all of investment strategies. aspects of the world of investment management. As a lover of learning, I was in an environment in which intellectual honesty and rigor were applied toward the challenge of earning superior returns.

And as someone who cared about doing good in the world, I was thrilled to see the results of our work go to benefit the University and the globe.”

Kimberly Sargent came to the Invest-ments O∞ce in 2001 from New York-based Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, a commercial law firm. During her three years at the Endowment, Kimberly focused on capital markets and international equi-ties. Kimberly, a Yale College history major, earned her cfa charter and, while at the O∞ce, helped Chief Investment O∞cer David Swensen with his second book, Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment.

Kimberly left the yio in 2004 to pursue an m.b.a. at Stanford Business School.

After consulting for financial institutions Spending Policy The spending rule is at the heart of fiscal discipline for an endowed insti- tution. Spending policies define an institution’s compromise between the conflicting goals of providing substantial support for current operations and preserving purchasing power of endowment assets. The spending rule must be clearly defined and consistently applied for the concept of budget balance to have meaning.

The Endowment spending policy, which allocates Endowment earnings to operations, balances the competing objectives of providing a stable flow of income to the operating budget and protecting the real value of the Endowment over time. The spending policy manages the trade-o≠ between these two objectives by using a long-term spending rate target combined with a smoothing rule, which adjusts spending in any given year gradually in response to changes in Endowment market value.

The target spending rate approved by the Yale Corporation cur-rently stands at 5.25 percent. According to the smoothing rule, Endow-ment spending in a given year sums to 80 percent of the previous year’s spending and 20 percent of the targeted long-term spending rate applied to the market value two years prior. The spending amount determined by the formula is adjusted for inflation and constrained so that the calculated rate is at least 4.5 percent, and not more than 6.0 percent, of the Endow-ment’s inflation-adjusted market value one year prior. The smoothing rule and the diversified nature of the Endowment are designed to miti-gate the impact of short-term market volatility on the flow of funds to support Yale’s operations.

Spending Growth Surpasses Inflation 1950–2011 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 Millions $600 $400 $200 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1950 Spending Inflated Spending from Post-1950 Endowment Gifts Inflated Actual Spending The spending rule has two implications. First, by incorporating the previous year’s spending, the rule eliminates large fluctuations, enabling the University to plan for its operating budget needs. Over the last twenty years, the standard deviation of annual changes in spending has been less than three-quarters that of annual changes in Endowment value. Second, by adjusting spending toward the long-term target spend-ing level, the rule ensures that spending will be sensitive to fluctuating Endowment market values, providing stability in long-term purchasing power.

Despite the conservative nature of Yale’s spending policy, distributions to the operating budget rose from $338 million in fiscal 2001 to $987 million in fiscal 2011. The University projects spending of $992 million from the Endowment in fiscal 2012, representing about 37 percent of revenues.

Kline Biology Tower, atop Science Hill. At left is a partial view of Kroon Hall, the home of Forestry & Environmental Studies, completed in 2009.

Yale Investments O∞ce Sta≠ The Endowment is managed by a team of Chartered Financial Analyst (cfa) investment professionals at the Yale Invest- examination. ments O∞ce. To keep pace with the grow- Once financial analysts develop their ing Endowment value, the investment financial literacy and analytical tools, they team has grown over the past quarter-cen- receive broad exposure to the investment tury and today consists of twenty-three process and various facets of Yale’s portfo-professionals, including a team of junior lio. Analyst functions include assessing analysts and an experienced senior sta≠. investment performance, examining the Each year, the O∞ce hires student interns, allocation of funds across di≠erent asset who number among the most impressive classes and investment strategies, and Yale College students. implementing the University’s ethical investing policy. They assist in the screen-Senior Sta≠ ing, selection, and monitoring of money managers through background research, The senior sta≠ at the Yale Investments manager meetings, and portfolio analysis.

