长期投资与企业治理

2006 · 演讲 · 原文约 1625 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

1.

1.

长期投资与企业治理 约翰·C·博格尔 先锋集团创始人兼前首席执行官 2006 年 6 月 7 日 于加拿大养老金管理国际中心 多伦多

Long Horizon Investing and Corporate Governance John C. Bogle Founder and Former CEO, The Vanguard Group at the International Centre for Pension Management Toronto, Canada June 7, 2006 2.

资本家灵魂之战

所有者资本主义——所有者社会

“病态变异”

经理人资本主义——代理人社会

投资价值进阶

受托人资本主义——受托人社会

美国权益类证券前 15 大持有者 3.

价值(百万美元) 占全部美国权益类证券累计份额(%) 共同基金份额(%)

1 富达投资 575079 4.2% 83%

2 巴克莱全球投资者 537824 8.2 7

3 道富环球顾问 447039 11.5 10

4 资本集团 414268 14.5 66

5 先锋集团 297007 16.7 97

6 安盛集团 261385 18.6 10

7 惠灵顿管理公司 233601 20.3 45

8 北方信托 232462 22.0 3

9 梅隆金融公司 198611 23.5 15

10 摩根大通资产管理 168059 24.7 5

11 花旗集团 168039 26.0 27

12 T. Rowe Price 集团 153658 27.1 65

13 莱格梅森 138112 28.1 34

14 TIAA-CREF 124878 29.0 4

15 安盛罗素投资 115031 29.9 48

前 25 大:5.0 万亿美元 37%

前 100 大:7.8 万亿美元 57%

前 300 大:8.4 万亿美元 62%

美国权益类证券前 12 大公共基金持有者 4.

The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism OWNERS’ Capitalism – Ownership Society “Pathological Mutation” MANAGERS’ Capitalism – Agency Society Advance in Investment Values TRUSTEES’ Capitalism – Fiduciary Society 15 Largest Holders of U.S. Equities 3. Value Cum. Share of % in (mil) All U.S. Equities Mutual Funds 1 Fidelity Investments $575,079 4.2% 83% 2 Barclays Global Investors 537,824 8.2 7 3 State Street Global Advisors 447,039 11.5 10 4 Capital Group Cos. 414,268 14.5 66 5 Vanguard Group 297,007 16.7 97 6 AXA Group 261,385 18.6 10 7 Wellington Mgmt Co. 233,601 20.3 45 8 Northern Trust 232,462 22.0 3 9 Mellon Financial Corp. 198,611 23.5 15 10 J.P. Morgan Asset Mgmt 168,059 24.7 5 11 Citigroup 168,039 26.0 27 12 T. Rowe Price Group 153,658 27.1 65 13 Legg Mason 138,112 28.1 34 14 TIAA-CREF 124,878 29.0 4 15 Amvescap 115,031 29.9 48 25 Largest: $5.0 tril 37% 100 Largest: 7.8 57% 300 Largest: 8.4 62% 12 Largest Public Fund Holders of U.S. Equities 4.

价值总体排名(百万美元):第 37 名 加州公共雇员退休基金 608.75 亿美元;第 46 名 纽约州教师退休基金 484.84 亿美元;第 48 名 德克萨斯州教师退休基金 475.62 亿美元;第 49 名 纽约州公共退休基金 443.74 亿美元;第 51 名 佛罗里达州行政委员会 416.64 亿美元;第 57 名 新泽西州投资部 353.82 亿美元;第 68 名 俄亥俄州公共雇员退休基金 267.92 亿美元;第 71 名 威斯康星州投资委员会 253.55 亿美元;第 76 名 密歇根州退休基金 241.67 亿美元;第 79 名 俄亥俄州教师退休基金 230.93 亿美元;第 84 名 加州教师退休基金 193.12 亿美元;第 96 名 宾夕法尼亚州公立学校雇员退休基金 156.61 亿美元。合计:4177 亿美元,占美国股票比例:3%。

Value Overall Rank (mil) 37 California Public Employees' Retirement System $60,875 46 New York State Teachers' Retirement System 48,484 48 Teacher Retirement System of Texas 47,562 49 New York State Common Retirement Fund 44,374 51 Florida State Board of Administration 41,664 57 New Jersey Division of Investment 35,382 68 Ohio Public Employees' Retirement System 26,792 71 State of Wisconsin Investment Board 25,355 76 Michigan Retirement Systems 24,167 79 State Teachers' Retirement System of Ohio 23,093 84 California State Teachers' Retirement System 19,312 96 Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement 15,661 Total: $417.7b Share of U.S. Stocks: 3% 5.

