帮助他人
帮助他人
约翰·C·博格尔,先锋集团创始人,获奖感言
在领取救世军“他人”奖之际
宾夕法尼亚州费城
2011 年 5 月 11 日
我深感荣幸能获得救世军颁发的“他人”奖,也很高兴有机会简单谈谈我的几点思考——关于我们每个人、在座的每一位,都应当在繁忙的人生中留出相当一部分时间,本着这个奖项的精神去“回馈”——去帮助他人,帮助那个我们养育家庭、追求事业、度过一生的社区。
HELPING OTHERS Remarks by John C. Bogle, Founder, The Vanguard Group On Receiving the “Others” Award from the Salvation Army Philadelphia, PA May 11, 2011 I am deeply honored to receive the “Others” Award of the Salvation Army, and pleased to have the opportunity to offer some brief reflections about the need, for each one of us here today, to reserve a fair portion of our busy lives for “giving back”—in the spirit of the award—for helping others in the community in which we raise our families, pursue our careers, and live our lives.
为了让我的发言更有一些深层背景,我在每张桌上都准备了本人 2009 年所著《够了:金钱、生意与生活的真正衡量标准》的赠阅本。这本书现已第二次印刷,我有幸收到威廉·杰斐逊·克林顿总统所作的序言、畅销书作家兼商业大师汤姆·彼得斯所做的序曲,以及耶鲁捐赠基金经理大卫·斯文森的推荐语。颇具讽刺意味的是,大卫在书中找到的正是我今天想强调的信息:“对每个人提出挑战,激励我们成为家庭、职业和社群中更好的成员。”
In the hope of giving some deeper context to my remarks, I’ve taken the liberty of providing complimentary copies of my 2009 book—ENOUGH. True Measures of Money, Business, and Life— at each table. Now in its second printing, I was honored to receive a Foreword from President William Jefferson Clinton, a Prologue from best-selling author and business guru Tom Peters, and an endorsement from Yale Endowment Fund Manager David Swensen. Ironically, David found in the book the very message that I’d like to amplify today: “a challenge for each of us to aspire to become better members of our families, our professions, and our communities.”
知足的故事。
The Story of Enough.
如果我仅仅列出这本书十个短章节的标题,你就能轻易理解《知足》一书的核心思想。汤姆·彼得斯将其称为“十诫”:______________ 注:本演讲所表达的观点不一定代表先锋基金现任管理层的看法。关于投资——· 成本太多,价值不足· 投机太多,投资不足· 复杂性太多,简单性不足关于商业——· 算计太多,信任不足· 商业行为太多,职业操守不足· 销售技巧太多,受托责任不足· 管理太多,领导力不足关于生活——· 对物质关注太多,对承诺投入不足· 21 世纪的价值观太多,18 世纪的价值观不足· “成功”太多,品格不足我写这本书的使命,是促使读者思考这些问题,并开始推动我们的社会走向一个节点——在那里,我们目前拥有过多的那些特质会少一些,而那些(在我看来)我们远远不够的特质会多一些。
If I simply give you the titles of its ten short chapters, you’ll easily understand what Enough. is all about. Tom Peters described them as “the Ten Commandments:” ______________ Note: The opinions expressed in this speech do not necessarily represent the views of Vanguard’s present management On Investing-- · Too Much Cost, Not Enough Value · Too Much Speculation, Not Enough Investment · Too Much Complexity, Not Enough Simplicity On Business-- · Too Much Counting, Not Enough Trust · Too Much Business Conduct, Not Enough Professional Conduct Too Much Salesmanship, Not Enough Stewardship · Too Much Management, Not Enough Leadership On Life-- · Too Much Focus on Things, Not Enough Focus on Commitment · Too Many Twenty-First-Century Values, Not Enough Eighteenth-Century Values · Too Much “Success,” Not Enough Character My mission in writing the book was to provoke readers to think about these issues, and begin to move our society to a point where it has less of those attributes that we now have too much of, and more of those attributes of which (it seems to me) we have not nearly enough.