O∞ce drive the decisions and overall direc-In line with Yale’s belief in the centrality of tion of the University’s Endowment. Led external managers to the investment man-by David Swensen, senior sta≠ members agement process, analysts travel the world focus their attention on key endowment to meet managers in person to build and management issues including setting asset strengthen long-standing investment allocation and conducting deep portfolio Alexander C. Banker, a Director (right), and relationships. reviews as well as on special topics like Senior Financial Analyst Cain P. Solto≠, during assessing the implications of fraud in man- an Investments O∞ce meeting. Interns agers’ portfolio companies. In addition to leading internal projects, senior sta≠ mem- Endowment with little or no portfolio The Yale Investments O∞ce hires student bers serve as the important link between management experience. Focused mentor- interns during the academic term and sum-Yale and its external managers; they work ships and extensive on-the-job training mer. Interns add horsepower to the O∞ce’s on evaluating, selecting, and monitoring develop the analysts’ investment abilities. capacity and strengthen the connection funds, they negotiate with managers on The collaborative, flat structure of the between the O∞ce sta≠ and the University. issues such as fund raising and fee struc- Investments O∞ce exposes analysts to the At the Investments O∞ce, interns gain tures, and they collaborate on discussions philosophy and thought process of Chief exposure to a wide range of asset classes regarding organizational development. Investment O∞cer David Swensen, Senior and investment strategies, assisting in the Consistent with the O∞ce’s emphasis Director Dean Takahashi, and the rest of screening and monitoring of funds through on teamwork and mentorship, senior sta≠ the team starting from day one. In their research, performance evaluation, and par-members actively involved their junior early years, analysts develop quantitative ticipation in manager meetings. They work colleagues in research, analysis, and portfo- skills, qualitative skills, and investment on a wide variety of strategic projects, such lio management. Such sharing breeds a instincts. In addition, all analysts at the as analyzing asset liquidity, industry bench-culture of spirited, intellectual discussions Investments O∞ce prepare and sit for the marks, and new investment opportunities. and encourages junior sta≠ to engage in the decision-making process early in their careers. Early responsibility prepares junior sta≠ to take on larger roles, enabling the Investments O∞ce to promote from within. One former financial analyst has remained with the O∞ce for the past two and a half decades and currently serves at the director level.

Financial Analysts Financial analysts perform much of the Endowment’s essential analysis. Yale’s financial analysts come from a variety of academic backgrounds, ranging from stu-dents who majored in history and biology to those with degrees in economics. The common thread among all analysts is an interest in Yale, a curiosity about investing, and the desire to explore those interests in an entrepreneurial, hands-on organization.

The Investments O∞ce’s financial analysts generally begin working for the A lively exchange during a meeting in the Yale Investments O∞ce.

O∞ce Culture In October 1987, Treasury Secretary Henry activities that promote a collegial culture. league, fielding full softball and basketball Paulson, then senior executive at Goldman Every summer, the Investments O∞ce teams. The teams create a sense of unity Sachs, spoke at Yale’s School of Manage- organizes a golf and tennis fundraiser to and pride among the sta≠ members as ment and articulated a compelling case for support New Haven youth and education. they compete against other departments. the ideal work environment. Paulson said For the past six years, the event (which was Reflecting a strong competitive spirit, the that high-quality individuals gravitate the brainchild of President Richard Levin Investments O∞ce teams have won two toward entitities that operate on the cutting and benefits from his consistent participa- championships in as many years. In the edge, that embrace a global strategy, that tion) raised in excess of $1 million each o∞ce, sta≠ members eat lunch together, provide opportunities to benefit from year to support Yale’s activities in the New and during late work nights they share focused mentorship, and that encourage Haven community. The O∞ce participates family-style dinners. early acceptance of significant responsi- in the University’s intramural sports bility. The Yale Investments O∞ce has worked to create such an environment over the past quarter-century.