听听亚当·斯密怎么说:“公司的董事们,作为他人钱财而非自己钱财的管理者,很难指望他们能像合伙企业的合伙人看管自家钱财那样,抱有同样焦虑的警觉。就像富人家的管家,他们很容易就给自己开了绿灯。疏忽与挥霍,必然盛行。”

Hear Adam Smith “It cannot be well expected that the directors of companies, being the managers rather of other people’s money than of their own, should watch over it with the same anxious vigilance with which partners in a copartnery frequently watch over their own. Like the stewards of a rich man, they very easily give themselves a dispensation. Negligence and profusion must always prevail.”

6.

6.

原件此处是表格,PDF 抽取时列结构已丢失,下面只剩按列读出的数字,行列对应关系无法还原。核对数据请打开来源正文。

平均股票型基金周转率 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 股票型基金总周转率(含指数基金)不含指数基金 2001 年:76% 79% 2005 年:54% 61%

Average Equity Fund Turnover 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Aggregate Equity Fund Turnover w/ Index Funds w/o Index Funds 2001: 76% 79% 2005: 54% 61% 7.

沃伦·巴菲特谈价值与价格:“内在价值是企业在剩余存续期内可从其业务中提取的现金的折现值……当股票临时跑赢或跑输企业本身时,少数股东——无论是卖方还是买方——会以与其交易方为代价获得超额收益。但长期来看,伯克希尔股东的总收益必然与公司自身的经营收益持平。”

Warren Buffett on Value vs. Price “Intrinsic value is the discounted value of the cash that can be taken out of the business during its remaining life . . . When the stock temporarily over-performs or under-performs the business, a limited number of shareholders—either sellers or buyers—receive out-sized benefits at the expense of those they trade with. But over time, the aggregate gains made by Berkshire shareholders must of necessity match the business gains of the company.”

8.

8.

投资组合周转率与年化回报率 942 只股票型基金 (晨星数据,截至 2005 年 2 月的 10 年) 净交易成本 税前风险 风险调整后 税后风险调整后 周转率 费用比率 回报率 (标准差) 税前回报率 回报率

Portfolio Turnover vs. Annual Returns 942 Equity Funds (Morningstar Data for 10 Years Ended 2/2005) Net Trans. Exp. Pre-Tax Risk Risk-Adj Risk-Adj Turnover Costs Ratio Return (SD) PT Ret. AT Ret.

原件此处是表格,PDF 抽取时列结构已丢失,下面只剩按列读出的数字,行列对应关系无法还原。核对数据请打开来源正文。

1Q 13% 0.1% 1.0% 11.5% 16% 11.6% 10.1% 2Q 40 0.4 1.1 11.1 17 10.9 9.0 3Q 75 0.7 1.3 10.1 19 9.5 7.5 4Q 165 1.5 1.3 9.8 21 8.9 6.5 Avg 73% 0.7% 1.2% 10.6% 18% 10.3% 8.3% 9.

1Q 13% 0.1% 1.0% 11.5% 16% 11.6% 10.1% 2Q 40 0.4 1.1 11.1 17 10.9 9.0 3Q 75 0.7 1.3 10.1 19 9.5 7.5 4Q 165 1.5 1.3 9.8 21 8.9 6.5 Avg 73% 0.7% 1.2% 10.6% 18% 10.3% 8.3% 9.