鉴于我们今天赞美救世军在社区服务中的卓越表现——最近最令人瞩目的,便是在奈斯镇建造了美轮美奂的克罗克社区中心——我认为第 10 章“成功太多,品格不足”尤其应景。这一章开篇是乔治亚州一位杰出的传教士弗雷德·克拉多克牧师讲述的一个美妙故事。他或许在发挥想象——传教士们常爱这么干——但他坚称此事真实发生。克拉多克博士去侄女家做客,看到一只老灵缇犬——就是赛场上追逐电动兔子那种快犬。侄女收养了它,免得它在退役后被安乐死。克拉多克博士跟这只灵缇攀谈起来:“我问它:‘你还参赛吗?’”
Given our celebration today of the marvelous community service performed by The Salvation Army—most recently in the completion of the fabulous Kroc Community Center up in Nicetown—I thought that Chapter 10—“Too Much Success, Not Enough Character”—would be especially relevant. It begins with a wonderful story told by The Reverend Fred Craddock, a remarkable preacher from Georgia. He may have been imagining things—the way preachers are wont to do—but he says this story really happened. Dr. Craddock was visiting in the home of his niece. There was this old greyhound, one of those speedy dogs who race around a track chasing mechanical rabbits. His niece had taken the dog in to prevent it from being destroyed because its racing days were over. Dr. Craddock struck up a conversation with the greyhound: I said to the dog, “Are you still racing?”
“不。”他答道。
“No” he replied.
“嘿,出什么事了?你是年纪太大跑不动了吗?”
“Well, what was the matter? Did you get too old to race?”
“不,我身上还有点儿竞赛的劲头。”
“No, I still had some race in me.”
“那后来呢?你没赢吗?”
“Well, what then? Did you not win?”
“我为主人赚了超过一百万美元。”
“I won over a million dollars for my owner.”
“呃,那是什么样的?糟糕的待遇?”
“Well, what was it? Bad treatment?”
“哦,不,”那条狗说道。“我们赛跑的时候,他们对我们可好了。”
“Oh, no,” the dog said. “They treated us royally when we were racing.”
“你被打残了吗?”
“Did you get crippled?”
“不行。”“那为什么?”我追问。“为什么?”
“No” “Then why?” I pressed. “Why?”
那只狗回答说:“我不干了。”
The dog answered, “I quit.”
“You quit?”
“You quit?”
“是的,”他说,“我不干了。”
“Yes,” he said. “I quit.”
“你为什么要辞职?”
“Why did you quit?”
“我辞职了,因为跑了那么久、那么久、那么久之后,我才发现,我追的那只兔子根本就不是真的。”
“I just quit because after all that running and running and running, I found out that the rabbit I was chasing wasn’t even real.”
美国的遗产
这是个真实的故事吗?嗯,也许不是。但我猜想,我们这些在商业、贸易和金融领域谋生的人,大多数都明白那条老灰狗的感受。我们有多少次绕着跑道一圈圈疾驰,忙于自己的事务,追逐着个人成功的虚幻兔子——以财富、名声和权力来衡量?然后有一天,如果我们够幸运,会发现自己真正的兔子——一种活得很好的生活,为自己在生命中找到有意义的位置,其中包含为我们的社区提供实实在在的服务,尤其是那些亟需帮助的社区,那里生活着几乎毫无机会去享受《独立宣言》所承诺的“生命、自由和追求幸福的天赋权利”的人们。
America’s Heritage A true story? Well, perhaps not. But I expect that most of us who ply our trades in business, commerce, and finance know just how that old greyhound felt. How often have we sped around and around the track, doing our busy jobs and chasing the false rabbit of personal success, measured by wealth, fame and power? Then one day, if we’re lucky, we discover the real rabbit—a life well-lived, finding for ourselves a meaningful place in life, one which includes substantial service to our communities, especially those that desperately need help, populated by human beings with barely a fighting chance to enjoy “the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” that our Declaration of Independence promises.
是的,我们的《独立宣言》向我们保证“人人生而平等”。但很多时候,这种平等在出生那一刻就结束了。在我们社会中,有太大部分的人群面临着大量的不平等,包括财富、家庭凝聚力、教育,以及最终的整体机会上的极端差距。然而,我们这些受到如此眷顾的人,必须携起手来,做更多事去帮助那些远没有那么幸运的人,将“自由的祝福传遍这片土地”。正如我们的开国先贤所要求的那样,我们必须竭尽全力“促进普遍福祉……为我们自己和我们的后代”。
Yes, our Declaration assures us that “all men are created equal.” But far too often that equality ends at the moment birth takes place. For too large a segment of our society, we find lots of inequality, including extreme disparities in wealth, in family cohesion, in education, and ultimately in opportunity as a whole. Yet together, we who have been so favored have much to do to help those far less favored, to spread “the blessings of liberty throughout the land.” As our Founding Fathers demanded, we must do our best to “promote the general welfare . . . for ourselves and our posterity.”