After taking the helm of the Yale Endowment in 1985, David Swensen pio-neered a move away from traditional stock and bond investments and toward an illiquid, equity-biased portfolio. Since then, Yale has continued to innovate in the field of endowment management, identifying new opportunities, like timber investments, before they become mainstream. Under David Swensen’s and Dean Takahashi’s stewardship, the Endowment has taken a more global view; over the past twenty-seven years, Yale’s allocation to domestic equity declined from over 60 percent to 7 percent today, an acknowledgment of the abundance of attractive security mispric-ings outside of U.S. borders. The driver behind the Endowment’s cutting-edge, global work is its people.

The rigorous nature of the work at the Yale Investments O∞ce sta≠ pictured during a summer 2011 retreat at a wind power project site. Investments O∞ce attracts people who are Social gatherings like this play an important role in the life of the O∞ce and its collegial working climate. intellectually curious. Investments O∞ce employees enjoy digging deep into their research and developing unconventional approaches to the problems they face. In addition to an academic interest in their work, sta≠ share an interest in Yale and in doing meaningful work. The combination of those factors creates a strong culture in which people love what they do. That pas-sion attracts people who share the same values to join the O∞ce, creating a virtuous feedback loop.

The O∞ce is a collaborative, team-oriented workplace. Every Monday, the entire sta≠ meets to present and challenge ideas in a group setting. The meetings are com-prehensive and allow sta≠ members to participate in the Endowment’s investment process. In addition, the O∞ce’s team-oriented work environment fosters mentorship as new hires learn the requisite skills and strategies by working side-by-side with more experienced members of the O∞ce.

Outside of the o∞ce, the sta≠ members Softball provides the Investments O∞ce sta≠ a welcome break. The team, made up of full-time O∞ce organize and participate in a wide range of sta≠, interns, and family and friends, goes up against other Yale units in friendly competition.

Investment Performance Yale has produced excellent long-term investment returns. Over the ten- year period ending June 30, 2011, the Endowment earned an annualized 10.1 percent return, net of fees, surpassing annual results for domestic stocks of 3.7 percent and domestic bonds of 5.2 percent, and placing it in the top one percent of large institutional investors. Endowment outperformance stems from sound asset allocation policy and superior active management.

Yale’s long-term superior performance relative to its peers and benchmarks has created substantial wealth for the University. Over the ten years ending June 30, 2011, Yale added $7.6 billion relative to its composite benchmark and $7.4 billion relative to the average return of a broad universe of college and university endowments.

Performance by Yale’s long-term asset class performance continues to be outstanding. In the past ten years, every asset class posted superior returns, significantly Asset Class outperforming benchmark levels.

Over the past decade, the absolute return portfolio produced an annualized 10.2 percent, exceeding the passive benchmark of the One-Year Constant Maturity Treasury plus 6 percent by 1.2 percent per year and besting its active benchmark of hedge fund manager returns by 3.8 percent per year. For the ten-year period, absolute return results exhibited close to no correlation to traditional marketable securities. For the ten years ending June 30, 2011, the domestic equity port-folio returned an annualized 7.6 percent, outperforming the Wilshire 5000 by 3.7 percent per year and the Russell Median Manager return by 4.3 percent per year. Yale’s active managers have added value to bench-mark returns primarily through stock selection. Yale’s internally managed fixed income portfolio earned an annualized 5.2 percent over the past decade, staying in line with the Barclays Capital Treasury Index and exceeding the Russell Median Manager return by 0.4 percent per year. By making astute security selection decisions and accepting a moderate degree of illiquidity, the Endowment benefited from excess returns without incurring material credit or option risk.

Yale’s Performance Exceeds Peer Results Yale’s Performance Exceeds Peer Results 2001 to 2011, 2001=$100 $400 $300 $200 $100 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Endowment Mean of Broad Universe of Colleges and Universities Inflation The foreign equity portfolio generated an annual return of 18.6 percent over the ten-year period, outperforming its composite benchmark by 7.0 percent per year and the Russell Median Manager return by 7.4 percent per year. The portfolio’s excess return is due to astute country allocation and e≠ective security selection by active managers.