投资组合换手率 vs 年化回报率(晨星盒) 高换手率与低换手率四分位之间的风险调整后税后回报率差距 全部国内股票型基金:10.1% - 6.5% = 3.6% 混合型 成长型 价值型 大盘股 2.0% 1.4% 2.1% 中盘股 3.7% 2.7% 4.4% 小盘股 1.3% 4.0% 1.9%

Portfolio Turnover vs. Annual Returns (Morningstar Boxes) Spread in Risk-Adjusted After-Tax Returns Between High and Low Turnover Quartiles All Domestic Equity Funds: 10.1% - 6.5% = 3.6% Blend Growth Value Large Cap 2.0% 1.4% 2.1% Mid Cap 3.7 2.7 4.4 Small Cap 1.3 4.0 1.9 10.

低周转率与高周转率四分组中每 1 美元的税后利润

12 美元

第一季度

10.08 美元

10 美元

第四季度

8 美元

6 美元

3.83 美元

4 美元

2 美元

1.62 美元

0.88 美元

0 过去 10 年 25 年(预测)

After-tax Profit on $1 in Low Turnover and High Turnover Quartiles $12 1Q $10.08 $10 4Q $8 $6 $3.83 $4 $2 $1.62 $0.88 $0 Past 10 years 25 years (Projected) 11.

参与公司治理问题——私人投资经理的参与情况

议题编号 由管理方反对的代理决议提出者 数量

0 关于《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》的国会证词 0

0 敦促美国财务会计准则委员会要求股票期权费用化 0

0 机构所有者的权利与责任 1

0 对美国证券交易委员会高管薪酬公告的评论 1*

0 对美国证券交易委员会董事提名人选公告的评论 0**

*由工会控制的基金集团提交。**共 17,000 份公众回复。没有一家大型公司主张简化渠道。

Participation in Governance Issues by Private Investment Managers Issue Number Sponsor of proxy resolution opposed by management. 0 Congressional testimony on Sarbanes-Oxley. 0 Urging FASB to require expensing of stock options. 0 Rights and responsibilities of institutional owners. 1 Comments on SEC executive compensation release. 1* Comments on SEC release on director nomination. 0** *Made by fund group controlled by labor union. **17,000 public responses. No major firm sought easier access.

12.

12.

共同承担指数基金的责任

萨莫拉姆 & 怀尔德史密斯

许多养老金基金现在以指数追踪为核心持仓,而低利润率和规模经济意味着这一市场只有少数几家大型基金管理公司提供服务。这种集中化现象为规模最大的养老金基金创造了一个重要契机——它们可以要求这些公司共同出资组建常设团队,专门通过代表所有客户进行精心针对性的股东积极行动,来提升长期市场回报。规模最大的养老金基金将在这些团队的治理中发挥关键作用……团队由那些已经代表长期投资者参与相关事务的人员组成。这些团队将重点关注一系列关键议题和/或关键领域,在这些领域,破坏价值的市场失灵已经明显存在或很可能发生。可以采取持续性或间歇性的干预措施。团队成员将大幅摆脱当前公司汇报体系中的营销与报告压力,以及利益冲突。这将为与公司建立更健康、也更果断(在必要时)的关系创造条件。这也可能是一种成本效益更高的解决方案。

Collectively Addressing the Responsibilities of Index Funds Thamotheram and Wildsmith Many pension funds now have an index-tracking core, and low margins and economies of scale mean that this market is served by only a few large fund management firms. This concentration creates an important opportunity for the largest pension funds to require these firms to jointly fund permanent teams that focus on enhancing long-term market returns through carefully targeted shareholder activism undertaken on behalf of all their clients. The largest pension funds would play a key role in the governance of these teams . . . staffed by those already engaging on behalf of long-term investors. The teams would focus on a combination of key issues and/or key sectors where value-destroying market failure is evident or likely. Ongoing or intermittent interventions would be possible. The staff would be significantly freed from the marketing and reporting pressures and also the conflicts of interest in their current corporate reporting lines. This would create the context for both healthier, but also more assertive (when needed), relationships with corporations. It is also likely to be a more cost effective solution.

13.

13.

指数型股票基金资产占比:16%、15.0%、12.1%、12%、8.6%、8%、4%、2.0%、0.2%、0%、14。

Indexed Share of Equity Fund Assets 16% 15.0% 12.1% 12% 8.6% 8% 4% 2.0% 0.2% 0% 14.