尽管近期经历了金融崩盘,经济仍步履蹒跚,失业率高得惊人(且几乎毫无改善迹象),但美国的物质财富——我们的生产力、科技与创新——依然令世界艳羡。但我们切莫忘记,从长远来看,构成任何国家核心的并非财富、物质、权力或金钱。而是我们的品格——我们的价值观、决心、毅力、韧性、道德标准与美德——成就了这个国家的伟大。这种品格才是这个国家最坚实的现实,也是我们希望的源泉。
Despite the recent financial crash and our still-stumbling economy, with unemployment at shocking levels (and showing few signs of improvement), America’s material wealth—our productivity, our technology, and our innovation—remain the envy of the world. But let’s never forget that over the long term it is not wealth, nor things, nor power, nor money that form the heart of any nation. Rather, it is our character—our values, our determination, our persistence, our resilience, our moral standards, and our virtue that has made this nation great. That character is the great reality of this nation, and what gives us hope.
品格与价值观 从这种一般意义上谈论品格与价值观的重要性很容易。那么现在让我聚焦一个具体案例,在这些品格与价值观中清晰可见。你可能猜到了,我指的是救世军——这家卓越的慈善机构,同时也是一个同样卓越的投资标的。我们最伟大的商业哲学家兼作家之一、已故的彼得·德鲁克清楚地认识到,这个组织不仅关乎慈善与善行,更关乎那些帮助它满足国家一些最迫切需求的投资。他曾对救世军前全国总指挥罗伯特·沃森说:“我认为你们是风险投资家。”无论如何,正是救世军的品格与价值观,构成了它一系列令人瞩目成就的基石,包括我们今天所庆祝的这些成就。
Character and Values It’s easy to talk about the importance of character and values in this general sense. So now let me focus on a particular case where they are so easily visible. I refer, as you might suspect, to The Salvation Army, this remarkable charity, yes, but an equally remarkable investment. One of our greatest business philosophers and writers, the late Peter Drucker, clearly recognized that this organization is not only about charity and good works, but about investments that help it fulfill some of the nation’s greatest needs. He told former Salvation Army National Commander Robert Watson that “I consider you to be venture capitalists.” Whatever the case, it is also the Salvation Army’s character and values that are the foundation of its impressive range of achievements, including those we celebrate today.
在他那本精彩的著作《美国最有效的组织》(这可是德鲁克博士的原话)中,沃森总裁指出,“人们有一种内在的需求,渴望与比自身更宏大的目标建立联结。”他甚至引用了两本畅销商业书作者的话:先听听《基业长青》的作者吉姆·柯林斯怎么说:“最优秀的管理者渴望创造比自身更伟大、更持久的东西——一个建立在永恒核心价值观之上的常青机构,其存在的目的超越了单纯赚钱。”再听听汤姆·彼得斯(我在今天的发言开场时提到过他)——他与鲍勃·沃特曼合著了《追求卓越》——的话:“我们怀疑,一家公司如果价值观不清,或者没有正确的价值观,是否可能成为卓越的公司。”
In his wonderful book, The Most Effective Organization in the U.S. (that’s a quote from Dr. Drucker), Commander Watson noted that “people are driven by an intrinsic need to connect with a purpose larger than themselves,” and even quotes the authors of two best-selling business books: First hear Jim Collins, author of Built To Last: “The best executives aspire to create something bigger and more lasting than themselves—an on-going institution rooted in a set of timeless core values that exists for a purpose beyond just making money.” And now hear Tom Peters (whom we met at the start of my remarks today), author of “Search for Excellence” (with Bob Waterman): “We wonder whether it is possible to be an excellent company without clarity on values and without having the right sort of values.”