Private equity earned 10.2 percent annually over the last ten years, underperforming the passive benchmark of University inflation plus 10 percent by 3.1 percent per year and outperforming the return of a pool of private equity managers compiled by Cambridge Associates by 1.0 percent per year. Since inception in 1973, the private equity program has earned an astounding 30.3 percent per annum.

Real assets generated a 11.0 percent annualized return over the ten-year period, outperforming the passive benchmark of University inflation plus 6.0 percent by 2.5 percent per year and an active benchmark of real assets manager returns by 2.3 percent per year. Yale’s outperformance is due to successful exploitation of market ine∞ciencies and timely pursuit of contrarian investment strategies.

Yale Asset Class Results Beat Benchmarks 2001–2011 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Absolute Domestic Fixed Foreign Private Real Return Equity Income Equity Equity Assets Yale Return Active Benchmark Passive Benchmark Active Benchmarks Passive Benchmarks Absolute Return: csfb/Tremont Composite Absolute Return: 1-year Constant Maturity Treasury + 6% Domestic Equity: Frank Russell Median Manager, U.S. Equity Domestic Equity: Wilshire 5000 Fixed Income: Frank Russell Median Manager, Fixed Income Fixed Income: BarCap 1-5 Yr Treasury Foreign Equity: Frank Russell Median Manager Composite, Foreign Equity: Blend of msci eafe Index, msci em Foreign Equity Index, Custom Opportunistic Blended Index Private Equity: Cambridge Associates Composite Private Equity: University Inflation + 10% Real Assets: ncreif and Cambridge Associates Composite Real Assets: University Inflation + 6% Management and Since 1975, the Yale Corporation Investment Committee has been responsible for oversight of the Endowment, incorporating senior-level invest-Oversight ment experience into portfolio policy formulation. The Investment Committee consists of at least three Fellows of the Corporation and other persons who have particular investment expertise. The Committee meets quarterly, at which time members review asset allocation policies, Endow-ment performance, and strategies proposed by Investments O∞ce sta≠. The Committee approves guidelines for investment of the Endowment portfolio, specifying investment objectives, spending policy, and approaches for the investment of each asset category.

Investment Committee Douglas A. Warner, iii ’68 Richard C. Levin ’74 ph.d. Chairman President Former Chairman Yale University J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

Ranji Nagaswami ’86 m.b.a.

G. Leonard Baker ’64 Chief Investment O∞cer Managing Director City of New York Sutter Hill Ventures Carter Simonds ’99 Joshua Bekenstein ’80 Managing Director Managing Director Blue Ridge Capital Bain Capital Dinakar Singh ’90 Ben Inker ’92 ceo and Founding Partner Director of Asset Allocation tpg-Axon Capital GMO Fareed Zakaria ’86 Paul Joskow ’72 ph.d. Editor-at-Large President TIME Magazine Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Stefan Kaluzny ’88 Managing Director Sycamore Partners David Swensen and President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board (perab) In February 2009, with the country mired In turn, Mr. Volcker said, “David regulatory reform, and to the Treasury con-in the depths of the financial crisis, U.S. Swensen was a valuable member of perab, cerning housing and the mortgage market. President Barack Obama issued an execu- bringing dedication and years of practical I hope this or any future administration tive order to establish the President’s Eco- experience to the table. He was particularly will call on David’s insight and experience nomic Recovery Advisory Board (perab). helpful to me as we crafted our advice to when needed.” The purpose of the board was to provide the White House concerning financial independent, nonpartisan analysis and advice to President Obama as he and his sta≠ developed plans for America’s economic recovery.

The members of the board, charged with being “candid and unsparing in their assessment,” reflected a diverse collection of perspectives from a variety of sectors of the economy. With regard to his selections, President Obama said, “I created this board to enlist voices that come from beyond the echo chamber of Washington, d.c., and to ensure that no stone is unturned as we work to put people back to work and to get our economy moving.”

