品格共同体

2008 · 演讲 · 原文约 1825 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

品格共同体

——先锋集团创始人兼前首席执行官约翰·C·博格尔在获得费城社区学院颁发的 2008 年度邦内尔奖时的致辞,该奖项表彰他“体现了创新、远见和决断力的理想”

在第二届年度路径早餐会上的演讲

2008 年 12 月 16 日

感谢迈克尔·纳特市长,感谢您热情洋溢、慷慨至极的介绍,感谢您对费城社区学院的支持,也感谢您百忙之中拨冗出席。我知道,在您作为大城市市长承担着艰巨职责、又面临严峻经济环境的此刻,今天又是忙碌的一天。

A Community of Character Remarks by John C. Bogle Founder and former Chief Executive, The Vanguard Group On receiving the 2008 Bonnell Award From the Community College of Philadelphia for “Embodying the Ideals of Innovation, Vision, and Determination” nd At the 2 Annual Pathways Breakfast December 16, 2008 Thank you, Mayor Michael Nutter for that glowing and infinitely generous introduction, for your support of the Community College of Philadelphia, and for honoring us with your presence in what I’m sure is yet another busy day as you fulfill your awesome responsibilities as a big-city mayor in a tough economic environment.

我深感荣幸能接受我们社区大学颁发的博内尔奖,即便我担心你们在创新者和远见者方面对我评价过高了。(也许你们对我那"决心"的判断倒是没错!)在座的多数人都知道,阿伦·T·博内尔博士是这所学院的创始校长,从 1965 年学院成立到 1983 年退休,他一直担任领导。博内尔博士今天上午也来到现场,请大家和我一起,感谢他对这所卓越学府的开创性领导。也感谢斯蒂芬·柯蒂斯博士,继续传承这份领导力。

I’m deeply honored to accept the Bonnell Award from our Community College even as I fear you over-rate me in terms of my credentials as an innovator and a visionary. (Perhaps you’re right about the determination!) As most of you in this audience know, Dr. Allan T. Bonnell was the founding president of the college, and served as its leader from its inception in 1965 until retiring from that post in 1983. Dr. Bonnell is with us this morning, and I ask you to join me in recognizing his pioneering leadership of this great institution. Thank you, too, Dr. Stephen Curtis for continuing that leadership.

在努力了解中央学院(CCP)的工作时,我偶然读到你们《Pathways》杂志的 2008 年夏季刊。从中得知,我是第二位获得博内尔奖的人。诸位或许还记得,第一位是一年前获奖的比尔·科斯比。如今,我们二人共同向当今美国所代表的多样性(其效力前所未有)致敬——站在他那巨大的身影下,我深感自豪。

In my effort to understand the work of CCP, I came upon the Summer 2008 issue of your Pathways magazine. There, I learned that I am but the second person to receive the Bonnell award. The first, as some of you may recall, was Bill Cosby, whom you honored a year ago. As we now pair up in a tribute to the diversity that America represents today—more effectively than ever before—I’m enormously proud to stand in his giant shadow.

在同一期《路径》中,我还读到一篇关于传奇人物小威廉·T·科尔曼先生(Esq.)的文章。他是民权先驱,也是第一位进入《哈佛法律评论》董事会、第一位担任美国最高法院大法官助理、第一位在总统内阁任职的非裔美国人。多年来我与比尔·科尔曼只有些许交集,但对他极为敬佩。他与我一样坚信教育的重要性,以及社区大学的巨大价值。用他的话来说,社区大学“让人们能够学习新知识、做不同的事……这是美国维持(世界)领导地位所必需的发展。”毫无疑问,威廉·科尔曼说得对。

In that same Pathways issue, I also read the article about the legendary William T. Coleman, Jr., Esq., the civil rights pioneer who was the first black to serve on the board of the Harvard Law Review, to clerk for a Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, and to serve in the cabinet of a President of the United States. I’ve known Bill Coleman just a bit over the years, but with great admiration. He shares my belief in the importance of education and the great value of community colleges that, in his words, “allow people to get new learning and do different things . . . a necessary development if the United States is going to continue its position of (world) leadership.” And of course, William Coleman is right.

