品格共同体

2009 · 演讲 · 原文约 1824 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

品格共同体——约翰·C·博格尔演讲

先锋集团创始人兼前首席执行官

荣获费城社区学院 2008 年博内尔奖,表彰其“体现创新、远见与决心理想”

在第二届年度“路径”早餐会上

2008 年 12 月 16 日

感谢迈克尔·纳特市长,感谢您光彩照人、慷慨无限的介绍,感谢您对费城社区学院的支持,也感谢您拨冗出席,我想今天又是您作为大都市市长在严峻经济环境下履行艰巨职责的繁忙一天。

A Community of Character Remarks by John C. Bogle Founder and former Chief Executive, The Vanguard Group On receiving the 2008 Bonnell Award From the Community College of Philadelphia for “Embodying the Ideals of Innovation, Vision, and Determination” At the 2nd Annual Pathways Breakfast December 16, 2008 Thank you, Mayor Michael Nutter for that glowing and infinitely generous introduction, for your support of the Community College of Philadelphia, and for honoring us with your presence in what I’m sure is yet another busy day as you fulfill your awesome responsibilities as a big-city mayor in a tough economic environment.

我深感荣幸能接受社区学院颁发的博内尔奖,尽管我担心你们在创新者和远见卓识者这一点上对我评价过高了。(至于决心,你们也许说对了!)在座的大部分人都知道,艾伦·T·博内尔博士是这所学院的创始院长,从 1965 年学院创立之初开始领导,直到 1983 年从该职位退休。博内尔博士今天上午也来到了现场,我邀请大家和我一起,感谢他在这所伟大院校的开创性领导。同样感谢斯蒂芬·柯蒂斯博士,延续了这份领导。

I’m deeply honored to accept the Bonnell Award from our Community College even as I fear you over-rate me in terms of my credentials as an innovator and a visionary. (Perhaps you’re right about the determination!) As most of you in this audience know, Dr. Allan T. Bonnell was the founding president of the college, and served as its leader from its inception in 1965 until retiring from that post in 1983. Dr. Bonnell is with us this morning, and I ask you to join me in recognizing his pioneering leadership of this great institution. Thank you, too, Dr. Stephen Curtis for continuing that leadership.

在努力了解 CCP 工作(此处指查理斯·巴德·菲利普斯(Charles “Bud” Phillips,即 CCP))的过程中,我翻到了贵校《Pathways》杂志 2008 年夏季刊。从中我才得知,我是第二位荣获博内尔奖的人。在座各位或许记得,第一位获奖者是比尔·科斯比,你们一年前刚表彰过他。如今,我们俩以这种方式相聚,共同礼赞美国今天所代表的——比以往任何时候都更具力量——多元性,我无比自豪地站立在他巨大的身影之下。

In my effort to understand the work of CCP, I came upon the Summer 2008 issue of your Pathways magazine. There, I learned that I am but the second person to receive the Bonnell award. The first, as some of you may recall, was Bill Cosby, whom you honored a year ago. As we now pair up in a tribute to the diversity that America represents today—more effectively than ever before—I’m enormously proud to stand in his giant shadow.

在同一期《Pathways》杂志中,我也读到一篇关于传奇人物小威廉·T·科尔曼律师的文章。他是民权先驱,第一位进入《哈佛法律评论》编委会的黑人,第一位为美国最高法院大法官担任书记官的黑人,也是第一位进入美国总统内阁的黑人。这些年来我与比尔·科尔曼有过一些交往,但始终怀有极大的敬意。他与我一样坚信教育的重要性,并高度认可社区大学的巨大价值——用他的话来说,“让人们有机会学习新知识、从事不同的事情……如果美国要继续保持其在世界上的领导地位,这是一项必要的发展。”当然,威廉·科尔曼说得完全正确。

In that same Pathways issue, I also read the article about the legendary William T. Coleman, Jr., Esq., the civil rights pioneer who was the first black to serve on the board of the Harvard Law Review, to clerk for a Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, and to serve in the cabinet of a President of the United States. I’ve known Bill Coleman just a bit over the years, but with great admiration. He shares my belief in the importance of education and the great value of community colleges that, in his words, “allow people to get new learning and do different things . . . a necessary development if the United States is going to continue its position of (world) leadership.” And of course, William Coleman is right.

