《每日邮报》|是时候停止谈论增长,金融界大佬特里·史密斯称财政大臣应效仿爱沙尼亚

2012 · 文章 · 原文约 667 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

如果让我说一件我希望乔治·奥斯本(George Osborne)在秋季预算声明中说、但他绝不会说的话,那就是:“别再谈增长了。”

Asked to name just one thing that I think George Osborne should say in the Autumn Statement but he won’t, it is: ‘Stop talking about growth’.

我们不断听到关于经济增长乏力的说法,这次的秋季预算声明也不会例外。

We keep hearing about the lack of economic growth and this Autumn Statement will be no exception.

人们会对低于预期的增长数据扼腕叹息,而埃德·鲍尔斯(Ed Balls)无疑会用他那可笑的“B 计划”来攻击这份声明——那等于是借债花钱、试图摆脱债务危机的一场注定失败的尝试。

There will be hand wringing about lower growth than forecast, and Ed Balls will no doubt attack the Statement with his risible ‘Plan B’, which would equate to a doomed attempt to borrow and spend our way out of a debt crisis.

声明中可能会有一些促进增长的姿态,比如设立新的商业银行、增加基础设施支出,以及/或者更多关于刺激住房市场的荒唐误解。

There may be gestures towards promoting growth in the form of a new business bank, increased infrastructure spend, and/or yet more misconceived nonsense about stimulating the housing market.

我最近与爱沙尼亚财政部长于尔根·利吉(Jürgen Ligi)共进午餐,我认为乔治·奥斯本应该从他那里得到启发,知道该说些什么。

I had lunch recently with the Estonian Minister of Finance, Jürgen Ligi, and I think George Osborne should take his cue on what to say from him.

利吉先生来伦敦是为了在爱沙尼亚的经济表现受到经济学家保罗·克鲁格曼(Paul Krugman)批评后,为爱沙尼亚进行辩护。

Mr Ligi was in London to put Estonia’s case after its economic record was criticised by the economist Paul Krugman.

爱沙尼亚在 2000 年至 2007 年间经历了异常的增长,但随着金融危机在 2008 年爆发,它面临房价下跌和失业率上升。

Estonia experienced exceptional growth in 2000-07, but as the financial crisis took hold in 2008 it faced falling house prices and rising unemployment.

爱沙尼亚积累了经常账户赤字,2007 年达到 GDP 的 18% 峰值,私人部门债务超过 GDP 的 100%。听着耳熟吗?2008 年 GDP 下降 4.2%,2009 年更是大幅下降 14.1%。

Estonia ran up a current account deficit which peaked at 18 per cent of GDP in 2007 and private sector debt which exceeded 100 per cent of GDP. Sounds familiar? GDP fell by 4.2 per cent in 2008 and by no less than 14.1 per cent in 2009.

面对这种情况,爱沙尼亚政府开始了紧缩计划。这是一个真正的紧缩计划,而不是财政大臣迄今给我们的那种虚假计划——支出继续上升,只是比最初预测的增速稍慢而已。

Faced with this the Estonian government embarked on an austerity programme. A real one, not the sort of sham programme which the Chancellor has given us so far in which spending continues to rise but at a lower rate than originally forecast.

在爱沙尼亚,2008 年至 2010 年间公共支出被削减了 10%。国家支付的养老金份额被冻结,对医疗保险费用的支付削减了 8%。税收也提高了,尤其是增值税从 18% 上调至 20%。

In Estonia public spending was cut by 10 per cent between 2008 and 2010. The state’s share of payments to pensions was frozen and its payments to health insurance costs were cut by 8 per cent. Taxes were also increased. In particular VAT was raised from 18 per cent to 20 per cent.

由于这些措施,爱沙尼亚的赤字从未超过 GDP 的 3%。经济也开始再次增长(鲍尔斯先生请注意)——2010 年增长 3.3%,2011 年增长 8.3%。

As a result of these measures, Estonia’s deficit never exceeded 3 per cent of GDP. And the economy began to grow again (Mr Balls please take note) – by 3.3 per cent in 2010 and 8.3 per cent in 2011.

那么,克鲁格曼教授对爱沙尼亚看似堪称典范的表现的批评是什么呢?那就是尽管经济复苏了,2011 年的 GDP 仍比 2007 年的峰值低约 8%。

So what was Professor Krugman’s criticism of Estonia’s apparently exemplary record? It is that despite this recovery, GDP in 2011 was still some 8 per cent below its peak in 2007.

所以当我见到于尔根·利吉时,我向他问起这一点。他回答说,繁荣顶峰的 GDP 水平是一种幻觉,试图回到那个水平就像追逐海市蜃楼。

So when I met Jürgen Ligi, I asked him about this. He responded by saying that the GDP level at the peak of the boom was an illusion, and trying to get back to it was like the pursuit of a mirage.

那时的 GDP 被过度的债务所抬高,因为爱沙尼亚人为了互相出售越来越贵的房子而借越来越多的钱。听着耳熟吗?

The GDP at that point was inflated by excessive debt, as Estonians were borrowing more and more in order to sell each other more and more expensive houses. Sound familiar?

乔治·奥斯本应该认识到,英国面临的情况与爱沙尼亚当时类似,而世界其他地方的情况也没有好转。

George Osborne should recognise that the UK is in a similar situation to that which faced Estonia, and around the world things are not getting any better.

欧元区经济是一场火车失事,至少把人们的注意力从英国转移开了。

The Eurozone economy is a train wreck which has at least diverted attention from the UK.

日本仍是世界第三大经济体,但刚刚进入 1989 年以来的第五次衰退。它的困境证明了应用凯恩斯主义经济理论的糟糕结果,因为日本政府债务是收入的 20 倍。

Japan, still the world’s third largest economy, has just entered its fifth recession since 1989. Its plight is a testament to the poor outcome of applying Keynesian economic theories, as its government debt is 20 times revenues.

日本还饱受 1989 年房地产市场崩盘后长期假装过度杠杆的借款人并未破产、以及借钱给他们的银行也未破产的做法之苦。听着耳熟吗?

It also suffers from the prolonged attempt after its property market crashed in 1989 to pretend that the over-leveraged borrowers were not bust and neither were the banks which lent to them. Sound familiar?

美国经济更为强劲,但值得记住的是,紧缩方案在美国甚至尚未达成一致,更不用说实施了——但它终将必须实施。

The US economy is stronger but it is worth remembering that austerity has yet to be even agreed much less implemented there – but it will have to be.

所以我希望乔治·奥斯本说:“以显著增长为目标是不现实的,而改变策略、增加支出只会证明收益递减规律。”

So I hope George Osborne says: ‘It is unrealistic to target significant growth, and a change of strategy to spend more would simply demonstrate the Law of Diminishing Returns’.

然后他应该把时间花在解决英国庞大的预算赤字和经常账户赤字上。但我怀疑他不会这么做。

He should then spend his time dealing with the correction of the UK’s yawning budget and current account deficits. But I doubt he will.

Terry Smith

Terry Smith