科尔曼是如何克服早年生活中盛行的种族偏见所制造的显而易见的障碍的?他告诉我们:“生活中总有障碍。这是你必须面对的挑战之一。关键在于能否把握住机会。”确实如此,这也正是 CCP 试图为超过 50 万曾经走进其大门学习和钻研的男女学员所做的事情——帮助他们更好地克服生活中所遭遇的障碍。上周我会见了其中四位学员——卡尔、海蒂、厄文和莎伦——交谈之后,他们背景的多样性以及克服障碍、把握人生挑战之路上呈现的机遇的那份专注决心,给我留下了深刻印象。

How did Coleman overcome the obvious obstacles created by the racial intolerance that was so prevalent in our society during his early life? He tells us; “There are always obstacles in life. That’s one of the challenges you have. It’s just a matter of being able to take advantage of opportunities.” And so it is, and that’s what CCP is trying to do for the 500,000-plus men and women who have come through its doors to study and to learn, to better overcome the obstacles they have faced in their lives. Last week I visited with four of those students—Carl, Heidi, Ervan and Sharon—and came away from the conversation impressed with the diversity of their backgrounds and the single-mindedness of their determination to overcome those obstacles, and to take advantage of the opportunities that are presented along the challenging pathway of life.

“人人生而平等” 与这四位杰出学生的会面,让我想起了自己成年后大部分时间里一直深怀的忧虑——我们这个国家未能充分提供机会平等,这一忧虑在我新书《够了:金钱、商业与生活的真正衡量标准》中刚刚做过阐述。以下是我理念的精髓:所有被命运眷顾、被教育滋养、被决心驱动的人,都能为自己的好运感到自豪。但即使我们在美国文明的巨大恩惠中繁荣发展,也必须提醒自己:今天,这些恩惠只有极小一部分国民能够分享,而正如我们的《独立宣言》所保证的那样,“人人生而平等”——不平等——在家庭、教育,甚至机会方面——从我们出生的那一刻起就已经开始了。

“All Men Are Created Equal” My visit with these four exceptional students reminded me of the deep concerns that I’ve held for most of my adult life about our nation’s failure to adequately provide equality of opportunity, most recently articulated in my new book, Enough. True Measures of Money, Business, and Life. Here is the essence of my philosophy: All of us who have been favored by fate, enriched by education, and driven by determination can feel proud of our good fortune. But even as we thrive on the great benefits of our American civilization, we must remind ourselves that today these benefits are shared by far too small a portion of our citizenry, while, as our Declaration of Independence assures us, “all men are created equal,” inequality—in family, in education, and, yes, even in opportunity—begins at the very moment of our birth.

但美利坚合众国的宪法要求我们做得更好。“我们合众国人民”被要求“组成一个更完善的联邦,树立正义,保障国内安宁……促进公共福利,并使我们自己和后代得享自由的恩赐。”这些并非空话,它们代表了我们这个时代的挑战:为每一位不论年龄、种族、血统、希望改善自身命运的公民打开机会之门。教育和职业培训,正是打开并最终推开这些大门的关键。

But the Constitution of the United States of America demands something better. “We the People” are enjoined “to form a more perfect Union, to establish Justice for all; to insure domestic Tranquility . . . to promote the general Welfare, and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” These are not mere words; they represent the challenge of our age: to open the doors of opportunity to any citizen of any age, of any race, and of any heritage who wishes to improve his or her lot in life. Education and career training are the keys to unlocking, and then opening, those doors.

亚伯拉罕·林肯与西奥多·罗斯福 这些理念绝非我一人独有。事实上,一个半世纪前,我们最伟大的总统之一曾优美地阐述过它们;一个世纪前,另一位总统又再次重申。首先听听亚伯拉罕·林肯的话:“我认为,只要人存在,他就有责任不仅改善自身的处境,而且帮助促进人类的进步……劳动先于资本,并独立于资本。既然资本只是劳动的果实,那么劳动就优于资本,理应得到更高的重视。”然而,林肯又补充道:“让无家可归者不要拆毁他人的房屋,而要勤奋工作,为自己建造一所房屋,这样身教胜于言教,确保他自己的房子安然无恙。”

Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt These ideals are hardly mine alone. In fact, a century and a half ago, they were beautifully expressed by one of our greatest presidents, and restated a century ago by another. First hear Abraham Lincoln: “ I hold that while man exists it is his duty to improve not only his own condition, but to assist in ameliorating mankind . . . Labor is prior to, and independent of capital. Since capital is only the fruit of labor, labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.” Yet, Lincoln added, “Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another, but let him work diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe.”