科尔曼是如何克服他早年生活中社会上盛行的种族偏见所造成的明显障碍的呢?他告诉我们:“生活中总有障碍。那是你面临的挑战之一。关键就在于能否抓住机会。”事实正是如此,这也是 CCP 为超过 50 万男女学员所做的事情——他们来到 CCP 学习、求知,以便更好地克服自己生活中遇到的各种障碍。上周,我会见了其中四位学员——卡尔、海蒂、埃尔文和莎伦——交谈之后,他们的背景差异之大,以及他们在人生充满挑战的道路上克服障碍、抓住机遇的坚定决心,都令我深感敬佩。

How did Coleman overcome the obvious obstacles created by the racial intolerance that was so prevalent in our society during his early life? He tells us; “There are always obstacles in life. That’s one of the challenges you have. It’s just a matter of being able to take advantage of opportunities.” And so it is, and that’s what CCP is trying to do for the 500,000-plus men and women who have come through its doors to study and to learn, to better overcome the obstacles they have faced in their lives. Last week I visited with four of those students—Carl, Heidi, Ervan and Sharon—and came away from the conversation impressed with the diversity of their backgrounds and the single-mindedness of their determination to overcome those obstacles, and to take advantage of the opportunities that are presented along the challenging pathway of life.

“人人生而平等”——我和这四位杰出学生的会面,让我想起了成年后大部分时间里深藏心底的忧虑:我们这个国家未能充分提供机会平等。这个问题,在我新书《足够:金钱、商业与人生的真正度量》中刚刚有过阐述。以下是我人生哲学的核心:所有被命运眷顾、因教育而充实、被决心驱动的人,都可以为自己的好运感到自豪。但即使我们在美国文明的巨大恩惠中蓬勃发展,也必须提醒自己,如今共享这些恩惠的公民比例实在太小——而正如《独立宣言》所保证的“人人生而平等”,不平等——在家庭中、在教育中,甚至可以说在机会上——从我们出生的那一刻就已开始。

“All Men Are Created Equal” My visit with these four exceptional students reminded me of the deep concerns that I’ve held for most of my adult life about our nation’s failure to adequately provide equality of opportunity, most recently articulated in my new book, Enough. True Measures of Money, Business, and Life. Here is the essence of my philosophy: All of us who have been favored by fate, enriched by education, and driven by determination can feel proud of our good fortune. But even as we thrive on the great benefits of our American civilization, we must remind ourselves that today these benefits are shared by far too small a portion of our citizenry, while, as our Declaration of Independence assures us, “all men are created equal,” inequality—in family, in education, and, yes, even in opportunity—begins at the very moment of our birth.

但美利坚合众国的宪法要求更高的追求。“我们合众国人民”被要求“组成一个更完善的联邦,建立正义,确保国内安宁……促进公共福利,并保障我们自己和子孙后代的自由福泽”。这些不只是口号;它们代表了我们这个时代的挑战:为每一位希望改善自身命运的公民——无论年龄、种族或血统——打开机会之门。教育和职业培训正是解锁并打开这些大门的钥匙。

But the Constitution of the United States of America demands something better. “We the People” are enjoined “to form a more perfect Union, to establish Justice for all; to insure domestic Tranquility . . . to promote the general Welfare, and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” These are not mere words; they represent the challenge of our age: to open the doors of opportunity to any citizen of any age, of any race, and of any heritage who wishes to improve his or her lot in life. Education and career training are the keys to unlocking, and then opening, those doors.

亚伯拉罕·林肯与西奥多·罗斯福 这些理想绝非我一人独有。事实上,一个半世纪前,它们由我们最伟大的总统之一精彩阐述,一个世纪前又由另一位总统重新表述。先听听亚伯拉罕·林肯的话:“我认为,只要人类存在,他就有责任不仅改善自身处境,还要协助改善全人类……劳动优先于资本,且独立于资本。既然资本只是劳动的果实,那么劳动就高于资本,理应得到更高的重视。”然而,林肯补充道:“让无家可归者不要拆毁他人的房屋,而要勤奋工作,为自己建造一座房屋,这样以身作则,确保他自己的房屋安全无虞。”

Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt These ideals are hardly mine alone. In fact, a century and a half ago, they were beautifully expressed by one of our greatest presidents, and restated a century ago by another. First hear Abraham Lincoln: “ I hold that while man exists it is his duty to improve not only his own condition, but to assist in ameliorating mankind . . . Labor is prior to, and independent of capital. Since capital is only the fruit of labor, labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.” Yet, Lincoln added, “Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another, but let him work diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe.”