原件此处是表格,PDF 抽取时列结构已丢失,下面只剩按列读出的数字,行列对应关系无法还原。核对数据请打开来源正文。

股指基金占股票型基金资产比例 16% 15.0% 开放式基金 12.1% 12% 交易型开放式指数基金 8.6% 8% 4% 2.0% 0.2% 0% 15

Indexed Share of Equity Fund Assets 16% 15.0% Open-end funds 12.1% 12% ETFs 8.6% 8% 4% 2.0% 0.2% 0% 15.

原件此处是表格,PDF 抽取时列结构已丢失,下面只剩按列读出的数字,行列对应关系无法还原。核对数据请打开来源正文。

指数基金净现金流(十亿美元) 100 开放基金 80 ETF 60 40 20 0 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 开放基金份额 95% 82% 29% 31% 16

Index Fund Net Cash Flow (bil) $100 Open-end funds $80 ETFs $60 $40 $20 $0 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 M 5 ar -0 6 Open End Fund Share 95% 82% 29% 31% 16.

觉醒之希望 1. 个人投资者的经济教育。2. 基金经理重组。

Hopes for an Awakening 1. Individual investors’ economic education. 2. Fund manager restructuring.

3. 报告代理投票似乎提高了参与度。4. 焦点转变——从盈利转向现金。5. 精明分析师的回归。6. 聚焦股息——为 LH 股东提高股息。7. 关注税收——即使对免税投资者也不例外。8. 关注渠道——对 LH 股东开放。9. 分离董事长与首席执行官的角色。10. 为董事提供信息。

3. Reporting proxy votes seems to raise participation. 4. Change in focus—earnings to cash. 5. The return of the astute analyst. 6. Focus on dividends—raise for LH owners. 7. Focus on taxes—even for tax-exempt investors. 8. Focus on access—open for LH owners. 9. Separating chairman and CEO roles. 10. Information for Directors.

17.

17.

沃伦·巴菲特谈短期主义(1986 年)(纽交所日均成交量:1.41 亿股)既然投机漩涡已经吞噬了企业,我们还能做些什么?让政府对持有不满一年的股票或衍生工具出售所得利润征收 100% 的税。这项税适用于所有人,包括养老金基金和其他通常免税的实体。华尔街的诸多讽刺之一便是,这些本应拥有最长远投资视角的基金,却在华尔街的竞争赛跑中被改造成了最投机的一群玩家。100% 税的一个结果将是确定的:如今被用于在几分钟、几天或几周内产生最大回报的投资决策的大量脑力和精力,会立刻转向那些承诺带来最大长期回报的决策。

Warren Buffett on Short-Termism (1986) (Daily volume on NYSE: 141m) What can be done, now that the whirlpool of speculation has engulfed enterprise? Let the government impose a 100 percent tax on any profits derived from the sale of stocks or derivative instruments that the holder has owned for less than a year. Any apply the tax to everyone, including pension funds and other entities that normally are not taxed. It’s one of Wall Street’s many ironies that such funds, which should have the longest investment perspective, have been transformed by the competitive race on Wall Street into some of the most speculative players around. One result of a 100 percent tax would be certain: the substantial brain power and energy now applied to the making of investment decisions that will produce the greatest rewards in a few minutes, days or weeks would be instantly reoriented to decisions promising the greatest long-term rewards.

18.

18.

凯雷集团董事长卢·格斯特纳谈短期主义(纽约证交所日交易量:16 亿股)。问题所在:在非公开场景下,你就能消除当前主导市场的、对季度业绩那种功能失调的短期关注……你拥有更长的时间框架,并且股东与管理层直接形成合力,来修复公司、随着时间推移构建价值,并对变革保持耐心。

Carlyle Group chairman Lou Gerstner on Short-Termism (Daily volume on NYSE: 1.6b) The Problem: In a private setting, you eliminate the dysfunctional short-term focus on quarterly results that dominates the market today . . . you have a longer time frame, and you have a direct alignment of the shareholders with the management to fix the company, to build value over time, and to be patient with the changes.