大约 100 年前,西奥多·罗斯福在 1910 年那篇关于“新国家主义”的著名演讲中引用了林肯的话,他指出:“如果林肯的这番话是我原创的,那么我肯定会比现在更被强烈地指责为共产主义煽动者。”罗斯福是这样表述的:“那些拥有超过其应得之人,与那些应得超过其所拥有之人,两者之间斗争的本质,在于均等机会、摧毁特权,并赋予每个个体的生命与公民身份对其自身及社会共同体的最高价值。”

Almost 100 years ago, Theodore Roosevelt quoted Lincoln’s words in his remarkable 1910 speech on “The New Nationalism,” noting that “if Lincoln’s remarks were original with me, I should be even more strongly denounced as a Communist agitator than I shall be anyhow.” Roosevelt put it this way, “The essence of the struggle between the men who possess more than they have earned and the men who have earned more than they possess is to equalize opportunity, destroy privilege, and give to the life and citizenship of every individual the highest possible value both to himself and to the commonwealth.

“当我们实现所有公民机会的实际平等时,”他继续说道,“将产生两个重大成果。第一,每个人都将获得公平的机会,充分发挥自己的潜能;凭借自身能力,不受自身特殊特权的帮助,也不受他人特殊特权的阻碍,达到能力所能企及的最高点,为自己和家人切实获得其应得的回报。第二,机会平等意味着国家将从每个公民那里获得其所能提供的最高水平的服务。”在我看来,这番话精准地概括了费城社区学院的全部宗旨。

“Practical equality of opportunity for all citizens, when we achieve it,” he continued, “will have two great results. First, every man will have a fair chance to make of himself all that in him lies; to reach the highest point to which his capacities, unassisted by special privilege of his own and unhampered by the special privilege of others, can carry him, and to get for himself and his family substantially what he has earned. Second, equality of opportunity means that the commonwealth will get from every citizen the highest service of which he is capable.” It seems to me that these words sum up precisely what the Community College of Philadelphia is all about.

“但是,”罗斯福接着说道,“任何人都不应获得一美元,除非这一美元是公平赚来的。每一美元的收入,都应该代表一美元价值的服务——不是股票的投机,而是服务的付出。(着重号为原文所加。)因此,我主张对大额财富征收累进所得税,并对大额遗产征收累进遗产税……税率随遗产规模的增大而迅速提高。”鉴于西奥多·罗斯福对累进税的坚定信念,我感到既好笑又失望的是,当当选总统巴拉克·奥巴马支持那些根植于——没错——林肯和罗斯福的共和党政策时,却被阴险地描述为“社会主义者”,其目标是“分配财富”,这呼应了罗斯福当年期望自己被称作共产主义者的情景。

“But,” Roosevelt continued, “No man should receive a dollar unless that dollar has been fairly earned. Every dollar received should represent a dollar’s worth of service rendered—not gambling in stocks, but service rendered. (Italics added.) Therefore, I believe in a graduated income tax on big fortunes, and a graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes . . . increasing rapidly in amount with the size of the estate.” Given Theodore Roosevelt’s commitment to progressive taxation, I find myself both amused and disappointed that when President-elect Barack Obama endorsed policies rooted in, yes, the Republican party of Lincoln and Roosevelt, he was described darkly as a “socialist” whose goal was to “spread the wealth,” echoing Roosevelt’s expectation of being called a Communist all those years ago.

当前的金融危机,其重要诱因当然是股票上的赌博——更不用说现代在债券和所谓衍生品上的赌博了。这种用他人钱财进行的赌博,为华尔街的少数人创造了巨额财富,实质上,在市场泡沫期间,我们国家的“宇宙主宰”们只顾着满足自己狭隘的利益。但是,我们现在知道,当泡沫破裂(它总是会破裂)时,华尔街对构成我们国家脊梁的美国普通民众造成了难以估量的伤害。许多年前,罗斯福早就预见到了这一结果:“对不义敛财缺乏有效的国家约束,往往催生出一小撮巨富且经济势力强大的阶层,其主要目标是保持并扩大自己的权力……但我们不会嫉妒任何人凭借自己的能力和智慧、在充分顾及同胞福祉的前提下赚得的财富……”