像今天在座的许多人一样,我怀着浓厚的兴趣阅读了沃森指挥官的书。机缘巧合的是,他的书章节编排思路与我在《足够》一书中所表达的价值观不谋而合——实际上,也与我在 1974 年创立先锋集团时所秉持的价值观如出一辙。他书中那些尤其触动我的章节标题包括:· 激发精神 · 将人置于目标之中 · 通过倾听来领导 · 分担责任、分享利润 · 大胆行动 · 让快乐变得重要
关于先锋集团的一言
我斗胆提及先锋集团,只是因为我受邀领取这座珍贵的“他人”奖时,主办方将救世军的事业与我个人创建一家独特、属于股东的共同企业这一谦卑追求相提并论——这家企业旨在通过“与股东分享利润”来给予投资者公平的待遇。我们也致力于为普通投资者服务,这虽比不上救世军创始人威廉·布斯——那位以“血与火”闻名的人——为受苦受难的人类服务那般崇高,但性质相似。同样,我们的事业与你们的事业都曾面临巨大的阻力。
Like many of you here today, I’ve read Commander Watson’s book with compelling interest. By providential coincidence, his book is organized around chapters reflecting the same sorts of values that I expressed in Enough., indeed the same sorts of values that I invested in Vanguard when I founded the firm back in 1974. Among those chapter titles that particularly struck me in his book were these: · Engage the Spirit · Put People in your Purpose · Lead by Listening · Spread the Responsibility, Share the Profits · Act with Audacity · Make Joy Count A Word About Vanguard I have the temerity to mention Vanguard only because my invitation to receive this treasured “OTHERS” award compared the Salvation Army’s quest with my own humble quest to build a unique mutual (shareholder-owned) enterprise that would give investors a fair shake by “sharing the profits” with our stockholders. We also aimed to serve the average investor, a lesser version of the quest of Salvation Army founder William Booth—he of “Blood and Fire” fame—to serve hurting humanity. Similarly, both our quest and yours came in the face of considerable opposition.
当然,不可能创建一家与救世军模式完全一致的商业企业。但先锋集团的原则几乎如出一辙,并且一直是解释我们为何能为成千上百万“真实、朴实、有血有肉、怀揣各自希望、恐惧和财务梦想的人”取得如此成就的关键因素——这些人将约 1.6 万亿美元的积蓄托付给我们,以求实现财务独立。
Of course it’s not possible to create a commercial enterprise that precisely matches The Salvation Army model. But Vanguard’s principles are virtually identical, and have been a vital factor in explaining what we have been able to achieve for those millions and millions of “honest-to-God, down-to-earth, human beings, with their own hopes, fears, and financial aspirations,” who have entrusted us with some $1.6 trillion of their savings in their quest to achieve financial independence..
是的,我们将“人置于使命之中”,承诺为投资者提供其应得的那一份——无论金融市场最终慷慨赐予我们怎样的长期投资回报(当然,也不得不承受市场在途中恶意施加的短期下跌,这同样是他们应得的那一份)。这一承诺依赖于最大程度的分散化,以及将投资成本降到最低——这正是驱动我们事业的核心特征。
Yes, we “Put People in our Purpose,” with a promise to provide investors with their fair share of whatever long-term investment returns the financial markets are kind enough to reward us with (and, alas, their fair share of whatever short-term dips the markets are mean enough to inflict upon us along the way). That promise depends on the broadest possible diversification and on minimizing the costs of investing, the principal characteristics that drive our enterprise.
我也非常认同沃森司令的目标:“行事要果敢。”(我们总部园区里甚至有一栋楼叫“果敢号”,那是 1798 年纳尔逊勋爵在尼罗河战役中,以 HMS 先锋号为旗舰取得辉煌胜利时所指挥的一艘战列舰。)当然,创建这个新的互助结构、消除我们行业中泛滥的许多利益冲突、发起世界上第一只指数共同基金,以及开创一种几乎立刻就被同行效仿的创新债券策略——这些举动无疑都是果敢的。
I also resonated to Commander Watson’s goal, “Act with Audacity.” (We even have a building on our campus named “Audacious,” one of Lord Nelson’s ships-of-the-line in his brilliant victory aboard HMS Vanguard at the historic Battle of the Nile in 1798.) Of course it was audacious to create this new mutual structure, to eliminate so many of the conflicts of interest that plague our industry, to start the world’s first index mutual fund, and to create an innovative bond strategy that was almost immediately copied by our peers.