一个解决方案:为了让大型投资者从【关注】长期中受益,我建议我们应对长期投资者和短期投资者的收益实行不同的税率。在我们找到办法让【公开上市公司的】大型投资者着眼于长期业绩之前,我们正在做的所有其他事情都不会改变其对短期结果的执迷。

A Solution: To have large investors benefit from [focusing on] the long term, I propose that we should tax gains differently for long-term investors than for short-term investors. Until we figure out a way to get [large investors in public companies] to deal with long-term performance, then all of the other things we’re doing will not change the preoccupation with short-term results.

16.

16.

觉醒的希望 1. 散户投资者的经济学教育 2. 基金经理的重组

Hopes for an Awakening 1. Individual investors’ economic education. 2. Fund manager restructuring.

3. 报告代理投票似乎提高了参与度。4. 关注点转变——从利润到现金。5. 精明分析师的回归。6. 关注股息——为 LH 持有者提高股息。7. 关注税收——即便对免税投资者也是如此。8. 关注准入——对 LH 持有者开放。9. 分离董事长和首席执行官的角色。10. 为董事提供信息。

3. Reporting proxy votes seems to raise participation. 4. Change in focus—earnings to cash. 5. The return of the astute analyst. 6. Focus on dividends—raise for LH owners. 7. Focus on taxes—even for tax-exempt investors. 8. Focus on access—open for LH owners. 9. Separating chairman and CEO roles. 10. Information for Directors.

19.

19.

罗伯特·蒙克斯《没有所有者的资本主义终将失败》:“在公司治理中,政府显然需要介入,以确保国家公民被忽视的股票所有权权益得到保障。所需要的是明确且一贯执行的公共政策,该政策赋予所有所有者的代表——中介投资机构及其基金经理——以清晰的受托义务,要求他们对其投资组合账户中的公司积极参与;同时,让他们有信心,在履行此义务时,不会因此而在竞争或声誉上处于相对于同行的劣势。最重要的是,必须毫不含糊地表明,政府有意愿且有执行力,以公平的方式执行受托人和信托法律,其唯一目的和专属利益在于其受益人的利益——而这对大多数公民来说,正是其养老金基金的主要部分。”

Robert Monks “Capitalism Without Owners Will Fail” “Government involvement is clearly needed in corporate governance to guarantee the nation’s citizens the neglected rights of ownership of their stocks. What is needed is a clear and consistently enforced public policy that gives all owners’ representatives, the intermediary investment institutions and their fund managers, the clear fiduciary requirement to be active with respect to companies held in their portfolio accounts, and the confidence that they will not be placed at a competitive or reputational disadvantage with their competitors by complying. Above all else, it must be unmistakable that government intends, and is capable of enforcing, the trustee and fiduciary laws for the sole purpose and exclusive benefit of their beneficiaries’ interests—the great part of the funded pensions of most citizens—in an even-handed way.”

激进分子的言论?第二十则

Words of a Radical? 20.

本杰明·格雷厄姆论股东积极主义(1949)1. 股东完全是一群废物,缺乏智识与觉悟,投票时如同羊群一般盲从。

Benjamin Graham on Shareholder Activism (1949) 1. Shareholders are a complete washout, lacking intelligence and awareness, and voting in sheep-like fashion.

2. 如果存在低效或不诚信的管理层,“全国最大企业的所有者们必须采取明智的行动。”

2. If inefficient or dishonest managements exist, “the owners of the nation’s largest businesses must take intelligent action.”

行动一:大股东必须认识到变革的必要性。

Action 1: Substantial shareholders must recognize the need for change.

行动二:其他股东应当权衡两方面的论据。

Action 2: Other shareholders should consider arguments on both sides.

第三步:股东聘请外部商业工程师(费用由公司承担)。

Action 3: Shareholders call in outside business engineers (at a cost borne by the company).

行动四:金融机构(如纽约证券交易所、CFA 协会)及大型投资管理机构支持股东诉求。

Action 4: Financial agencies (i.e. NYSE, CFA Inst.) and large investment managers support shareholder demands.

行动五:挑选一位或多位经验丰富的董事,由他们向股东提交一份独立的年度报告。

Action 5: Select one or more experienced directors who provide a separate annual report to stockholders.