President Obama tapped David Swensen, Yale’s Chief Investment O∞cer, to serve on perab. The nomination recognized David’s unusual set of experiences and contributions to the world of finance throughout his career, during which he earned a ph.d. in economics from Yale, worked six years on Wall Street, led the Yale Endowment to robust returns for nearly two and a half decades, and advised on the finances of numerous entities rang-ing from The Brookings Institution and the University of Cambridge to the New York Stock Exchange and tiaa. Paul Volcker, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, was named Chairman of perab and Austan Goolsbee (’91) took the role of Sta≠ Director and Chief Economist. David had a number of opportunities to meet with the President in the Oval O∞ce to discuss financial issues, including the Volker Rule, the overall structure of financial regulatory reform, the regulation of Photographer: Chip Somodevilla. Collection: Getty Images News derivatives markets, and the appropriate role of the government in the mortgage finance industry.

After working with David for two years, Mr. Goolsbee said, “Dave Swensen set the standard for seriousness and good judg-ment as a member of perab. President Obama respected and sought out David’s advice. And whether it was about financial markets and regulation, housing and mort-gage finance, small business credit or many other subjects, he was always willing to study and analyze issues if the President needed it.”

U.S. President Barack Obama talks with Yale Chief Investment O∞cer David F. Swensen during a meeting of the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board (perab) in the State Dining Room at the White House on October 4, 2010 in Washington, d.c.

The Investments O∞ce manages the Endowment and other University financial assets, and defines and implements the University’s borrowing strategies. Headed by the Chief Investment O∞cer, the O∞ce currently consists of twenty-three professionals.

Investments O∞ce David F. Swensen ’80 ph.d. Michael E. Finnerty Chief Investment O∞cer Associate Director Dean J. Takahashi ’80, ’83 mppm Lisa M. Howie ’00, ’08 m.b.a. Senior Director Associate Director Peter H. Ammon ’05 m.b.a., ’05 m.a. R. Alexander Hetherington ’06 Director Senior Associate Alexander C. Banker Matthew S. T. Mendelsohn ’07 Director Senior Associate Alan S. Forman John V. Ricotta ’08 Director Senior Financial Analyst Timothy R. Sullivan ’86 Cain P. Solto≠ ’08 Director Senior Financial Analyst Stephanie S. Chan ’97 Nilesh V. Vashee ’09 Associate General Counsel Senior Financial Analyst Deborah S. Chung Xinchen Wang ’09 Associate General Counsel Senior Financial Analyst Kenneth R. Miller ’71 Florence R. Dethy ’11 Associate General Counsel Financial Analyst J. Colin Sullivan David S. Katzman ’10 Associate General Counsel Financial Analyst Carrie A. Abildgaard Sebastian K. Serra ’11 Associate Director Financial Analyst Kaiyuan Wang ’11 Financial Analyst Investment Committee A strong investment committee brings assistance between meetings, providing process and to provide support for the discipline to the endowment management feedback on past actions and suggesting investment sta≠, while avoiding actual process. By thoroughly and thoughtfully strategies for the future. Informed give- management of the portfolio. vetting investment recommendations, and-take elevates the investment dia- Yale’s Investment Committee has existed the committee inspires sta≠ to produce logue, challenging sta≠ and committee since 1975. The Committee has included ever more carefully considered proposals. to improve the quality of investment leaders in a number of fields, including Ideally, committees rarely exercise the decision making. finance, business, academia, government, power to reject sta≠ recommendations. Investment committee members should media, and the non-profit world, all of If a committee frequently turns down or be selected primarily for having good judg- whom share a passion for Yale. Below are revises investment proposals, the sta≠ ment. While no particular background profiles of the Chairmen of Yale’s Invest-encounters di∞culty in managing the qualifies an individual to serve on the com- ment Committee since its founding along portfolio. Investment opportunities often mittee, broad understanding of financial with the dates of their tenure. require negotiation of commitments sub- markets proves useful in overseeing the ject to board approval. If the board with- investment process. Aggregating a collec-holds approval with any degree of regular- tion of investment specialists occasionally ity, sta≠ loses credibility in the eyes of the poses dangers, particularly when commit-investment management community. That tee members attempt to manage the port-said, the committee must provide more folio, not the process. Successful executives than a rubber stamp for sta≠ recommen- bring a valuable perspective to the table dations. In a well-run organization, com- provided they suspend their natural inclimittee discussion of investment proposals nation to reward success and punish fail-influences the direction and nature of ure. The sometimes deep-rooted corporate future sta≠ initiatives. E≠ective portfolio instinct to pursue winners and avoid losers management requires striking a balance pushes portfolios toward fundamentally between respect for the ultimate authority risky momentum-driven strategies and of the investment committee and delega- away from potentially profitable contrarian University President Richard C. Levin ’74 ph.d. tion of reasonable responsibility to the opportunities. The most e≠ective invest- (right), with Investment Committee Chair Douglas investment sta≠. ment committee members understand the A. Warner, iii ’68 (left) and Chief Investment Committee members often provide responsibility to oversee the investment O∞cer David F. Swensen ’80 ph.d.

