《卫报》:G20都市神话与横加干涉
在伦敦聚会的各国领导人要想有效应对这场金融危机,就必须明白两个令人不快的事实。
There are a couple of unpalatable facts which it is vital for the leaders assembling in London this week to understand if they are to tackle this financial crisis effectively.
第一个事实就是危机的根源(没有哪个医生会在没弄清病因的情况下就贸然给病人治疗)。这很容易。危机是银行家的贪婪和奖金制度的罪恶造成的。这导致银行向次级抵押贷款借款人过度放贷,并交易 CDO、CLO 和 CDS 等五花八门的衍生品和结构化信贷工具。因此,政府要做的只是对银行进行资本重组、令其恢复放贷、公开批评一些银行家,问题就解决了。
The first is the cause of the crisis (no doctor would attempt to treat a patient without first trying to diagnose the cause of the illness). That's easy. The crisis was caused by bankers' greed, and the evils of the bonus system. This led to banks lending too much to subprime borrowers and trading in an alphabet soup of derivative and structured credit instruments such as CDOs, CLOs and CDS. So all governments have to do is recapitalise the banks, get them lending again, pillory some bankers, and the problem's solved.
遗憾的是,这种街谈巷议根本没有触及问题的根源。信贷泡沫——其破裂具有如此巨大的灾难性——主要源于一系列政策反应,但并非完全如此,主要是美联储(Fed)的政策。从 1987 年的股灾到 2000–03 年的互联网泡沫破灭,只要市场陷入困境,美国政府就匆忙援救,削减利率和税收,以刺激需求和让投资看上去很廉价。
Sadly, this urban myth gets nowhere near the root cause of the problem. The credit bubble, the puncturing of which has been so cataclysmic, arose from a series of policy responses primarily, but not exclusively, from the US Federal Reserve. Every time the market has been in difficulty, from the crash of 1987 to the dotcom bust of 2000-03, the US authorities rushed to the rescue, cutting interest rates and taxes to stimulate demand and make investments look cheap.
由于不让市场经历低迷不可避免的后果,官方的行动导致信贷猛增和资产价格膨胀,而这种膨胀的破裂,比它们所阻止的任何低迷都更加痛苦。正如我们从中看到的,干预自然规律是危险的行为。然而,当前实施的正是这种政策反应。通过支持陷入困境的银行和汽车制造商,当局只会延长不可避免的痛苦。
By not allowing the market to experience the inevitable consequences of a downturn, the actions of the authorities led to soaring credit creation and asset price inflation, the collapse of which is now much more painful than any of the downturns they prevented would have been. As we can see from this, interfering with nature is a dangerous thing. Yet that is the policy response which is now being maintained. By propping up bust banks and auto manufacturers, the authorities will merely prolong the inevitable agony.
而且,他们没有考虑是什么导致他们采取了那些不当政策。西方经济的主要问题有一个重要原因:亚洲(尤其是中国)成为低成本制造商,导致了通缩冲击。这种对商品成本的通缩性影响,与西方保持就业和生活水平的政治需要发生了冲突,因而西方国家通过低利率和宽松信贷,以使消费能够持续。
What is more, they haven't thought about what caused them to adopt those inappropriate policies. The major problems in the western economies had one big cause: the deflationary shock caused by Asia and, in particular, China's emergence as a low-cost manufacturer. This deflationary influence on the cost of goods collided with a political imperative to maintain western jobs and living standards through lower rates of interest and lax credit in order to enable consumption to continue.
即便 20 国集团(G20)领导人能够修复金融体系中的问题(这似乎不太可能),需求也不会重返原有水平。如果盈余国家(尤其是中国)没有强劲的国内需求,产能将会过剩。这与西方经济体姗姗来迟、同时对人口结构至关重要的储蓄/支出调整产生了冲突,将导致经济萧条。
Even if the G20 manage to fix the problems in the financial system, which seems unlikely, demand will not return to its former level. Without strong domestic demand in the surplus countries, and in particular China, there will be a capacity overhang. This is colliding with the long overdue and demographically vital savings/expenditure adjustment in western economies which will lead to a depression.
第二个令人不快的事实与政府的信誉有关,在某种程度上反映在它们的货币上。许多国家的政府不得不为银行的债务提供担保,以使银行体系能够生存下去,而货币政策已超越传统模式,通过零利率,一步步走向所谓的定量宽松。
Unpalatable fact number two is about the creditworthiness of governments, which is partly expressed through their currencies. Many governments have had to guarantee their banks' obligations in order for their banking system to survive, and monetary policy has moved on from the conventional up through the gears via zero interest rates to so-called quantitative easing.
定量宽松——央行购买证券——的影响可以从它的通俗描述中衡量:“印钞票”。这 inevitably 冒着货币贬值和通胀的风险。这使我想起 20 国集团领导人应考虑的另一个重要事实:美国是何时放弃金本位的?金本位可以确保每发行 1 美元纸币,就持有一定数量的黄金。一旦放弃金本位,世界就开始实验法定储备货币,在这种货币体系下,让所有人都相信 1 美元可以购买特定数量商品的唯一理由,就是因为美联储说了算。
The effect of quantitative easing - the purchasing of securities by the central bank - can be gauged in its popular description: "printing money". It inevitably risks a debasement of the currency and inflation. Which brings us to another important fact G20 leaders should bear in mind: when did America leave the gold standard? The gold standard was what ensured that there was a fixed amount of gold held for every paper dollar in issue. Once it was abandoned, the world began its experiment with a fiat reserve currency, in which the only thing that made anyone believe $1 would buy a particular amount of goods was because the Fed said it would.
那么,美国放弃金本位有多久了?大多数人似乎认为,这是应对大萧条(Great Depression)的措施,或是二战后经济复苏的部分举措。事实上,美国是在 1971 年根据理查德•尼克松(Richard Nixon)的行政命令放弃金本位的。这不仅看上去是近期的事情,也表明始于上世纪 80 年代初的牛市,是在放弃金本位之后出现的。或许,过去 25 年的情况远不是“正常”(每个人似乎都想重返这种状态),而是一种由此引发的异常现象。
So how long has the US been off the gold standard? Most people seem to assume that this occurred as a response to the Great Depression, or as part of the recovery from the second world war. In fact the gold standard was abandoned in 1971, by executive order of Richard Nixon. Not only does this seem shockingly recent, it also suggests that the bull market conditions that began in the early 1980s followed this abandonment. Maybe the conditions of the past quarter-century were far from "normal" (to which everyone seems to want to return) but an aberration caused by this.
与此同时,正如中国和俄罗斯领导人似乎清楚意识到的那样,美国已经开始了一项实验,它可能导致世界储备货币贬值。
Meanwhile - as the leaders of China and Russia seem well aware - the US has embarked upon an experiment which is likely to lead to the debasement of the world's reserve currency.
Terry Smith
Terry Smith
The Guardian
The Guardian