我们还努力“激发共情之魂”——无论是我们服务的投资客户,还是与我们共事的伙伴。没有互信的精神,我们今日的面貌就会黯然失色。同样,我们竭力“让快乐举足轻重”——工作圆满完成带来的快乐,先人后己的奉献之乐。所以,没错,基于原则、以价值观为基石的组织——哪怕在社区慈善与投资托管这样截然不同的领域——只要环境得当、领导有方,就能凝聚共识,服务于我们的利益相关方、社会乃至国家。
We’ve also tried to “Engage the Spirit” of those investor/clients whom we serve and those associates/crewmembers with whom we serve. Without a spirit of mutual trust, we would be a pale shadow of who we are today. And we, too, do our best to “Make Joy Count”, the joy of a job well done, the joy of service to others before service to ourselves. So, yes, principles-based, value-based organizations—even in fields as far apart as community philanthropy and investment trusteeship— can, under the right circumstances and the right leadership, make common cause in serving our constituencies, society, and our nation.
今日美国 最后,让我就我们国家——当然也包括其慈善机构和金融服务商——当前面临的挑战,谈几点简短的想法。全球范围内的事件——战争、恐怖主义、起义——只会加剧美国未来的不确定性。不稳定的经济、大量失业人口、环境威胁、贫富差距日益扩大,这些问题在很长一段时间内都无法得到解决。而且,如果我们不迅速采取行动,我们迅速膨胀的联邦债务已经将我们带上了一条通往难以想象的危机的道路。
America Today Let me close with a few brief thoughts about the challenges that our nation—certainly including its philanthropies and its financial service providers—are facing today. Events around the globe—wars, terrorism, uprisings—simply add to the uncertainty about America’s future. The shaky economy, the masses of unemployed, the threats to our environment, the growing gap between rich and poor will not be resolved for a long time. And, unless we take action promptly, our burgeoning federal debt has taken us on the road that will lead to an unimaginable crisis.
我们的政治体系陷入了僵局,而金钱在这个体系中的强大作用会让开国先贤们感到震惊。勇气和智慧是我们比以往任何时候都更需要的,但在谈论大多数政治领袖时,这两点却几乎不会首先浮现于脑海。然而,希望总是存在的——勇气和智慧终将获胜。正如丘吉尔提醒我们的那样:“美国人总是会在尝试过所有其他办法之后,才去做正确的事。”
Our political system is stalemated, and the powerful role of money in the system would have appalled our Founding Fathers. Courage and wisdom are what we need more than ever, but those are hardly the first two words that come to mind when talking about most of our political leaders. But there is always hope that courage and wisdom will ultimately prevail. As Churchill reminded us, “Americans always do what’s right…but only after they’ve tried everything else.”
是的,从许多方面来说,“这是考验人们灵魂的时刻。”因此,正如托马斯·潘恩所要求的那样,我们都必须坚守对国家服务的职责。如果我们失败了,正如潘恩所说,“我们只能责怪我们自己。”所以,让我们确保自己在追逐生命中真正的兔子,在一个复杂、风险重重且充满不确定性的世界里尽最大努力——为国家,为同胞服务。一旦我们做到这一点,就让我们继续跑下去——跑啊,跑啊,跑啊!——跑完这场美好人生的漫长赛跑。我们的社会对某种以物质财富、名声和权力为标准的成功观念已经给予了太多赞美。但我们远远不够重视一种更崇高的成功观念,它由一种更精神层面的财富、名声和权力来定义,简而言之,用一个词来概括:品格。
Yes, in many respects, “these are the times that try men’s souls.” So, as Tom Paine demanded, we all must stand by service to our country. If we fail, as Paine said, “we have no one to blame but ourselves.” So let’s make sure that we are chasing the real rabbit of life, doing our best—in a complicated, risky, and uncertain world—to serve our nation and our fellow man. Once we do that, let’s all keep running—and running, and running, and running!—the long race of a life well lived. We have quite enough lionizing of the notion of success as popularly defined by a certain kind of material wealth, fame, and power. But we do not have nearly enough of a more elevated notion of success, defined by a more spiritual kind of wealth, fame, and power, simply summed up in one word: character.
我们永远不嫌品格太多。我们的社会需要每一个人都投身于这项使命——将品格置于国家议程的首位,并确保每一位公民都能获得美国承诺提供的所有机会。我们能做到,但前提是我们要把这项崇高的事业当作自己的责任。
We can never have enough character. Our society needs every one of us to be part of the mission that will place character at the top of our national agenda—and assure that every one of our citizens has all of the opportunities America has pledged to provide. We can do it, but only if we make that noble task our own.