将近 100 年前,西奥多·罗斯福在 1910 年那场关于“新国家主义”的著名演讲中引用了林肯的话,指出“如果林肯的这番话是我原创的,那我恐怕会比现在更被强烈地抨击为共产主义煽动者”。罗斯福这样表述道:“那些拥有超出其应得之人与那些应得却未拥有之人之间的斗争,其本质在于均等机会、消除特权,并让每个人的生命与公民身份对自身和共同体都具有尽可能高的价值。”

Almost 100 years ago, Theodore Roosevelt quoted Lincoln’s words in his remarkable 1910 speech on “The New Nationalism,” noting that “if Lincoln’s remarks were original with me, I should be even more strongly denounced as a Communist agitator than I shall be anyhow.” Roosevelt put it this way, “The essence of the struggle between the men who possess more than they have earned and the men who have earned more than they possess is to equalize opportunity, destroy privilege, and give to the life and citizenship of every individual the highest possible value both to himself and to the commonwealth.

“全体公民实现实际上的机会平等,当我们达成这一目标时,”他继续说道,“将带来两大成果。第一,每个人都将获得公平的机会,充分发挥自身潜能;凭借自己的能力——既不受自身特殊特权的助力,也不受他人特殊特权的阻碍——达到力所能及的最高峰,并为自己和家人挣得与他们劳动大致相称的回报。第二,机会平等意味着国家将从每位公民那里获得他所能提供的最高水平的服务。”在我看来,这番话恰恰概括了费城社区学院的核心理念。

“Practical equality of opportunity for all citizens, when we achieve it,” he continued, “will have two great results. First, every man will have a fair chance to make of himself all that in him lies; to reach the highest point to which his capacities, unassisted by special privilege of his own and unhampered by the special privilege of others, can carry him, and to get for himself and his family substantially what he has earned. Second, equality of opportunity means that the commonwealth will get from every citizen the highest service of which he is capable.” It seems to me that these words sum up precisely what the Community College of Philadelphia is all about.

“但是,”罗斯福接着说,“除非每一美元都是公平赚来的,否则任何人都不该得到它。每一美元收入都应该代表一美元价值的服务——不是股票投机,而是实际的服务。(原文着重强调。)因此,我主张对巨额财富征收累进所得税,并对巨额遗产征收累进遗产税……随着财产规模增加而迅速递增。”鉴于西奥多·罗斯福对累进税制的承诺,我感到既好笑又失望的是,当当选总统巴拉克·奥巴马支持的政策——没错,正是根植于林肯和罗斯福的共和党传统时,他却被人恶意描述为“社会主义者”,其目标是“分财富”,这与罗斯福当年预料会被骂作共产主义者的情景如出一辙。

“But,” Roosevelt continued, “No man should receive a dollar unless that dollar has been fairly earned. Every dollar received should represent a dollar’s worth of service rendered—not gambling in stocks, but service rendered. (Italics added.) Therefore, I believe in a graduated income tax on big fortunes, and a graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes . . . increasing rapidly in amount with the size of the estate.” Given Theodore Roosevelt’s commitment to progressive taxation, I find myself both amused and disappointed that when President-elect Barack Obama endorsed policies rooted in, yes, the Republican party of Lincoln and Roosevelt, he was described darkly as a “socialist” whose goal was to “spread the wealth,” echoing Roosevelt’s expectation of being called a Communist all those years ago.

当前的金融危机,当然主要是由股票投机引发的——更不用说当代的债券投机和所谓的衍生品投机了。这种用别人的钱进行的赌博,为华尔街极少数人创造了巨额财富,本质上,在股市泡沫期间,我们国家的“宇宙主宰者”们只为自己狭隘的利益服务。但正如我们现在所知,当泡沫破裂时(它总是会破裂),华尔街给那些作为我们国家脊梁的普通老百姓带来了难以想象的伤害。许多年前,罗斯福就清楚地预见到了这一结果:“对于不公正的牟利行为缺乏有效的国家约束,导致形成了一个人数不多但极其富有且经济实力强大的阶层,其主要目标就是维持和扩大他们的权力……但是,如果一个人凭借自己的力量和智慧,在完全顾及同胞福祉的前提下获得财富,我们并不嫉妒他……”