Investment Committee Chairmen firm’s history. He was managing partner from 1968 to 1983 and resumed his general partnership at that time, a role he held until he passed away in 1988. Madden was a trustee of The Boys’ Club of New York for over thirty-five years. He also served on the boards of The New York Community Trust, the James Foundation, the Maine Community Foundation, the Packer Collegiate Institute, the Visiting Nurse Association of Brooklyn, and the Brooklyn Hospital. Madden was a generous sup-porter of residential colleges at Yale, and the endowment for the Berkeley College Mastership is named in his honor.

John Madden Harold Woodsum Harold Edward Woodsum, Jr. (1987-1988) John Beckwith Madden (1975-1987) Harold Edward Woodsum, Jr. graduated six years at White & Case in New York John Beckwith Madden graduated from from Yale College in 1953. During his time City, in 1965 Woodsum left to co-found Yale College in 1941. During his time at at Yale, he majored in history and was a the Portland, Maine law firm Drummond Yale, he was a member of the varsity wrest- star wide receiver for the Yale football Woodsum and remained a partner in the ling team. After graduating, he served in team. Woodsum’s record of fifteen career firm for twenty-three years. In 1988, at the Army during World War ii, rising to touchdown receptions, which he set in the request of President Benno Schmidt, the rank of captain. Madden joined the three years of play, stood for twenty-seven Woodsum took a leave of absence and credit department of Brown Brothers years. Even today, he is tied for fourth on came back to Yale to take on the role of Harriman in 1946 and was made a general the all-time list. He went on to obtain a Director of Athletics, a position he held partner in 1955, one of the youngest in the Bachelor of Laws from Yale in 1958. After until 1994. In addition to this service to the Investment Committee (continued) University, Woodsum has donated gener- ship of the cfa Institute and as an associously to Yale athletics. An advocate of envi- ate editor of The Journal of Portfolio ronmental concerns, Woodsum joined the Management and The Financial Analysts board of directors of the National Audubon Journal. He authored sixteen books on Society in 1981 and became chairman of business and finance, including the classic the board in 1988. Woodsum also served as Winning the Loser’s Game. Ellis held faculty a trustee and chairman of the University of appointments at Harvard Business School, New England. the Yale School of Management, and the Investment Workshop at Princeton. Ellis currently serves as the managing partner of The Partners of ’63, a pro bono partnership of Harvard Business School classmates and friends who support entrepreneurial, change-oriented ventures in education, particularly those focused on underprivi-leged children. Ellis has been a generous supporter of Yale facilities, providing fund-Richard Franke ing for the new School of Management campus, and of Yale faculty positions. role he held until 1996. Franke is founding chairman and director emeritus of the Chicago Humanities Festival, life trustee of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, and founder of the University of Chicago Franke Institute for the Humanities. He received the National Humanities Medal in 1997. Franke has been a generous sup-Joseph Williams porter of Yale University’s Sterling Memorial Library, the Graduate School of Joseph H. Williams (1988-1989) Arts and Sciences, and the Whitney Joseph H. Williams graduated from Yale Humanities Center.