The Present Financial Crisis The present financial crisis, of course was precipitated importantly by gambling in stocks—to say nothing of the modern-day gambling in bonds and so-called derivatives. This gambling with other people’s money created enormous wealth for the few of Wall Street as, in essence, our nation’s “masters of the universe” served their own parochial interests during the market bubble. But, as we now know, when the bubble burst (as it always does) Wall Street inflicted an incredible disservice to the real people of Main Street, the backbone of our nation. All those years ago, Roosevelt clearly anticipated this outcome: “The absence of effective national restraint upon unfair money-getting has tended to create a small class of enormously wealthy and economically powerful men, whose chief object is to hold and increase their power . . . But we grudge no man a fortune which represents his own power and sagacity, when exercised with entire regard to the welfare of his fellows . . .”

那么,上个月在总统大选中投票时,作为一个有同样关切、一辈子都是共和党人的人,该怎么办呢?我决定投票给巴拉克·奥巴马,部分原因是我认同他以及他两位共和党前辈亚伯拉罕·林肯和西奥多·罗斯福所秉持的那些价值观。这些价值观不是哪一个政党的专利——它们本质上属于整个社会。更进一步,在我看来,这些价值观恰好实现了费城社区学院那句校训——“通往可能性之路”——的应有之义。奥巴马那场鼓舞人心的当选,我相信,将有助于引导美国从近年的道路上转身——那条路上,我们传统的价值观正逐渐被侵蚀,不仅体现在金融领域现已由全体国民买单的极度贪婪,也体现在我们这个浪费、短视、“我优先”的社会风气里。

So what was a lifelong Republican who shares these same concerns to do when he voted in our presidential election last month? I decided to cast my vote for Barack Obama, in part because I share those values with him, and with his Republican predecessors Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. Neither party has claim on them, for these values are societal in nature. Further, it seems to me that these values take the theme of the Community College of Philadelphia—The Path to Possibilities—to its logical fruition. Barack Obama’s inspiring election, will I think, help lead America away from her recent path in which our traditional values have been gradually eroded—and not only in the gross excesses of our financial sector which are now being borne by our citizenry—but also in our wasteful, short-term-oriented “me first” society.

一个关于品格的问题

我一向是个乐观者,我相信我们当选的总统将不负我的信念——他有足够的气质和品格来带领我们度过当下的艰难与挑战,让我们回归这个国家奠基时的价值观。请容我再用一次罗斯福的话,他讲得太对了,不仅对我们的候任总统如此,对我们每一个人都是如此,尤其对 CCP 的学生、教师和管理者而言更是这样。他是这么说的:“归根结底,任何人职业生涯中最重要的要素,必定是那些我们在总体上称之为品格的特质的总和。我们必须拥有正确的品格——那种品格首先让一个人在家里是个好人,在邻里间是个好邻居,是一个[美国给予其]最大发展可能的普通公民。”

A Question of Character Ever the optimist, I believe that our president-elect will measure up to my conviction that he has the temperament and character to lead us through today’s struggles and challenges and return us to our nation’s founding values. If you’ll bear with me, hear Roosevelt just once more, for he got it right, not only for our president-to-be, but for each one of us, and especially for the students and teachers and managers of CCP. Here’s what he said: “In the last analysis, the most important elements in any man’s career must be the sum of those qualities which, in the aggregate, we speak of as character. We must have the right kind of character—character that makes a man, first of all, a good man in the home, and a good neighbor, a private citizen [whom America offers] the best possible chance for development.”

所以,我们永远不要忘记,从长远来看,构成任何国家核心的,不是物质,不是权力,也不是金钱。而是品格和价值观,正是那些我们作为个体在社会中已经践行的价值观:坚韧、决心、韧性、道德标准,以及那些让这个国家变得伟大的美德。今天在座的每一个人,无论老少、学生还是老师、商界人士还是专业人士,都能够——也必须——为这场伟大的复兴贡献力量。

So let’s never forget that over the long term it is not things, nor power, nor money that form the heart of any nation. Rather, it is character and values, the very values, applied to our society that I have described here for us as individuals: the persistence, the determination, the resilience, the moral standards, and the virtue that have made this nation great. Everyone here in this room today, young and old, student and teacher, businessperson and professional alike can— and must—help in this great revival.

※ 当然,今天我们会把女性也包括在内,我相信西奥多·罗斯福也会赞同这一点。

 Of course, today we’d include woman, and I’m sure Theodore Roosevelt would approve.