The Present Financial Crisis The present financial crisis, of course was precipitated importantly by gambling in stocks—to say nothing of the modern-day gambling in bonds and so-called derivatives. This gambling with other people’s money created enormous wealth for the few of Wall Street as, in essence, our nation’s “masters of the universe” served their own parochial interests during the market bubble. But, as we now know, when the bubble burst (as it always does) Wall Street inflicted an incredible disservice to the real people of Main Street, the backbone of our nation. All those years ago, Roosevelt clearly anticipated this outcome: “The absence of effective national restraint upon unfair money-getting has tended to create a small class of enormously wealthy and economically powerful men, whose chief object is to hold and increase their power . . . But we grudge no man a fortune which represents his own power and sagacity, when exercised with entire regard to the welfare of his fellows . . .”

那么,上个月在总统大选中投票时,一位同样怀有这些忧虑的终身共和党人该怎么做呢?我决定把票投给巴拉克·奥巴马,部分原因是我与他,以及与他同属共和党的前任亚伯拉罕·林肯和西奥多·罗斯福,都认同这些价值观。没有哪个政党能独占它们,因为这些价值观本质上是社会性的。此外,在我看来,这些价值观将费城社区学院的主题——“通往可能之路”——推向了逻辑上的圆满实现。巴拉克·奥巴马的鼓舞人心的当选,我认为将有助于引导美国摆脱最近那条让我们的传统价值观逐渐被侵蚀的道路——这不仅体现在我们金融部门那些现已由公民承受的严重过度行为上,也体现在我们那种浪费的、短视的“我优先”的社会中。

So what was a lifelong Republican who shares these same concerns to do when he voted in our presidential election last month? I decided to cast my vote for Barack Obama, in part because I share those values with him, and with his Republican predecessors Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. Neither party has claim on them, for these values are societal in nature. Further, it seems to me that these values take the theme of the Community College of Philadelphia—The Path to Possibilities—to its logical fruition. Barack Obama’s inspiring election, will I think, help lead America away from her recent path in which our traditional values have been gradually eroded—and not only in the gross excesses of our financial sector which are now being borne by our citizenry—but also in our wasteful, short-term-oriented “me first” society.

人品问题

我一向乐观,相信我们当选的总统会如我所料——他具备足够的性情与品格,能够带领我们度过当下的困境与挑战,重返我们国家的立国价值。请耐心听我再说一次罗斯福的话,因为他说得对,这不仅适用于我们即将上任的总统,也适用于我们每一个人,尤其适用于中央财经大学(CCP)的师生与管理者。他是这样说的:“归根结底,任何人生涯中最要紧的要素,是那些我们统称为‘人品’的素质的总和。我们必须拥有正确的人品——那种首先使人成为家中好丈夫、邻家好邻居、私德公民的人品,而美国为这种人提供了最好的发展机会。”

A Question of Character Ever the optimist, I believe that our president-elect will measure up to my conviction that he has the temperament and character to lead us through today’s struggles and challenges and return us to our nation’s founding values. If you’ll bear with me, hear Roosevelt just once more, for he got it right, not only for our president-to-be, but for each one of us, and especially for the students and teachers and managers of CCP. Here’s what he said: “In the last analysis, the most important elements in any man’s career must be the sum of those qualities which, in the aggregate, we speak of as character. We must have the right kind of character—character that makes a man,* first of all, a good man in the home, and a good neighbor, a private citizen [whom America offers] the best possible chance for development.”

那么,我们永远不要忘记,从长远来看,构成任何国家核心的,不是物质,不是权力,也不是金钱。而是品格与价值观——正是这些我在此描述的、适用于我们社会的价值观,作为个体应当具备的:坚韧、决心、韧性、道德标准,以及造就这个国家伟大的美德。今天在座的所有人,无论老少、师生、商界人士还是专业人士,都可以——也必须——为这场伟大的复兴贡献力量。

So let’s never forget that over the long term it is not things, nor power, nor money that form the heart of any nation. Rather, it is character and values, the very values, applied to our society that I have described here for us as individuals: the persistence, the determination, the resilience, the moral standards, and the virtue that have made this nation great. Everyone here in this room today, young and old, student and teacher, businessperson and professional alike can— and must—help in this great revival.

  • 当然,今天我们会把女性也包括在内,我相信西奥多·罗斯福会同意这一点。
  • Of course, today we’d include woman, and I’m sure Theodore Roosevelt would approve.