College in 1956. During his time at Yale, Williams was a member of the Army rotc and, after graduation, went to Fort Sill, Oklahoma to complete his training. He joined Williams Brothers, his family’s busi-ness, in 1959 and in 1968 became executive vice president. Williams was elected a member of the board in 1969 and named Douglas Warner president and chief operating o∞cer in 1971. He succeeded his cousin as chief Douglas A. Warner, iii (2008-present) executive o∞cer in 1979, a role he kept During his thirty-three-year career in until his retirement in 1993. Williams has banking and financial services, Douglas served on the boards of The Williams A. Warner, iii rose to lead J.P. Morgan Companies, Orvis, aea Investors, Amer-Chase & Co., having begun his career at ican Express, and Prudential Insurance.

J.P. Morgan upon graduating from Yale He is also former chairman of the Federal College in 1968. In 1995, he was named Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Williams the youngest chief executive o∞cer in J.P. has been a generous supporter of Yale Morgan’s history and was chairman and University’s School of Forestry & Environ- Charles Ellis chief executive o∞cer until J.P. Morgan mental Studies.

Charles D. Ellis (1999-2008) merged with Chase Manhattan in 2000.

Following the merger, Warner served as Richard J. Franke (1989-1999) Charles D. Ellis graduated from Yale Col- chairman of the board of the combined Richard J. Franke graduated from Yale lege in 1959 before going on to Harvard enterprise until his retirement in 2001. College in 1953. After graduation, he served Business School to earn an m.b.a. and Since 1998 he has been chairman of the in the Army as an artillery o∞cer. Follow- New York University to complete a ph.d. board of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer ing two years in the Army as a First Lieu- His professional career centered on three Center. He is a director of Motorola and tenant, Franke went to Harvard Business decades with Greenwich Associates, the General Electric. Warner has been a gener-School. He became vice president of The international strategy consulting firm he ous supporter of Yale facilities, providing John Nuveen Company in 1965 and rose founded and led. An avid participant in the funding for the Warner House, and of to become chief executive o∞cer in 1974, a study of finance, he served in the leader- Yale faculty positions.

Sources Photo Credits Financial and Investment Information Pages 10-14 Front cover: Educational institution asset allocations and Steve Dunwell Photography, Inc., Boston Educational institution asset allocations and returns from Cambridge Associates. returns from Cambridge Associates. Page 25: Page 25: Photographer: Chip Somodevilla.

Much of the material in this publication is Quotation from President’s Executive Order Collection: Getty Images News drawn from memoranda produced by the creating the President’s Economic Recovery Investments O∞ce for the Yale Corporation Other photographs: Advisory Board (perab) from Executive Investment Committee. Other material comes Michael Marsland, Yale O∞ce of Public Order 13501 of February 6, 2009. from Yale’s financial records, Reports of the A≠airs and Communications Treasurer, and Reports of the President. files/microsites/perab-exec-order.pdf Design Pages 9, 29-30 Strong Cohen/D. Pucillo The sections on Manager Characteristics and Investment Committee draw on David Swensen’s Pioneering Portfolio Management (Simon and Schuster, 2009).

Stone inscription from Berkeley College North, in honor of Henry Parks Wright, first Dean of Yale College. To commemorate Dean Wright’s twenty-five-year tenure, an Old Campus freshman residence (now known as Lanman-Wright Hall) was named for him in 1909.